Mitchell Jonathan A, Quante Mirja, Godbole Suneeta, James Peter, Hipp J Aaron, Marinac Catherine R, Mariani Sara, Cespedes Feliciano Elizabeth M, Glanz Karen, Laden Francine, Wang Rui, Weng Jia, Redline Susan, Kerr Jacqueline
a Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition , Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
b Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , PA , USA.
Chronobiol Int. 2017;34(8):1042-1056. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1337032. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
Rest-activity patterns provide an indication of circadian rhythmicity in the free-living setting. We aimed to describe the distributions of rest-activity patterns in a sample of adults and children across demographic variables. A sample of adults (N = 590) and children (N = 58) wore an actigraph on their nondominant wrist for 7 days and nights. We generated rest-activity patterns from cosinor analysis (MESOR, acrophase and magnitude) and nonparametric circadian rhythm analysis (IS: interdaily stability; IV: intradaily variability; L5: least active 5-hour period; M10: most active 10-hour period; and RA: relative amplitude). Demographic variables included age, sex, race, education, marital status, and income. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test for demographic differences in rest-activity patterns. Adolescents, compared to younger children, had (1) later M10 midpoints (β = 1.12 hours [95% CI: 0.43, 1.18] and lower M10 activity levels; (2) later L5 midpoints (β = 1.6 hours [95% CI: 0.9, 2.3]) and lower L5 activity levels; (3) less regular rest-activity patterns (lower IS and higher IV); and 4) lower magnitudes (β = -0.95 [95% CI: -1.28, -0.63]) and relative amplitudes (β = -0.1 [95% CI: -0.14, -0.06]). Mid-to-older adults, compared to younger adults (aged 18-29 years), had (1) earlier M10 midpoints (β = -1.0 hours [95% CI: -1.6, -0.4]; (2) earlier L5 midpoints (β = -0.7 hours [95% CI: -1.2, -0.2]); and (3) more regular rest-activity patterns (higher IS and lower IV). The magnitudes and relative amplitudes were similar across the adult age categories. Sex, race and education level rest-activity differences were also observed. Rest-activity patterns vary across the lifespan, and differ by race, sex and education. Understanding population variation in these patterns provides a foundation for further elucidating the health implications of rest-activity patterns across the lifespan.
静息 - 活动模式可反映自由生活环境中的昼夜节律。我们旨在描述不同人口统计学变量的成人和儿童样本中的静息 - 活动模式分布情况。一个包含590名成人和58名儿童的样本在其非优势手腕上佩戴了活动记录仪,为期7个昼夜。我们通过余弦分析(中值、峰相位和振幅)和非参数昼夜节律分析(IS:日间稳定性;IV:日内变异性;L5:最不活跃的5小时时段;M10:最活跃的10小时时段;以及RA:相对振幅)生成静息 - 活动模式。人口统计学变量包括年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、婚姻状况和收入。使用线性混合效应模型来检验静息 - 活动模式中的人口统计学差异。与年幼儿童相比,青少年具有:(1)M10中点更晚(β = 1.12小时[95%置信区间:0.43,1.18])且M10活动水平更低;(2)L5中点更晚(β = 1.6小时[95%置信区间:0.9,2.3])且L5活动水平更低;(3)静息 - 活动模式规律性较差(IS较低且IV较高);以及(4)振幅较低(β = -0.95[95%置信区间:-1.28,-0.63])和相对振幅较低(β = -0.1[95%置信区间:-0.14,-0.06])。与年轻成人(18 - 29岁)相比,中年及老年成人具有:(1)M10中点更早(β = -1.0小时[95%置信区间:-1.6,-0.4]);(2)L5中点更早(β = -0.7小时[95%置信区间:-1.2,-0.2]);以及(3)静息 - 活动模式更规律(IS较高且IV较低)。各成人年龄组的振幅和相对振幅相似。还观察到了性别、种族和教育水平在静息 - 活动方面的差异。静息 - 活动模式在整个生命周期中有所不同,并且因种族、性别和教育程度而异。了解这些模式中的人群差异为进一步阐明整个生命周期中静息 - 活动模式对健康的影响奠定了基础。