Ouergui Ibrahim, Houcine Nizar, Marzouki Hamza, Davis Philip, Franchini Emerson, Gmada Nabil, Bouhlel Ezzedine
1Research Unit "Sportive Performance and Physical Rehabilitation," Higher Institute of Sports and Physical Education, University of Jendouba, Kef, Tunisia;2Faculty of Sciences Bizerte, University of Carthage, Bizerte, Tunisia;3Combat Sports Performance, Braintree, Essex;4Martial Arts and Combat Sports Research Group, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil;5Sultan Qaboos Sports Academy, Ministry of Sports Affairs, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman; and6Laboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1840-1846. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001665.
Ouergui, I, Houcine, N, Marzouki, H, Davis, P, Franchini, E, Gmada, N, and Bouhlel, E. Physiological responses and time-motion analysis of small combat games in kickboxing: impact of ring size and number of within-round sparring partners. J Strength Cond Res 31(7): 1840-1846, 2017-The study aimed to investigate the physiological responses and time-structure of small combat games (SCGs) in kickboxing according to ring sizes and number of sparring partners. Twenty athletes from regional (n = 13) and national levels (n = 7) participated in the study (mean ± SD, age: 20.3 ± 0.9 years; height: 177 ± 4.8 cm; body mass: 71.8 ± 10.5 kg). Blood lactate concentration [La] was measured before and after bouts, and the delta (Δ) was determined. Heart rate (HR) was measured throughout and HR and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were also measured postbout. The HRpre, HRmean, and percentage of peak HR (%HRpeak) were used for analysis. The HRpeak was determined during a cycle ergometer graded exercise test. Each athlete was confronted by 1 (1 vs. 1; no sparring partner change), 2 (1 vs. 2) and 4 opponents (1 vs. 4) within-round (sparring partner change every 1 minute or 30 seconds, respectively) in different ring sizes (i.e., 2×2 m, 4×4 m, and 6×6 m). All combats were recorded and analyzed to determine the duration of different activity phases (high-intensity activities [HIA], low-intensity actions [LIA], and referee pause [P]). Results showed that values for HRpre and HRmean when opposed by a single individual (1 vs. 1) were lower than other conditions (all p < 0.001). Moreover, %HRpeak values in 1 vs. 1 were lower than in other conditions and higher in 4 × 4 m compared with other sizes. [La]pre, post, and the Δ did not differ among all conditions (p > 0.05). The RPE scores were lower in 1 vs. 1 compared with other conditions (p < 0.001), with no ring sizes effect (p > 0.05). For time-motion variables, HIA values were lower in 1 vs. 1 than in the 2 other conditions and was longer in 2 × 2 m compared with 4 × 4 m and 6 × 6 m, whereas LIA values were higher in 1 vs. 1 and lower in the 2 × 2 m. In conclusion, SCGs seem to be a good form of exercise for sufficient cardiovascular conditioning specific to kickboxing activity in comparison with data from previous studies.
乌尔吉、I、侯赛因、N、马祖基、H、戴维斯、P、弗兰基尼、E、加达、N和布赫莱、E。踢拳中小型格斗游戏的生理反应和时间动作分析：拳台大小和回合内陪练伙伴数量的影响。《力量与体能研究杂志》31(7): 1840 - 1846，2017年 - 本研究旨在根据拳台大小和陪练伙伴数量，调查踢拳中小型格斗游戏（SCG）的生理反应和时间结构。来自地区（n = 13）和国家水平（n = 7）的20名运动员参与了该研究（平均值±标准差，年龄：20.3±0.9岁；身高：177±4.8厘米；体重：71.8±10.5千克）。在回合前后测量血乳酸浓度[La]，并确定差值（Δ）。全程测量心率（HR），回合后还测量心率和主观用力程度分级（RPE）。使用HRpre、HRmean和心率峰值百分比（%HRpeak）进行分析。心率峰值在自行车功率计递增运动测试期间确定。每位运动员在不同拳台大小（即2×2米、4×4米和6×6米）下，在回合内分别面对1名对手（1对1；无陪练伙伴更换）、2名对手（1对2）和4名对手（1对4）（分别每1分钟或30秒更换陪练伙伴）。记录并分析所有格斗情况，以确定不同活动阶段（高强度活动[HIA]、低强度动作[LIA]和裁判暂停[P]）的持续时间。结果表明，与单个对手对抗（1对1）时的HRpre和HRmean值低于其他情况（所有p < 0.001）。此外，1对1时的%HRpeak值低于其他情况，且4×4米拳台的%HRpeak值高于其他尺寸。所有情况下的[La]pre、post和Δ无差异（p > 0.05）。1对1时的RPE得分低于其他情况（p < 0.001），无拳台大小影响（p > 0.05）。对于时间动作变量，1对1时的HIA值低于其他两种情况，且2×2米拳台的HIA值比4×4米和6×6米拳台更长，而1对1时的LIA值更高，2×2米拳台的LIA值更低。总之，与先前研究数据相比，SCG似乎是一种针对踢拳活动进行充分心血管调节的良好运动形式。
