Nigro Lorenzo, Donnarumma Pasquale, Tarantino Roberto, Rullo Marika, Santoro Antonio, Delfini Roberto
1Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2Department of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
J Spine Surg. 2017 Jun;3(2):212-216. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.06.01.
BACKGROUND: Cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard exam in the assessment of patients affected by cervical myelopathy and is very useful in planning the operation. Herein we present a series of patients affected by long tract symptoms who underwent dynamic MRI in addition to the static exam. METHODS: In the period between March 2010 and March 2012, three-hundred-ten patients referred to our department since affected by neck/arm pain or symptoms related to cervical myelopathy. Thirty-eight patients complained "long-tract symptoms" related to cervical myelopathy. This series of patients was enrolled in the study. All patients underwent clinical and neurological exam. In all the cases, a static and dynamic cervical MRI was executed using a 3.0-T superconducting MR unit (Intera, Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands). The dynamic exam was performed with as much neck flexion and extension the patient could achieve alone. On T2-weigthed MRI each level was assessed independently by two neuroradiologists and Muhle scale was applied. RESULTS: According to Muhle's classification of spinal cord compressions, static MRI demonstrated 156 findings: 96 (61.54%) anterior and 60 (38.46%) posterior. Dynamic MRI showed 186 spinal cord compressions: 81 (43.5%) anterior and 105 (56.5%) posterior. The anterior compressions were: grade 1 in 23 cases (28.4%), grade 2 in 52 cases (64.2%), grade 3 in 6 cases (7.4%). The posterior compressions were: 32 (30.48%) of grade 1, 60 (57.14%) of grade 2, 13 (12.38%) of grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic MRI demonstrated a major number of findings and spinal cord compressions compared to the static exam. Finally, we consider the dynamic exam able to provide useful information in these patients, but we suggest a careful evaluation of the findings in the extension exam since they are probably over-expressed.
J Spine Surg. 2017-6
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2017-7
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014-2
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022-9-22
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020-2-7
Neurospine. 2019-9
Glob Adv Health Med. 2019-5-16
BMJ Case Rep. 2018-5-14
World J Radiol. 2014-10-28
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014-2
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998-10