Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):2791-2800. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4153-6. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
Purpose This study was conducted in order to systematically review the costs of hip fractures globally and identify drivers of differences in costs. Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify studies reporting patient level fragility hip fracture costs between 1990 and 2015. We extracted data on the participants and costs from these studies. Cost data concerning the index hospitalisation were pooled, and a meta-regression was used to examine its potential drivers. We also pooled data on the first-year costs following hip fracture and considered healthcare, social care as well as other cost categories if reported by studies. Results One hundred and thirteen studies reported costs of hip fracture based on patient level data. Patients developing complications as well as patients enrolled in intervention arms of comparative studies were found to have significantly higher costs compared to the controls. The pooled estimate of the cost for the index hospitalisation was $10,075. Health and social care costs at 12 months were $43,669 with inpatient costs being their major driver. Meta-regression analysis identified age, gender and geographic region as being significantly associated with the differences in costs for the index hospitalisation. Conclusion Hip fracture poses a significant economic burden and variation exists in their costs across different regions. We found that there was a considerable variation across studies in terms of study design, methodology, follow-up period, costs considered and results reported that highlights the need for more standardisation in this area of research.
目的 本研究旨在系统地回顾全球髋部骨折的成本,并确定成本差异的驱动因素。
方法 进行了系统评价,以确定 1990 年至 2015 年期间报告患者水平脆性髋部骨折成本的研究。我们从这些研究中提取了有关参与者和成本的数据。对索引住院的成本数据进行了汇总,并使用元回归分析来检验其潜在的驱动因素。我们还汇总了髋部骨折后第一年的成本数据,并考虑了研究报告的医疗保健、社会护理以及其他成本类别。
结果 113 项研究报告了基于患者水平数据的髋部骨折成本。与对照组相比,患有并发症的患者和参与比较研究干预组的患者的成本明显更高。索引住院的成本汇总估计为 10075 美元。12 个月时的健康和社会护理成本为 43669 美元,住院费用是其主要驱动因素。元回归分析确定年龄、性别和地理位置与索引住院费用的差异显著相关。
结论 髋部骨折造成了巨大的经济负担,不同地区的成本存在差异。我们发现,研究设计、方法、随访期、考虑的成本和报告的结果在不同研究之间存在相当大的差异,这突出表明需要在该研究领域进行更多的标准化。