Ng Shu Wen, Poti Jennifer M, Popkin Barry M
Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Sep;104(3):750-9. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.127944. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
It is unclear whether racial/ethnic and income differences in foods and beverages obtained from stores contribute to disparities in caloric intake over time.
We sought to determine whether there are disparities in calories obtained from store-bought consumer packaged goods (CPGs), whether brands (name brands compared with private labels) matter, and if disparities have changed over time.
We used NHANES individual dietary intake data among households with children along with the Nielsen Homescan data on CPG purchases among households with children. With NHANES, we compared survey-weighted energy intakes for 2003-2006 and 2009-2012 from store and nonstore sources by race/ethnicity [non-Hispanic whites (NHWs), non-Hispanic blacks (NHBs), and Hispanic Mexican-Americans) and income [≤185% federal poverty line (FPL), 186-400% FPL, and >400% FPL]. With the Nielsen data, we compared 2000-2013 trends in calories purchased from CPGs (obtained from stores) across brands by race/ethnicity (NHW, NHB, and Hispanic) and income. We conducted random-effect models to derive adjusted trends and differences in calories purchased (708,175 observations from 64,709 unique households) and tested whether trends were heterogeneous by race/ethnicity or income.
Store-bought foods and beverages represented the largest component of dietary intake, with greater decreases in energy intakes in nonstore sources for foods and in store sources for beverages. Beverages from stores consistently decreased in all subpopulations. However, in adjusted models, reductions in CPG calories purchased in 2009-2012 were slower for NHB and low-income households than for NHW and high-income households, respectively. The decline in calories from name-brand food purchases was slower among NHB, Hispanic, and lowest-income households. NHW and high-income households had the highest absolute calories purchased in 2000.
Across 2 large data sources, we found decreases in intake and purchases of beverages from stores across racial/ethnic and income groups. However, potentially beneficial reductions in calories purchased were more pronounced in some subgroups over others.
从商店获取的食品和饮料在种族/族裔以及收入方面的差异是否会随着时间的推移导致热量摄入的差异尚不清楚。
我们试图确定从商店购买的消费品(CPG)中获取的热量是否存在差异,品牌(名牌与自有品牌相比)是否重要,以及差异是否随时间发生了变化。
我们使用了美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)中儿童家庭的个人饮食摄入数据,以及尼尔森家庭扫描(Nielsen Homescan)中儿童家庭购买CPG的数据。利用NHANES,我们按种族/族裔[非西班牙裔白人(NHW)、非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)和西班牙裔墨西哥裔美国人]和收入[≤185%联邦贫困线(FPL)、186 - 400% FPL和>400% FPL]比较了2003 - 2006年和2009 - 2012年来自商店和非商店来源的调查加权能量摄入量。利用尼尔森数据,我们按种族/族裔(NHW、NHB和西班牙裔)和收入比较了2000 - 2013年从CPG(从商店购买)中购买的热量趋势。我们进行了随机效应模型以得出购买热量的调整趋势和差异(来自64,709个独特家庭的708,175条观测数据),并测试趋势是否因种族/族裔或收入而异质。
商店购买的食品和饮料是饮食摄入的最大组成部分,非商店来源的食品和商店来源的饮料的能量摄入量下降幅度更大。商店里的饮料在所有亚人群中持续减少。然而,在调整后的模型中,2009 - 至2012年,NHB和低收入家庭购买的CPG热量减少速度分别比NHW和高收入家庭慢。NHB、西班牙裔和最低收入家庭购买名牌食品的热量下降速度较慢。2000年,NHW和高收入家庭购买的绝对热量最高。
通过两个大型数据源,我们发现不同种族/族裔和收入群体从商店购买的饮料的摄入量和购买量都有所下降。然而,购买热量的潜在有益减少在一些亚组中比其他亚组更为明显。