Cárcamo Alvaro, Arosteguí Jorge, Coloma Josefina, Harris Eva, Ledogar Robert J, Andersson Neil
CIET Nicaragua, Managua, Nicaragua.
Division of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4295-7.
Studies in different countries have identified irregular water supply as a risk factor for dengue virus transmission. In 2013, Camino Verde, a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Managua, Nicaragua, and Mexico's Guerrero State, demonstrated impact of evidence-based community mobilisation on recent dengue infection and entomological indexes of infestation by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. This secondary analysis of data from the trial impact survey asks: (1) what is the importance of regular water supply in neighbourhoods with and without the trial intervention and (2) can community interventions like Camino Verde reasonably exclude households with adequate water supply?
Entomological data collected in the dry season of 2013 in intervention and control communities allow contrasts between households with regular and irregular water supplies. Indicators of entomological risk included the House Index and pupa positive household index. Generalised linear mixed models with cluster as a random effect compared households with and without regular water, and households in intervention and control communities.
For the House Index, regular water supply was associated with a protection in both intervention households (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.6-0.9) and control households (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.5-0.8). For the pupa positive household index, we found a similar protection from regular water supply in intervention households (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.4-0.8) and control households (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.5-0.9). The Camino Verde intervention had a similar impact on House Index in households with regular water supply (OR 0.7, 95%CI 0.5-1.0) and irregular water supply (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.4-0.8); for the pupa positive household index, the effect of the intervention was very similar in households with regular (OR0.5, 95%CI 0.3-0.8) and irregular (OR 0.5, 95%CI 0.3-0.9) water supply.
While Aedes aegypti control efforts based on informed community mobilisation had a strong impact on households without a regular water supply, this intervention also impacted entomological indices in households with a regular water supply. These households should not be excluded from community mobilisation efforts to reduce the Aedes aegypti vector.
ISRCTN27581154 .
不同国家的研究已确定供水不稳定是登革热病毒传播的一个风险因素。2013年,在尼加拉瓜马那瓜和墨西哥格雷罗州开展的一项群组随机对照试验——卡米诺·佛得角试验,证明了循证社区动员对近期登革热感染以及埃及伊蚊昆虫学侵扰指数的影响。对该试验影响调查数据的二次分析提出了以下问题:(1)在有或没有试验干预的社区中,稳定供水的重要性如何?(2)像卡米诺·佛得角这样的社区干预措施能否合理排除供水充足的家庭?
2013年旱季在干预社区和对照社区收集的昆虫学数据,可对供水稳定和不稳定的家庭进行对比。昆虫学风险指标包括房屋指数和蛹阳性家庭指数。以群组为随机效应的广义线性混合模型,对有或没有稳定供水的家庭以及干预社区和对照社区的家庭进行了比较。
对于房屋指数,稳定供水在干预家庭(比值比0.7,95%置信区间0.6 - 0.9)和对照家庭(比值比0.6,95%置信区间0.5 - 0.8)中均与防护作用相关。对于蛹阳性家庭指数,我们在干预家庭(比值比0.6,95%置信区间0.4 - 0.8)和对照家庭(比值比0.7,95%置信区间0.5 - 0.9)中发现了类似的稳定供水防护作用。卡米诺·佛得角干预措施对供水稳定家庭(比值比0.7,95%置信区间0.5 - 1.0)和供水不稳定家庭(比值比0.6,95%置信区间0.4 - 0.8)的房屋指数有类似影响;对于蛹阳性家庭指数,干预措施在供水稳定家庭(比值比0.5,95%置信区间0.3 - 0.8)和供水不稳定家庭(比值比0.5,95%置信区间0.3 - 0.9)中的效果非常相似。
虽然基于明智社区动员的埃及伊蚊控制措施对没有稳定供水的家庭有很大影响,但该干预措施也对有稳定供水家庭的昆虫学指标产生了影响。在减少埃及伊蚊病媒的社区动员工作中,不应将这些家庭排除在外。
ISRCTN27581154 。