Suppr超能文献

按商店类型划分的购买品的营养状况:收入和食品计划参与情况的差异。

Nutritional Profile of Purchases by Store Type: Disparities by Income and Food Program Participation.

机构信息

Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2018 Aug;55(2):167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.024. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Policymakers have focused on the food retail environment for improving the dietary quality for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants. Yet little is known about where SNAP households make food and beverage purchases or how purchases may vary by store type, SNAP participation, and income level. The objective of this study was to examine the association between SNAP-income status (participant, income-eligible non-participant, higher-income non-participant) and healthfulness of household purchases across store types.

METHODS

Data included household packaged food purchases (N=76,458 unique households) from 2010 to 2014, analyzed in 2017 with multivariable adjusted models to examine the nutritional profile of purchases by store type (grocery, convenience, big box, and other stores) for SNAP participating households, income-eligible non-participants, and higher-income non-participants. Outcomes included volume and nutrients (kilocalories, total sugar, saturated fat, and sodium) and calories from food groups.

RESULTS

All households purchased the greatest volume of foods and beverages from grocery stores, followed by big-box and other stores, with relatively little purchased from convenience stores. The largest differences between SNAP participants and non-participants were observed at grocery stores and big-box stores, where SNAP households purchased more calories from starchy vegetables, processed meat, desserts, sweeteners and toppings, total junk food, sugar-sweetened beverages, and milk, than income-eligible and higher-income SNAP non-participants. SNAP purchases also had considerably higher sodium density. Across store types, the nutritional profile of income-eligible non-participants' purchases was similar to higher-income households' purchases.

CONCLUSIONS

More research is needed to identify strategies to improve the nutritional profile of purchases among SNAP households.

摘要

简介

政策制定者一直关注食品零售环境,以改善补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者的饮食质量。然而,人们对 SNAP 家庭在哪里购买食品和饮料,以及购买行为如何因商店类型、SNAP 参与情况和收入水平而有所不同知之甚少。本研究的目的是检验 SNAP-收入状况(参与者、符合收入条件的非参与者、高收入非参与者)与家庭购买各种商店类型食品的健康程度之间的关系。

方法

数据包括 2010 年至 2014 年家庭购买的包装食品(76458 个独特家庭),于 2017 年采用多变量调整模型进行分析,以检验家庭购买各种商店类型(杂货店、便利店、大型超市和其他商店)食品的营养状况,包括参与者、符合收入条件的非参与者和高收入非参与者。结果包括各种食品和饮料的购买量和营养成分(千卡、总糖、饱和脂肪和钠)以及食物组的卡路里摄入量。

结果

所有家庭都从杂货店购买了最多的食品和饮料,其次是大型超市和其他商店,从便利店购买的相对较少。SNAP 参与者和非参与者之间最大的差异是在杂货店和大型超市,SNAP 家庭从淀粉类蔬菜、加工肉类、甜点、甜味剂和浇头、总垃圾食品、含糖饮料和牛奶中购买的卡路里比符合收入条件的和高收入 SNAP 非参与者多。SNAP 购买的食品的钠含量也明显较高。在各种商店类型中,符合收入条件的非参与者的购买食品的营养状况与高收入家庭的购买食品的营养状况相似。

结论

需要进一步研究,以确定改善 SNAP 家庭购买食品的营养状况的策略。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Data: Why Disclosure Is Needed.补充营养援助计划数据:为什么需要披露。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Dec;109(12):1659-1663. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305350. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

5
Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat.食用红肉和加工肉类的致癌性。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1599-600. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00444-1. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
6
The Nutrient Content of U.S. Household Food Purchases by Store Type.按商店类型划分的美国家庭食品购买的营养成分
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Feb;50(2):180-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验