Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Aug;55(2):167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.024. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
Policymakers have focused on the food retail environment for improving the dietary quality for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants. Yet little is known about where SNAP households make food and beverage purchases or how purchases may vary by store type, SNAP participation, and income level. The objective of this study was to examine the association between SNAP-income status (participant, income-eligible non-participant, higher-income non-participant) and healthfulness of household purchases across store types.
Data included household packaged food purchases (N=76,458 unique households) from 2010 to 2014, analyzed in 2017 with multivariable adjusted models to examine the nutritional profile of purchases by store type (grocery, convenience, big box, and other stores) for SNAP participating households, income-eligible non-participants, and higher-income non-participants. Outcomes included volume and nutrients (kilocalories, total sugar, saturated fat, and sodium) and calories from food groups.
All households purchased the greatest volume of foods and beverages from grocery stores, followed by big-box and other stores, with relatively little purchased from convenience stores. The largest differences between SNAP participants and non-participants were observed at grocery stores and big-box stores, where SNAP households purchased more calories from starchy vegetables, processed meat, desserts, sweeteners and toppings, total junk food, sugar-sweetened beverages, and milk, than income-eligible and higher-income SNAP non-participants. SNAP purchases also had considerably higher sodium density. Across store types, the nutritional profile of income-eligible non-participants' purchases was similar to higher-income households' purchases.
More research is needed to identify strategies to improve the nutritional profile of purchases among SNAP households.
政策制定者一直关注食品零售环境,以改善补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与者的饮食质量。然而,人们对 SNAP 家庭在哪里购买食品和饮料,以及购买行为如何因商店类型、SNAP 参与情况和收入水平而有所不同知之甚少。本研究的目的是检验 SNAP-收入状况(参与者、符合收入条件的非参与者、高收入非参与者)与家庭购买各种商店类型食品的健康程度之间的关系。
数据包括 2010 年至 2014 年家庭购买的包装食品(76458 个独特家庭),于 2017 年采用多变量调整模型进行分析,以检验家庭购买各种商店类型(杂货店、便利店、大型超市和其他商店)食品的营养状况,包括参与者、符合收入条件的非参与者和高收入非参与者。结果包括各种食品和饮料的购买量和营养成分(千卡、总糖、饱和脂肪和钠)以及食物组的卡路里摄入量。
所有家庭都从杂货店购买了最多的食品和饮料,其次是大型超市和其他商店,从便利店购买的相对较少。SNAP 参与者和非参与者之间最大的差异是在杂货店和大型超市,SNAP 家庭从淀粉类蔬菜、加工肉类、甜点、甜味剂和浇头、总垃圾食品、含糖饮料和牛奶中购买的卡路里比符合收入条件的和高收入 SNAP 非参与者多。SNAP 购买的食品的钠含量也明显较高。在各种商店类型中,符合收入条件的非参与者的购买食品的营养状况与高收入家庭的购买食品的营养状况相似。
需要进一步研究,以确定改善 SNAP 家庭购买食品的营养状况的策略。