• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为社区卫生工作者提供的糖尿病控制教育课程的效果:一项随机临床试验。

Efficacy of an education course delivered to community health workers in diabetes control: A randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

de Souza Camila Furtado, Dalzochio Mériane Boeira, Zucatti Alessandra Teixeira Netto, De Nale Rosana, de Almeida Marília Tavares, Gross Jorge Luiz, Leitão Cristiane Bauermann

机构信息

Primary Care Divison, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Division of Endocrinology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Endocrine. 2017 Aug;57(2):280-286. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1352-z. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1007/s12020-017-1352-z
PMID:28646377
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community health workers are community members who provide education and care for patients for a broad range of health issues, including diabetes mellitus. However, few community health workers are trained for diabetes education and little is known about the effectiveness of their interventions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a diabetes education program delivered to community health workers in improving the metabolic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Eight community health workers, providing care for 118 patients, were randomized in two groups to receive a 1-month diabetes education program (intervention, patients n = 62) or an education course in other health issues (control, patients n = 56). Each community health worker was responsible for transmitting the acquired knowledge to patients. Primary outcome was changed in HbA1C 3 months after the intervention.

RESULTS

PARTICIPANTS: Mean age was 61 ± 11 years, 35% were men and 62% were whites. HbA1c levels reduced in both groups (intervention: 9.1 ± 2.2 vs. 7.9 ± 1.9%; control: 9.1 ± 2.1 vs. 8.4 ± 2.5%, p < 0.001), but no statistically significant differences were observed between groups (p between groups = 0.13). Total cholesterol (intervention: 192 ± 43 vs. 182 ± 39 mg/dl; control: 197 ± 44 vs. 191 ± 45 mg/dl, p between groups = 0.035) and triglycerides (intervention: 158 [106-218] vs. 135 [106-215]; control: 128 [100-215] mg/dl vs. 146 [102-203] mg/dl, p between groups = 0.03) reduced overtime only in intervention group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a significant decrease in HbA1c was observed during patients' follow-up, but it was similar in intervention and control groups. The diabetes mellitus education course delivered to community health workers was able to improve patients' lipid profile.

摘要

背景

社区卫生工作者是为包括糖尿病在内的广泛健康问题的患者提供教育和护理的社区成员。然而,很少有社区卫生工作者接受过糖尿病教育培训,且对其干预效果知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估向社区卫生工作者提供的糖尿病教育计划对改善2型糖尿病患者代谢控制的效果。

方法

八名社区卫生工作者为118名患者提供护理,随机分为两组,一组接受为期1个月的糖尿病教育计划(干预组,患者n = 62),另一组接受其他健康问题的教育课程(对照组,患者n = 56)。每位社区卫生工作者负责将所学知识传授给患者。主要结局是干预后3个月糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)的变化。

结果

参与者:平均年龄为61±11岁,35%为男性,62%为白人。两组的HbA1c水平均降低(干预组:9.1±2.2 vs. 7.9±1.9%;对照组:9.1±2.1 vs. 8.4±2.5%,p < 0.001),但两组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异(组间p = 0.13)。总胆固醇(干预组:192±43 vs. 182±39mg/dl;对照组:197±44 vs. 191±45mg/dl,组间p = 0.035)和甘油三酯(干预组:158[106 - 218] vs. 135[106 - 215];对照组:128[100 - 215]mg/dl vs. 146[102 - 203]mg/dl,组间p = 0.03)仅在干预组随时间降低。

