Naldemirci Öncel, Wolf Axel, Elam Mark, Lydahl Doris, Moore Lucy, Britten Nicky
Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Institute of Health Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 4;17(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2470-2.
The introduction of innovative models of healthcare does not necessarily mean that they become embedded in everyday clinical practice. This study has two aims: first, to analyse deliberate and emergent strategies adopted by healthcare professionals to overcome barriers to normalization of a specific framework of person-centred care (PCC); and secondly, to explore how the recipients of PCC understand these strategies.
This paper is based on a qualitative study of the implementation of PCC in a Swedish context. It draws on semi-structured interviews with 18 researchers and 17 practitioners who adopted a model of PCC on four different wards and 20 patients who were cared for in one of these wards. Data from these interviews were first coded inductively and emerging themes are analysed in relation to normalization process theory (NPT).
In addition to deliberate strategies, we identify emergent strategies to normalize PCC by (i) creating and sustaining coherence in small but continuously communicating groups (ii) interpreting PCC flexibly when it meets specific local situations and (iii) enforcing teamwork between professional groups. These strategies resulted in patients perceiving PCC as bringing about (i) a sense of ease (ii) appreciation of inter-professional congruity (ii) non-hierarchical communication.
NPT is useful to identify and analyse deliberate and emergent strategies relating to mechanisms of normalization. Emergent strategies should be interpreted not as trivial solutions to problems in implementation, but as a possible repertoire of tools, practices and skills developed in situ. As professionals and patients may have different understandings of implementation, it is also crucial to include patients' perceptions to evaluate outcomes.
引入创新的医疗保健模式并不一定意味着它们会融入日常临床实践。本研究有两个目的:第一,分析医疗保健专业人员为克服以患者为中心的护理(PCC)特定框架正常化的障碍而采取的有意和突发策略;第二,探讨PCC接受者如何理解这些策略。
本文基于对瑞典背景下PCC实施情况的定性研究。它借鉴了对18名研究人员和17名从业者的半结构化访谈,这些人员在四个不同病房采用了PCC模式,以及对在其中一个病房接受护理的20名患者的访谈。这些访谈的数据首先进行归纳编码,并根据正常化过程理论(NPT)分析新出现的主题。
除了有意策略外,我们还确定了通过以下方式使PCC正常化的突发策略:(i)在规模小但持续交流的群体中创造并维持连贯性;(ii)在PCC遇到特定当地情况时灵活解释;(iii)加强专业群体之间的团队合作。这些策略使患者认为PCC带来了(i)轻松感;(ii)对跨专业一致性的认可;(ii)非等级化沟通。
NPT有助于识别和分析与正常化机制相关的有意和突发策略。突发策略不应被视为实施问题的简单解决方案,而应被视为就地开发的一系列可能的工具、实践和技能。由于专业人员和患者对实施可能有不同的理解,纳入患者的看法以评估结果也至关重要。