Population Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab (PowerLab), School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; Early Start Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Population Wellbeing and Environment Research Lab (PowerLab), School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; Early Start Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Health Place. 2017 Jul;46:267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Several recent studies have suggested that people in socioeconomically disadvantaged circumstances may benefit more from local green space ('equigenesis'). This study provides a test of this hypothesis in children aged 0-13 years old. Results from multilevel models suggest the odds of sub-optimal general health were 14% lower among children in areas containing >21.5% green space compared to those with <10%. Higher parent-reported quality green space was associated with 18% lower odds of sub-optimal child health. However, no effect modification of the association between child health and area disadvantage across strata of green space quantity or quality was observed.
最近的几项研究表明,社会经济处境不利的人可能会从当地绿色空间中(“生态效益”)受益更多。本研究在 0-13 岁的儿童中对此假设进行了检验。多层次模型的结果表明,与绿地面积<10%的地区相比,绿地面积>21.5%的地区的儿童身体状况不佳的几率低 14%。父母报告的更高质量的绿色空间与儿童健康状况不佳的几率降低 18%相关。然而,在绿色空间数量或质量的各个层次上,儿童健康与地区劣势之间的关联没有观察到效应修饰。