• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

目标、非目标和场景上下文如何影响现实世界中的目标检测?

How do targets, nontargets, and scene context influence real-world object detection?

作者信息

Katti Harish, Peelen Marius V, Arun S P

机构信息

Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India.

Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Oct;79(7):2021-2036. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1359-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-017-1359-9
PMID:28660468
Abstract

Humans excel at finding objects in complex natural scenes, but the features that guide this behaviour have proved elusive. We used computational modeling to measure the contributions of target, nontarget, and coarse scene features towards object detection in humans. In separate experiments, participants detected cars or people in a large set of natural scenes. For each scene, we extracted target-associated features, annotated the presence of nontarget objects (e.g., parking meter, traffic light), and extracted coarse scene structure from the blurred image. These scene-specific values were then used to model human reaction times for each novel scene. As expected, target features were the strongest predictor of detection times in both tasks. Interestingly, target detection time was additionally facilitated by coarse scene features but not by nontarget objects. In contrast, nontarget objects predicted target-absent responses in both person and car tasks, with contributions from target features in the person task. In most cases, features that speeded up detection tended to slow down rejection. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that humans show systematic variations in object detection that can be understood using computational modeling.

摘要

人类擅长在复杂的自然场景中找到物体,但引导这种行为的特征却难以捉摸。我们使用计算模型来衡量目标、非目标和粗略场景特征对人类物体检测的贡献。在单独的实验中,参与者在大量自然场景中检测汽车或人物。对于每个场景,我们提取与目标相关的特征,标注非目标物体(如停车计时器、交通信号灯)的存在,并从模糊图像中提取粗略的场景结构。然后,这些特定于场景的值被用于模拟每个新场景中人类的反应时间。正如预期的那样,目标特征是两项任务中检测时间的最强预测指标。有趣的是,粗略的场景特征会额外促进目标检测时间,但非目标物体则不会。相比之下,非目标物体在人物和汽车任务中都预测了目标不存在的反应,在人物任务中还有目标特征的贡献。在大多数情况下,加速检测的特征往往会减慢排除反应。综上所述,这些发现表明,人类在物体检测中表现出系统的变化,可以通过计算模型来理解。

相似文献

1
How do targets, nontargets, and scene context influence real-world object detection?目标、非目标和场景上下文如何影响现实世界中的目标检测?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Oct;79(7):2021-2036. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1359-9.
2
Modeling categorization of scenes containing consistent versus inconsistent objects.对包含一致与不一致物体的场景进行分类建模。
J Vis. 2010 Mar 26;10(3):11.1-11. doi: 10.1167/10.3.11.
3
Coherent natural scene structure facilitates the extraction of task-relevant object information in visual cortex.连贯的自然场景结构有助于在视觉皮层中提取与任务相关的目标信息。
Neuroimage. 2021 Oct 15;240:118365. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118365. Epub 2021 Jul 4.
4
Does object view influence the scene consistency effect?物体视图会影响场景一致性效应吗?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Apr;77(3):856-66. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0817-x.
5
TMS to the lateral occipital cortex disrupts object processing but facilitates scene processing.经颅磁刺激外侧枕叶皮质会干扰物体加工,但有利于场景加工。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):4174-84. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00095. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
6
Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.重力重要吗?语义和句法不一致对场景感知过程中注意力分配的影响。
J Vis. 2009 Mar 27;9(3):24.1-15. doi: 10.1167/9.3.24.
7
ERP evidence for the influence of scene context on the recognition of ambiguous and unambiguous objects.事件相关电位(ERP)证据表明场景背景对模糊和明确物体识别的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jun;72:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.023. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
8
Hysteresis in the dynamic perception of scenes and objects.场景和物体动态感知中的滞后现象。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Oct;143(5):1875-92. doi: 10.1037/a0037365. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
9
Auditory scene context facilitates visual recognition of objects in consistent visual scenes.听觉场景上下文有助于在一致的视觉场景中对物体进行视觉识别。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1267-1275. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02699-0. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
10
Perceptual expertise improves category detection in natural scenes.感知专长可提高自然场景中的类别检测能力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):172-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0872-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Interaction between central and peripheral vision: Influence of distance and spatial frequencies.中心视觉与周边视觉的相互作用:距离和空间频率的影响。
J Vis. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.1.3.
2
Human peripheral blur is optimal for object recognition.人类周边模糊度对物体识别最理想。
Vision Res. 2022 Nov;200:108083. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108083. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
3
Using compositionality to understand parts in whole objects.利用组合性理解整体对象中的部分。
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Aug;56(4):4378-4392. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15746. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
Could simplified stimuli change how the brain performs visual search tasks? A deep neural network study.简化刺激能否改变大脑执行视觉搜索任务的方式?一项深度神经网络研究。
J Vis. 2022 Jun 1;22(7):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.7.3.
5
Qualitative similarities and differences in visual object representations between brains and deep networks.大脑和深度网络中视觉目标表示的定性相似性和差异性。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 25;12(1):1872. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22078-3.
6
Are you from North or South India? A hard face-classification task reveals systematic representational differences between humans and machines.你来自印度北部还是南部?一项艰巨的面部分类任务揭示了人类和机器之间系统的表征差异。
J Vis. 2019 Jul 1;19(7):1. doi: 10.1167/19.7.1.
7
Machine vision benefits from human contextual expectations.机器视觉受益于人类的上下文预期。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 14;9(1):2112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38427-0.
8
Do Primates and Deep Artificial Neural Networks Perform Object Categorization in a Similar Manner?灵长类动物和深度人工神经网络进行物体分类的方式相似吗?
J Neurosci. 2019 Feb 6;39(6):946-948. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2458-18.2018.