• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纵向判别分析中使用可信区间的动态分类

Dynamic classification using credible intervals in longitudinal discriminant analysis.

作者信息

Hughes David M, Komárek Arnošt, Bonnett Laura J, Czanner Gabriela, García-Fiñana Marta

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K.

Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2017 Oct 30;36(24):3858-3874. doi: 10.1002/sim.7397. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1002/sim.7397
PMID:28762546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5655752/
Abstract

Recently developed methods of longitudinal discriminant analysis allow for classification of subjects into prespecified prognostic groups using longitudinal history of both continuous and discrete biomarkers. The classification uses Bayesian estimates of the group membership probabilities for each prognostic group. These estimates are derived from a multivariate generalised linear mixed model of the biomarker's longitudinal evolution in each of the groups and can be updated each time new data is available for a patient, providing a dynamic (over time) allocation scheme. However, the precision of the estimated group probabilities differs for each patient and also over time. This precision can be assessed by looking at credible intervals for the group membership probabilities. In this paper, we propose a new allocation rule that incorporates credible intervals for use in context of a dynamic longitudinal discriminant analysis and show that this can decrease the number of false positives in a prognostic test, improving the positive predictive value. We also establish that by leaving some patients unclassified for a certain period, the classification accuracy of those patients who are classified can be improved, giving increased confidence to clinicians in their decision making. Finally, we show that determining a stopping rule dynamically can be more accurate than specifying a set time point at which to decide on a patient's status. We illustrate our methodology using data from patients with epilepsy and show how patients who fail to achieve adequate seizure control are more accurately identified using credible intervals compared to existing methods.

