Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Mar;79(3):1661-1673. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26830. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
The aim of the 2016 quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reconstruction challenge was to test the ability of various QSM algorithms to recover the underlying susceptibility from phase data faithfully.
Gradient-echo images of a healthy volunteer acquired at 3T in a single orientation with 1.06 mm isotropic resolution. A reference susceptibility map was provided, which was computed using the susceptibility tensor imaging algorithm on data acquired at 12 head orientations. Susceptibility maps calculated from the single orientation data were compared against the reference susceptibility map. Deviations were quantified using the following metrics: root mean squared error (RMSE), structure similarity index (SSIM), high-frequency error norm (HFEN), and the error in selected white and gray matter regions.
Twenty-seven submissions were evaluated. Most of the best scoring approaches estimated the spatial frequency content in the ill-conditioned domain of the dipole kernel using compressed sensing strategies. The top 10 maps in each category had similar error metrics but substantially different visual appearance.
Because QSM algorithms were optimized to minimize error metrics, the resulting susceptibility maps suffered from over-smoothing and conspicuity loss in fine features such as vessels. As such, the challenge highlighted the need for better numerical image quality criteria. Magn Reson Med 79:1661-1673, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2016 年定量磁化率映射(QSM)重建挑战赛的目的是测试各种 QSM 算法从相位数据忠实地恢复潜在磁化率的能力。
使用梯度回波图像在单方向上采集 3T 的健康志愿者数据,各向同性分辨率为 1.06 毫米。提供了参考磁化率图,该图是使用在 12 个头方向采集的数据通过磁化率张量成像算法计算得出的。从单方向数据计算出的磁化率图与参考磁化率图进行了比较。使用以下指标量化偏差:均方根误差(RMSE)、结构相似性指数(SSIM)、高频误差范数(HFEN)以及选定的白质和灰质区域的误差。
评估了 27 项提交的结果。大多数得分最高的方法使用压缩感知策略估计偶极子核的病态域中的空间频率内容。每个类别中排名前十的图谱具有相似的误差指标,但视觉外观却有很大不同。
由于 QSM 算法是为最小化误差指标而优化的,因此得到的磁化率图在血管等精细特征中存在过度平滑和明显损失的问题。因此,该挑战赛突出了需要更好的数值图像质量标准。磁共振医学 79:1661-1673, 2018. © 2017 国际磁共振学会。