Suppr超能文献

PAS-MRI和Q球与经验性多b值HARDI的多纤维可重复性比较。

Comparison of Multi-Fiber Reproducibility of PAS-MRI and Q-ball With Empirical Multiple b-Value HARDI.

作者信息

Nath Vishwesh, Schilling Kurt G, Blaber Justin A, Ding Zhaohua, Anderson Adam W, Landman Bennett A

机构信息

Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2017 Feb 11;10133. doi: 10.1117/12.2254736. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

Abstract

Crossing fibers are prevalent in human brains and a subject of intense interest for neuroscience. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can resolve tissue orientation but is blind to crossing fibers. Many advanced diffusion-weighted magnetic resolution imaging (MRI) approaches have been presented to extract crossing-fibers from high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI), but the relative sensitivity and specificity of approaches remains unclear. Here, we examine two leading approaches (PAS and q-ball) in the context of a large-scale, single subject reproducibility study. A single healthy individual was scanned 11 times with 96 diffusion weighted directions and 10 reference volumes for each of five b-values (1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000 s/mm) for a total of 5830 volumes (over the course of three sessions). We examined the reproducibility of the number of fibers per voxel, volume fraction, and crossing-fiber angles. For each method, we determined the minimum resolvable angle for each acquisition. Reproducibility of fiber counts per voxel was generally high (80% consensus for PAS and ~70% for q-ball), but there was substantial bias between individual repetitions and model estimated with all data (10% lower consensus for PAS and ~15% lower for q-ball). Both PAS and q-ball predominantly discovered fibers crossing at near 90 degrees, but reproducibility was higher for PAS across most measures. Within voxels with low anisotropy, q-ball finds more intra-voxel structure; meanwhile, PAS resolves multiple fibers at greater than 75 degrees for more voxels. These results can inform researchers when deciding between HARDI approaches or interpreting findings across studies.

摘要

交叉纤维在人类大脑中普遍存在,是神经科学领域备受关注的研究对象。扩散张量成像(DTI)能够解析组织方向,但对交叉纤维却视而不见。目前已经提出了许多先进的扩散加权磁共振成像(MRI)方法,用于从高角分辨率扩散成像(HARDI)中提取交叉纤维,但这些方法的相对敏感性和特异性仍不明确。在此,我们在大规模单受试者可重复性研究的背景下,对两种主要方法(PAS和q球)进行了研究。一名健康个体接受了11次扫描,扫描时采用96个扩散加权方向,并针对五个b值(1000、1500、2000、2500、3000 s/mm²)中的每一个获取10个参考体积,总共获取了5830个体积(分三个阶段进行)。我们研究了每个体素中纤维数量、体积分数和交叉纤维角度的可重复性。对于每种方法,我们确定了每次采集的最小可分辨角度。每个体素中纤维计数的可重复性总体较高(PAS约为80%一致,q球约为70%),但个体重复测量与使用所有数据估计的模型之间存在显著偏差(PAS的一致率低约10%,q球低约15%)。PAS和q球主要发现近90度交叉的纤维,但在大多数测量指标上,PAS的可重复性更高。在各向异性较低的体素中,q球发现更多的体素内结构;与此同时,PAS能在更多体素中分辨出大于75度的多根纤维。这些结果可为研究人员在选择HARDI方法或解释不同研究结果时提供参考。

相似文献

7
Q-ball imaging.Q球成像
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Dec;52(6):1358-72. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20279.
10
Evaluation of the accuracy and angular resolution of q-ball imaging.q球成像的准确性和角分辨率评估。
Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 1;42(1):262-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.053. Epub 2008 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

3
Evaluation of the accuracy and angular resolution of q-ball imaging.q球成像的准确性和角分辨率评估。
Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 1;42(1):262-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.053. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
9
Q-ball imaging.Q球成像
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Dec;52(6):1358-72. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20279.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验