结论

在本研究中,患者随访期间观察到HbA1c显著下降,但干预组和对照组相似。向社区卫生工作者提供的糖尿病教育课程能够改善患者的血脂状况。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of an education course delivered to community health workers in diabetes control: A randomized clinical trial.为社区卫生工作者提供的糖尿病控制教育课程的效果:一项随机临床试验。
Endocrine. 2017 Aug;57(2):280-286. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1352-z. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
2
Community Diabetes Education (CoDE) for uninsured Mexican Americans: a randomized controlled trial of a culturally tailored diabetes education and management program led by a community health worker.社区糖尿病教育(CoDE)在未参保墨西哥裔美国人中的应用:一项由社区卫生工作者主导的、具有文化适应性的糖尿病教育和管理项目的随机对照试验。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;100(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
3
[La educación multimedia como apoyo en el manejo de pacientes con diabetes tipo 2. Estudio cuasi experimental].[多媒体教育对2型糖尿病患者管理的辅助作用。准实验研究]
Cir Cir. 2018;86(5):404-411. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.18000119.
4
Health effectiveness of community health workers as a diabetes self-management intervention.社区卫生工作者作为糖尿病自我管理干预措施的健康效益。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2017 Jul;14(4):316-326. doi: 10.1177/1479164117696229. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
5
Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol Among Patients With Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial.印度一项针对伴发抑郁和糖尿病患者的随机临床试验(INDEPENDENT)表明,协同护理模式可改善抑郁症状及糖化血红蛋白、血压和血清胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):651-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11747.
6
Outcomes at 18 Months From a Community Health Worker and Peer Leader Diabetes Self-Management Program for Latino Adults.社区健康工作者和同伴领导的糖尿病自我管理计划对拉丁裔成年人的 18 个月结果。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jul;41(7):1414-1422. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0978. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
7
Effectiveness of a Female Community Health Volunteer-Delivered Intervention in Reducing Blood Glucose Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: An Open-Label, Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.女性社区卫生志愿者实施干预对降低 2 型糖尿病成人血糖的效果:一项开放标签、整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2035799. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35799.
8
Metabolic control and chronic complications during a 3-year follow-up period in a cohort of type 2 diabetic patients attended in primary care in the Community of Madrid (Spain).在西班牙马德里自治区接受初级保健的2型糖尿病患者队列中,3年随访期内的代谢控制与慢性并发症情况。
Endocrinol Nutr. 2014 Jan;61(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
9
A Community Health Worker-Delivered Intervention in African American Women with Type 2 Diabetes: A 12-Month Randomized Trial.一项由社区卫生工作者为非裔美国2型糖尿病女性提供的干预措施:一项为期12个月的随机试验。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Aug;25(8):1329-1335. doi: 10.1002/oby.21883. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
10
Diabetes Self-Management Education and Medical Nutrition Therapy: A Multisite Study Documenting the Efficacy of Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Interventions in the Management of Glycemic Control and Diabetic Dyslipidemia through Retrospective Chart Review.糖尿病自我管理教育和医学营养治疗:通过回顾性图表审查记录注册营养师干预在血糖控制和糖尿病血脂异常管理中的疗效的多地点研究文件。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Mar;119(3):449-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.06.303. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Task-sharing for non-communicable disease prevention and control in low- and middle-income countries in the context of health worker shortages: A systematic review.在卫生工作者短缺背景下中低收入国家非传染性疾病预防与控制的任务分担:一项系统综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;5(4):e0004289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004289. eCollection 2025.
2
Task-sharing with community health workers to treat hypertension: a scoping review.社区卫生工作者分担任务治疗高血压:范围综述。
J Hypertens. 2024 Dec 1;42(12):2041-2054. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003834. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
3
Characteristics and Outcomes of Community Health Worker Training to Improve the Prevention and Control of Cardiometabolic Diseases in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetes self-management education reduces risk of all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病自我管理教育可降低2型糖尿病患者的全因死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2017 Mar;55(3):712-731. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1168-2. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
2
Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.远程医疗对糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白的影响:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2017 Mar 6;189(9):E341-E364. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150885. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
3
Structured therapeutic education in diabetes: is it time to re-write the chapter on the prevention of diabetic complications?
社区卫生工作者培训以改善中低收入国家心血管代谢疾病预防和控制的特征和结果:系统评价。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221112834. doi: 10.1177/00469580221112834.
4
Determining the frequency and level of task-sharing for hypertension management in LMICs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.确定低收入和中等收入国家高血压管理任务分担的频率和水平:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Apr 15;47:101388. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101388. eCollection 2022 May.
5
The Effects of Dietary Education Interventions on Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.膳食教育干预对 2 型糖尿病患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 10;18(16):8439. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168439.
6
Needs and resources of people with type 2 diabetes in peri-urban Cochabamba, Bolivia: a people-centred perspective.玻利维亚科恰班巴市周边 2 型糖尿病患者的需求和资源:以人为中心的视角。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Apr 20;20(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01442-1.
7
Self-management in face-to-face peer support for adults with type 2 diabetes living in low- or middle-income countries: a systematic review.面对面的同伴支持在 2 型糖尿病成人患者中的自我管理:一项系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1834. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09954-1.
8
Task-sharing interventions for improving control of diabetes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.任务分担干预措施在改善中低收入国家糖尿病控制中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e170-e180. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30449-6. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
9
Task sharing with non-physician health-care workers for management of blood pressure in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非医师卫生保健工作者分担工作以管理中低收入国家的血压:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Jun;7(6):e761-e771. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30077-4.
糖尿病的结构化治疗教育:是时候重写关于预防糖尿病并发症的章节了吗?
Endocrine. 2016 Aug;53(2):347-9. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-0947-0. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
4
Macrovascular and microvascular disease in obese patients with type 2 diabetes attending structured diabetes education program: a population-based propensity-matched cohort analysis of Patient Empowerment Programme (PEP).参加结构化糖尿病教育项目的 2 型糖尿病肥胖患者的大血管和微血管疾病:基于人群的患者赋权计划(PEP)倾向匹配队列分析
Endocrine. 2016 Aug;53(2):412-22. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0843-z. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
5
Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.2型糖尿病的糖尿病自我管理教育与支持:美国糖尿病协会、美国糖尿病教育者协会以及营养与饮食学会联合立场声明
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jul;38(7):1372-82. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0730. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
6
Patient Empowerment Programme in primary care reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based propensity-matched cohort study.初级保健中的患者赋权计划降低了 2 型糖尿病患者的全因死亡率和心血管疾病:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Feb;17(2):128-35. doi: 10.1111/dom.12397. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
7
Impact of a community health workers-led structured program on blood glucose control among latinos with type 2 diabetes: the DIALBEST trial.由社区卫生工作者主导的结构化项目对拉丁裔2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:DIALBEST试验
Diabetes Care. 2015 Feb;38(2):197-205. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0327. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
8
Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis.基于群组的糖尿病自我管理教育与常规治疗相比用于 2 型糖尿病患者。系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 23;12:213. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-213.
9
Lasting effects of a 2-year diabetes self-management support intervention: outcomes at 1-year follow-up.2 年糖尿病自我管理支持干预的持久效果:1 年随访时的结果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E109. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.110313. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
10
The effect of nurse-led diabetes self-management education on glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis.护士主导的糖尿病自我管理教育对糖化血红蛋白和心血管风险因素的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Diabetes Educ. 2012 Jan-Feb;38(1):108-23. doi: 10.1177/0145721711423978. Epub 2011 Nov 23.