Department of Microbiology and National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Boston University School of Medicine, 620 Albany Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;411:293-322. doi: 10.1007/82_2017_13.
This chapter describes the various strategies filoviruses use to escape host immune responses with a focus on innate immune and cell death pathways. Since filovirus replication can be efficiently blocked by interferon (IFN), filoviruses have evolved mechanisms to counteract both type I IFN induction and IFN response signaling pathways. Intriguingly, marburg- and ebolaviruses use different strategies to inhibit IFN signaling. This chapter also summarizes what is known about the role of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) in filovirus infection. These fall into three categories: those that restrict filovirus replication, those whose activation is inhibited by filoviruses, and those that have no measurable effect on viral replication. In addition to innate immunity, mammalian cells have evolved strategies to counter viral infections, including the induction of cell death and stress response pathways, and we summarize our current knowledge of how filoviruses interact with these pathways. Finally, this chapter delves into the interaction of EBOV with myeloid dendritic cells and macrophages and the associated inflammatory response, which differs dramatically between these cell types when they are infected with EBOV. In summary, we highlight the multifaceted nature of the host-viral interactions during filoviral infections.
本章描述了丝状病毒逃避宿主免疫反应的各种策略,重点介绍了先天免疫和细胞死亡途径。由于丝状病毒的复制可以被干扰素 (IFN) 有效地阻断,因此丝状病毒已经进化出了对抗 I 型 IFN 诱导和 IFN 反应信号通路的机制。有趣的是,马尔堡病毒和埃博拉病毒使用不同的策略来抑制 IFN 信号。本章还总结了 IFN 刺激基因 (ISGs) 在丝状病毒感染中的作用。这些基因分为三类:限制丝状病毒复制的基因、被丝状病毒抑制激活的基因,以及对病毒复制没有可测量影响的基因。除了先天免疫,哺乳动物细胞还进化出了对抗病毒感染的策略,包括诱导细胞死亡和应激反应途径,我们总结了我们目前对丝状病毒与这些途径相互作用的了解。最后,本章深入探讨了 EBOV 与髓样树突状细胞和巨噬细胞的相互作用以及相关的炎症反应,当这两种细胞类型被 EBOV 感染时,它们的反应存在显著差异。总之,我们强调了丝状病毒感染期间宿主-病毒相互作用的多方面性质。