Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房中持续输注阿曲库铵与顺式阿曲库铵相比低血压的发生率。

The Incidence of hypotension with continuous infusion atracurium compared to cisatracurium in the Intensive Care Unit.

作者信息

VanderWeide Luke A, Abdel-Rasoul Mahmoud, Gerlach Anthony Thomas

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Center, Vancouver, WA, USA.

Center for Biostatistics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):113-118. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_35_16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A drug shortage of cisatracurium led to use of atracurium as an alternative neuromuscular blocker (NMB). Cisatracurium may be preferred due to less histamine release and potentially less hypotension. The study purpose is to compare the incidence of hypotension with continuous infusion atracurium to continuous infusion cisatracurium in ICU patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis reviewed 119 ICU patients who received either continuous infusion atracurium (56) or cisatracurium (63). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension (mean arterial pressure <60mmHg). Secondary outcomes included: incidence of blood pressure decrease of >20% from baseline, time to first hypotensive episode, treatment for hypotension during NMB use, hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and NMB duration.

RESULTS

Hypotension occurred in 64.3% of atracurium patients and 58.7% of cisatracurium patients ( = 0.58), with 60.7% experiencing >20% drop in blood pressure in atracurium group and 54.0% in cisatracurium ( = 0.58). Median time to first hypotensive episode was 9.4[Interquartile range 1.17-19.7] hours atracurium and 4.4[1.5-13.9] hours cisatracurium ( = 0.36). There were no differences between atracurium and cisatracurium groups respectively for median ICU LOS (10.5 days and 12.4 days, = 0.34), hospital LOS (14.0 days and 17.7 days, = 0.37), MV duration (9.3 days and 10.5 days, = 0.43), infusion duration (34.5 hours and 25 hours = 0.27), or hospital mortality (62.5% and 53.9%, = 0.336). Hypotension treatment was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of hypotension was similar between atracurium and cisatracurium. Critical drug shortages may provide an opportunity to study alternative drug therapy.

摘要

背景

顺式阿曲库铵药物短缺导致使用阿曲库铵作为替代神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMB)。由于组胺释放较少且可能导致的低血压情况较少,顺式阿曲库铵可能更受青睐。本研究目的是比较在重症监护病房(ICU)患者中持续输注阿曲库铵与持续输注顺式阿曲库铵时低血压的发生率。

材料与方法

这项回顾性队列分析研究了119例接受持续输注阿曲库铵(56例)或顺式阿曲库铵(63例)的ICU患者。主要结局是低血压的发生率(平均动脉压<60mmHg)。次要结局包括:血压从基线下降>20%的发生率、首次低血压发作的时间、神经肌肉阻滞剂使用期间低血压的治疗情况、医院死亡率、ICU和医院住院时间(LOS)、机械通气(MV)持续时间以及神经肌肉阻滞剂使用持续时间。

结果

阿曲库铵组患者中64.3%发生低血压,顺式阿曲库铵组患者中58.7%发生低血压(P = 0.58),阿曲库铵组60.7%的患者血压下降>20%,顺式阿曲库铵组为54.0%(P = 0.58)。阿曲库铵组首次低血压发作的中位时间为9.4[四分位间距1.17 - 19.7]小时,顺式阿曲库铵组为4.4[1.5 - 13.9]小时(P = 0.36)。阿曲库铵组和顺式阿曲库铵组在ICU中位住院时间(分别为10.5天和12.4天,P = 0.34)、医院住院时间(分别为14.0天和17.7天,P = 0.37)、机械通气持续时间(分别为9.3天和10.5天,P = 0.43)、输注持续时间(分别为34.5小时和25小时,P = 0.27)或医院死亡率(分别为62.5%和53.9%,P = 0.336)方面均无差异。两组间低血压治疗情况相似。

结论

阿曲库铵和顺式阿曲库铵的低血压发生率相似。关键药物短缺可能为研究替代药物治疗提供机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/913f/5479073/a11943bf0245/IJCIIS-7-113-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验