Suppr超能文献

关注要点:对PubMed和PubMed Central中编辑关注表达的描述性研究。

Concern noted: A descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed Central.

作者信息

Vaught Melissa, Jordan Diana C, Bastian Hilda

机构信息

PubMed Commons, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD USA.

出版信息

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017;2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0030-2. Epub 2017 May 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An editorial expression of concern (EEoC) is issued by editors or publishers to draw attention to potential problems in a publication, without itself constituting a retraction or correction.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), and Google Scholar to identify EEoCs issued for publications in PubMed and PMC up to 22 August 2016. We also searched the archives of the Retraction Watch blog, some journal and publisher websites, and studies of EEoCs. In addition, we searched for retractions of EEoCs and affected articles in PubMed up to 8 December 2016. We analyzed overall historical trends, as well as reported reasons and subsequent editorial actions related to EEoCs issued between August 2014 and August 2016.

RESULTS

After screening 5,076 records, we identified 230 EEoCs that affect 300 publications indexed in PubMed, the earliest issued in 1985. Half of the primary EEoCs were issued between 2014 and 2016 (52%). We found evidence of some EEoCs that had been removed by the publisher without leaving a record and some were not submitted for PubMed or PMC indexing. A minority of publications affected by EEoCs had been retracted by early December 2016 (25%). For the subset of 92 EEoCs issued between August 2014 and August 2016, affecting 99 publications, the rate of retraction was similar (29%). The majority of EEoCs were issued because of concerns with validity of data, methods, or interpretation of the publication (68%), and 31% of cases remained open. Issues with images were raised in 40% of affected publications. Ongoing monitoring after the study identified another 17 EEoCs to year's end in 2016, increasing the number of EEoCs to 247 and publications in PubMed known to be affected by EEoCs to 320 at the end of 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

EEoCs have been rare publishing events in the biomedical literature, but their use has been increasing. Most have not led to retractions, and many remain unresolved. Lack of prominence and inconsistencies in management of EEoCs reduce the ability of these notices to alert the scientific community to potentially serious problems in publications. EEoCs will be made identifiable in PubMed in 2017.

摘要

背景

编辑或出版商会发布编辑关注声明(EEoC),以引起对某一出版物潜在问题的关注,但其本身并不构成撤稿或勘误。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、PubMed Central(PMC)和谷歌学术,以识别截至2016年8月22日在PubMed和PMC上发布的针对出版物的EEoC。我们还检索了Retraction Watch博客的存档、一些期刊和出版商网站以及关于EEoC的研究。此外,我们检索了截至2016年12月8日在PubMed上EEoC及受影响文章的撤稿情况。我们分析了总体历史趋势,以及与2014年8月至2016年8月期间发布的EEoC相关的报告原因和后续编辑行动。

结果

在筛选了5076条记录后,我们识别出230条EEoC,这些EEoC影响了PubMed索引的300种出版物,最早发布于1985年。一半的主要EEoC是在2014年至2016年期间发布的(52%)。我们发现有证据表明一些EEoC已被出版商删除且未留下记录,还有一些未提交至PubMed或PMC进行索引。到2016年12月初,受EEoC影响的少数出版物已被撤稿(25%)。对于2014年8月至2016年8月期间发布的92条EEoC子集,影响了99种出版物,撤稿率相似(29%)。大多数EEoC是由于对出版物数据、方法或解释的有效性存在担忧而发布的(68%),31%的案例仍未解决。40%的受影响出版物中出现了图像问题。该研究之后的持续监测在2016年底又识别出17条EEoC,使EEoC数量增加到247条,2016年底PubMed中已知受EEoC影响的出版物数量增加到320种。

结论

EEoC在生物医学文献中一直是罕见的出版事件,但其使用一直在增加。大多数EEoC并未导致撤稿,许多问题仍未解决。EEoC缺乏显著地位以及管理上的不一致性降低了这些声明提醒科学界注意出版物中潜在严重问题的能力。EEoC将于2017年在PubMed中可识别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9968/5803630/ed571fb2c109/41073_2017_30_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验