Suppr超能文献

临床全外显子组测序知情同意书之间的差异。

Variation among Consent Forms for Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing.

作者信息

Fowler Sara A, Saunders Carol J, Hoffman Mark A

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):104-114. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0127-2. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to explore variation among informed consent documents for clinical whole exome sequencing (WES) in order to identify the level of consistency with the recommendations from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (Bioethics Commission) regarding informed consent for clinical WES. Recommendations were organized into a framework of key points for analysis. Content analysis was conducted on a sample of informed consent documents for clinical WES downloaded from 18 laboratory websites. We observed considerable variability in the content of informed consent documents among the sample of 18 laboratories. The mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, a measure of readability, of the consent forms was 10.8, above the recommended 8th grade level. For each of the individual ACMG and Bioethics Commission recommendations, the frequency of inclusion ranged from 11% to 100%. For the overall list of 18 consent items, inclusion ranged from 11 to 17 items (Mean = 13.44, Mode = 14). This analysis will be useful to laboratories that wish to create informed consent documents that comply with these recommendations. The consistent use of standardized informed consent process could improve communication between clinicians and patients and increase understanding of genetic testing.

摘要

本研究的目的是探究临床全外显子组测序(WES)知情同意文件之间的差异,以确定其与美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会(ACMG)和总统生物伦理问题研究委员会(生物伦理委员会)关于临床WES知情同意的建议的一致程度。建议被整理成一个分析要点框架。对从18个实验室网站下载的临床WES知情同意文件样本进行了内容分析。我们观察到18个实验室样本的知情同意文件内容存在相当大的差异。同意书的平均弗莱什-金凯德年级水平(一种可读性指标)为10.8,高于建议的8年级水平。对于ACMG和生物伦理委员会的每项单独建议,纳入频率从11%到100%不等。对于18项同意项目的总体清单,纳入项目从11项到17项不等(平均值 = 13.44,众数 = 14)。该分析对于希望创建符合这些建议的知情同意文件的实验室将是有用的。标准化知情同意流程的一致使用可以改善临床医生与患者之间的沟通,并增加对基因检测的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7f2/5794809/7285aa57f977/10897_2017_127_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验