Banerjee A, Frencken J E, Schwendicke F, Innes N P T
Conservative &MI Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's Hospital, King's Health Partners, London, Floor 26, Tower Wing, Guy's Dental Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dental Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Br Dent J. 2017 Aug 11;223(3):215-222. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.672.
The International Caries Consensus Collaboration (ICCC) presented recommendations on terminology, on carious tissue removal and on managing cavitated carious lesions. It identified 'dental caries' as the name of the disease that dentists should manage, and the importance of controlling the activity of existing cavitated lesions to preserve hard tissues, maintain pulp sensibility and retain functional teeth in the long term. The ICCC recommended the level of hardness (soft, leathery, firm, and hard dentine) as the criterion for determining the clinical consequences of the disease and defined new strategies for carious tissue removal: 1) Selective removal of carious tissue - including selective removal to soft dentine and selective removal to firm dentine; 2) stepwise removal - including stage 1, selective removal to soft dentine, and stage 2, selective removal to firm dentine 6 to 12 months later; and 3) non-selective removal to hard dentine - formerly known as complete caries removal (a traditional approach no longer recommended). Adoption of these terms will facilitate improved understanding and communication among researchers, within dental educators and the wider clinical dentistry community. Controlling the disease in cavitated carious lesions should be attempted using methods which are aimed at biofilm removal or control first. Only when cavitated carious dentine lesions are either non-cleansable or can no longer be sealed, are restorative interventions indicated. Carious tissue is removed purely to create conditions for long-lasting restorations. Bacterially contaminated or demineralised tissues close to the pulp do not need to be removed. The evidence and, therefore these recommendations, supports minimally invasive carious lesion management, delaying entry to, and slowing down, the destructive restorative cycle by preserving tooth tissue, maintaining pulp sensibility and retaining the functional tooth-restoration complex long-term.
国际龋病共识协作组(ICCC)提出了关于术语、龋坏组织去除以及龋洞型龋损管理的建议。该组织确定“龋齿”为牙医应处理的疾病名称,并强调了控制现有龋洞型病损的活动性对于长期保存硬组织、维持牙髓敏感性以及保留功能牙的重要性。ICCC建议将硬度水平(软、似皮革、硬和坚硬牙本质)作为确定该疾病临床后果的标准,并定义了龋坏组织去除的新策略:1)选择性去除龋坏组织——包括选择性去除至软牙本质和选择性去除至硬牙本质;2)分步去除——包括第1阶段,选择性去除至软牙本质,以及第2阶段,6至12个月后选择性去除至硬牙本质;3)非选择性去除至坚硬牙本质——以前称为完全龋坏去除(一种不再推荐的传统方法)。采用这些术语将有助于研究人员、牙科教育工作者以及更广泛的临床牙科界之间增进理解和交流。应首先尝试使用旨在去除或控制生物膜的方法来控制龋洞型龋损中的疾病。只有当龋洞型龋坏牙本质病变无法清洁或无法再密封时,才需要进行修复干预。去除龋坏组织纯粹是为了创造持久修复的条件。靠近牙髓的受细菌污染或脱矿的组织无需去除。这些证据以及因此得出的这些建议支持微创龋损管理,通过保留牙齿组织、维持牙髓敏感性以及长期保留功能性牙齿修复复合体来延迟进入并减缓破坏性修复循环。