摘要

最近开发的纵向判别分析方法允许使用连续和离散生物标志物的纵向历史将受试者分类到预先指定的预后组中。该分类使用每个预后组的组成员概率的贝叶斯估计。这些估计值来自生物标志物在每个组中的纵向演变的多元广义线性混合模型,并且每次有患者的新数据时都可以更新,提供了一种动态(随时间)分配方案。然而,估计的组概率的精度因患者而异,并且也随时间变化。这种精度可以通过查看组成员概率的可信区间来评估。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的分配规则,该规则结合了可信区间,用于动态纵向判别分析的背景下,并表明这可以减少预后测试中的假阳性数量,提高阳性预测值。我们还确定,通过在一段时间内不对某些患者进行分类,可以提高已分类患者的分类准确性,增强临床医生决策的信心。最后,我们表明动态确定停止规则可能比指定决定患者状态的设定时间点更准确。我们使用癫痫患者的数据说明了我们的方法,并展示了与现有方法相比,使用可信区间如何更准确地识别未实现充分癫痫发作控制的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daec/5655752/83ccdaa4ae8c/SIM-36-3858-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daec/5655752/4a1ab0bb18be/SIM-36-3858-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daec/5655752/1663d9079b88/SIM-36-3858-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daec/5655752/45c725850094/SIM-36-3858-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daec/5655752/83ccdaa4ae8c/SIM-36-3858-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daec/5655752/4a1ab0bb18be/SIM-36-3858-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daec/5655752/1663d9079b88/SIM-36-3858-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daec/5655752/45c725850094/SIM-36-3858-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daec/5655752/83ccdaa4ae8c/SIM-36-3858-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic classification using credible intervals in longitudinal discriminant analysis.纵向判别分析中使用可信区间的动态分类
Stat Med. 2017 Oct 30;36(24):3858-3874. doi: 10.1002/sim.7397. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
2
Dynamic longitudinal discriminant analysis using multiple longitudinal markers of different types.利用不同类型的多个纵向标记物进行动态纵向判别分析。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):2060-2080. doi: 10.1177/0962280216674496. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
3
Uncertainty in clinical prediction rules: the value of credible intervals.临床预测规则中的不确定性:可信区间的价值。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Feb;44(2):85-91. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4877. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
4
A comparison of group prediction approaches in longitudinal discriminant analysis.纵向判别分析中组预测方法的比较。
Biom J. 2018 Mar;60(2):307-322. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700013. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
5
Predicting the multi-domain progression of Parkinson's disease: a Bayesian multivariate generalized linear mixed-effect model.预测帕金森病的多领域进展:贝叶斯多变量广义线性混合效应模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 25;17(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0415-4.
6
Evaluation of partial classification algorithms using ROC curves.
Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 2:904-8.
7
Discriminant analysis using a multivariate linear mixed model with a normal mixture in the random effects distribution.使用带有正态混合的随机效应分布的多元线性混合模型进行判别分析。
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 30;29(30):3267-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.3849.
8
Epileptic Seizure Detection Using Lacunarity and Bayesian Linear Discriminant Analysis in Intracranial EEG.基于颅内脑电图的孔隙率和贝叶斯线性判别分析的癫痫发作检测
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Dec;60(12):3375-81. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2254486. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
9
Predictive probability methods for interim monitoring in clinical trials with longitudinal outcomes.用于纵向结局临床试验中中间监测的预测概率方法。
Stat Med. 2018 Jun 30;37(14):2187-2207. doi: 10.1002/sim.7685. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
10
A Bayesian model to estimate the cutoff and the clinical utility of a biomarker assay.一种贝叶斯模型,用于估计生物标志物检测的截止值和临床实用性。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2538-2556. doi: 10.1177/0962280218784778. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Building and validating trend-based multiple sclerosis case definitions: a population-based cohort study for Manitoba, Canada.基于趋势的多发性硬化症病例定义的构建和验证:加拿大曼尼托巴省的一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 15;14(7):e083141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083141.
2
MRI Radiomics Features From Infarction and Cerebrospinal Fluid for Prediction of Cerebral Edema After Acute Ischemic Stroke.基于梗死灶和脑脊液的MRI影像组学特征预测急性缺血性卒中后脑水肿
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Mar 3;14:782036. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.782036. eCollection 2022.
3
A population-based study to develop juvenile arthritis case definitions for administrative health data using model-based dynamic classification.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic longitudinal discriminant analysis using multiple longitudinal markers of different types.利用不同类型的多个纵向标记物进行动态纵向判别分析。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):2060-2080. doi: 10.1177/0962280216674496. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
2
A novel approach to estimation of the time to biomarker threshold: applications to HIV.
Pharm Stat. 2016 Nov;15(6):541-549. doi: 10.1002/pst.1774. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
Personalized screening intervals for biomarkers using joint models for longitudinal and survival data.使用纵向和生存数据联合模型确定生物标志物的个性化筛查间隔。
一项基于人群的研究,旨在使用基于模型的动态分类为行政健康数据开发幼年特发性关节炎病例定义。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 May 16;21(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01296-9.
4
The effect of random-effects misspecification on classification accuracy.随机效应误设对分类准确性的影响。
Int J Biostat. 2021 Mar 26;18(1):279-292. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2019-0159.
5
Investigating imaging network markers of cognitive dysfunction and pharmacoresistance in newly diagnosed epilepsy: a protocol for an observational cohort study in the UK.研究新诊断癫痫患者认知功能障碍和药物抵抗的影像学网络标志物:英国观察性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 16;9(10):e034347. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034347.
6
Identifying patients who will not reachieve remission after breakthrough seizures.识别那些在突破性发作后无法达到缓解的患者。
Epilepsia. 2019 Apr;60(4):774-782. doi: 10.1111/epi.14697. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
7
Identification of patients who will not achieve seizure remission within 5 years on AEDs.识别在 AED 治疗 5 年内无法达到癫痫无发作的患者。
Neurology. 2018 Nov 27;91(22):e2035-e2044. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006564. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
8
Personalized risk-based screening for diabetic retinopathy: A multivariate approach versus the use of stratification rules.基于个体风险的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查:多变量方法与分层规则的应用比较。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Mar;21(3):560-568. doi: 10.1111/dom.13552. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
Biostatistics. 2016 Jan;17(1):149-64. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxv031. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
4
Measures of discrimination for latent group-based trajectory models.基于潜在群体轨迹模型的歧视度量。
J Appl Stat. 2015 Jan;42(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2014.928849.
5
Screening for prostate cancer using multivariate mixed-effects models.使用多变量混合效应模型筛查前列腺癌。
J Appl Stat. 2012 Jun 1;39(6):1151-1175. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2011.644523.
6
Discriminant analysis for repeated measures data: a review.重复测量数据分析的判别分析:综述。
Front Psychol. 2010 Sep 9;1:146. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00146. eCollection 2010.
7
Discriminant analysis using a multivariate linear mixed model with a normal mixture in the random effects distribution.使用带有正态混合的随机效应分布的多元线性混合模型进行判别分析。
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 30;29(30):3267-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.3849.
8
Combining longitudinal discriminant analysis and partial area under the ROC curve to predict non-response to treatment for hepatitis C virus.结合纵向判别分析和 ROC 曲线下部分面积预测丙型肝炎病毒治疗无应答。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Jun;20(3):275-89. doi: 10.1177/0962280209341624. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
9
Classification of therapy resistance based on longitudinal biomarker profiles.基于纵向生物标志物谱的治疗耐药性分类。
Biom J. 2009 Aug;51(4):610-26. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200800157.
10
Discriminant analysis for longitudinal data with multiple continuous responses and possibly missing data.具有多个连续响应且可能存在缺失数据的纵向数据的判别分析。
Biometrics. 2009 Mar;65(1):69-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01016.x. Epub 2008 Mar 24.