Suppr超能文献

新方法在成年人和不同社会人口学及健康相关行为阶层中针对关键食物组列表进行膳食摄入量估计的初步评估步骤。

First evaluation steps of a new method for dietary intake estimation regarding a list of key food groups in adults and in different sociodemographic and health-related behaviour strata.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health,School of Medicine,University of Seville, Institute of Anatomy,3rd floor,Sánchez-Pizjuán Avenue,Seville 41009,Spain.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2017 Oct;20(15):2660-2669. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001641. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A new method known as 'current-day dietary recall' (current-day recall) is based on an application for mobile phones called 'electronic 12 h dietary recall' (e-12HR). This new method was designed to rank participants into categories of habitual intake regarding a series of key food groups. The present study compared current-day recall against a previously validated short paper FFQ.

DESIGN

Participants recorded the consumption of selected food groups using e-12HR during twenty-eight consecutive days and then filled out a short paper FFQ at the end of the study period. To evaluate the association and agreement between both methods, Spearman's correlation coefficients (SCC), cross-classification analysis and weighted kappa statistics (κ w) were used.

SETTING

Andalusia, Spain, Southern Europe.

SUBJECTS

University students and employees over the age of 18 years.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-seven participants completed the study (64·2 % female, 35·8 % male). For all particpants, for all food group intakes, the mean SCC was 0·70 (SCC≥0·62 were observed for all strata); the mean percentage of participants cross-classified into categories of 'exact agreement+adjacent' was 90·1 % (percentages≥87·8 % were observed for all strata); and the mean κ w was 0·55 (κ w≥0·53 in ten of the twelve strata).

CONCLUSIONS

For the whole sample and for all strata thereof, the current-day recall has good agreement with the previously validated short paper FFQ for assessing food group intakes, rendering it a useful method for ranking individuals.

摘要

目的

一种新的方法称为“当前饮食回忆”(current-day recall),它基于一个名为“电子 12 小时饮食回忆”(e-12HR)的手机应用程序。这种新方法旨在将参与者分为一系列关键食物组的习惯性摄入类别。本研究将当前饮食回忆与之前经过验证的短问卷式食物频率问卷(FFQ)进行了比较。

设计

参与者在连续二十八天内使用 e-12HR 记录选定食物组的消费情况,然后在研究结束时填写短问卷式 FFQ。为了评估两种方法之间的关联和一致性,使用了 Spearman 相关系数(SCC)、交叉分类分析和加权 kappa 统计量(κ w)。

地点

西班牙南部的安达卢西亚。

对象

年龄在 18 岁以上的大学生和员工。

结果

共有 187 名参与者完成了研究(64.2%为女性,35.8%为男性)。对于所有参与者,对于所有食物组的摄入量,SCC 的平均值为 0.70(所有分层中都观察到 SCC≥0.62);90.1%的参与者被交叉分类为“完全一致+相邻”类别的平均百分比(所有分层中都观察到≥87.8%的百分比);κ w 的平均值为 0.55(在十二个分层中的十个中,κ w≥0.53)。

结论

对于整个样本和所有分层,当前饮食回忆与之前经过验证的短问卷式 FFQ 评估食物组摄入量具有良好的一致性,使其成为一种有用的个体分类方法。

相似文献

5
Electronic Dietary Intake Assessment (e-DIA): relative validity of a mobile phone application to measure intake of food groups.
Br J Nutr. 2016 Jun;115(12):2219-26. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516001525. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Assessment of dietary calcium intake of university students: a pilot study in Turkey.
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Mar 30;13(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0447-3.
8
Relative Validity and Reproducibility of an Interviewer Administered 14-Item FFQ to Estimate Flavonoid Intake Among Older Adults with Mild-Moderate Dementia.
J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 Apr-Sep;36(2-3):134-147. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2017.1321080. Epub 2017 May 23.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Can a dietary quality score derived from a short-form FFQ assess dietary quality in UK adult population surveys?
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Nov;19(16):2915-2923. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016001099. Epub 2016 May 16.
6
Validity and calibration of the FFQ used in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study.
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Sep;19(13):2357-68. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000690. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
7
Reproducibility of the Online Food4Me Food-Frequency Questionnaire for Estimating Dietary Intakes across Europe.
J Nutr. 2016 May;146(5):1068-75. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.225078. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
10
A Mobile Phone App for Dietary Intake Assessment in Adolescents: An Evaluation Study.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Nov 3;3(4):e93. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4804.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验