国家幸福政策与人类情感的加权处理方法。
National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings.
作者信息
O'Donnell Gus, Oswald Andrew J
机构信息
House of Lords, London, SW1A 0PW, United Kingdom.
Frontier Economics, London, United Kingdom.
出版信息
Ecol Econ. 2015 Dec;120:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
Abstract
Governments are becoming interested in the concept of human well-being and how truly to assess it. As an alternative to traditional economic measures, some nations have begun to collect information on citizens' happiness, life satisfaction, and other psychological scores. Yet how could such data actually be used? This paper is a cautious attempt to contribute to thinking on that question. It suggests a possible weighting method to calculate first-order changes in society's well-being, discusses some of the potential principles of democratic 'well-being policy', and (as an illustrative example) reports data on how sub-samples of citizens believe feelings might be weighted.
摘要
各国政府正逐渐对人类福祉的概念以及如何真正评估它产生兴趣。作为传统经济衡量指标的替代方案，一些国家已开始收集有关公民幸福感、生活满意度及其他心理得分的信息。然而，这些数据究竟该如何使用呢？本文是对思考这一问题的一次谨慎尝试。它提出了一种可能的加权方法来计算社会福祉的一阶变化，讨论了民主“福祉政策”的一些潜在原则，并且（作为一个示例）报告了关于公民子样本如何看待情感可能被加权的数据。
相似文献
1
National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings.国家幸福政策与人类情感的加权处理方法。
Ecol Econ. 2015 Dec;120:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
2
Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being.超越金钱：走向幸福经济。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Jul;5(1):1-31. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x. Epub 2004 Jul 1.
3
From passive subject to active agent: the potential of Citizens' Juries for nursing research.从被动参与者到积极推动者：公民陪审团在护理研究中的潜力。
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Oct;27(7):788-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
4
Does fiscal discipline towards subnational governments affect citizens' well-being? Evidence on health.地方政府财政纪律是否影响公民福祉？以健康为例的证据。
Health Econ. 2014 Feb;23(2):199-224. doi: 10.1002/hec.2910. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
5
The scientific value of numerical measures of human feelings.人类情感数值测量的科学价值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 18;119(42):e2210412119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210412119. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
6
[Social equity in the health domain].[健康领域的社会公平]
Cad Saude Publica. 1990 Oct-Dec;6(4):400-21. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x1990000400004. Epub 2005 Jun 13.
7
A conceptual approach to a citizens' observatory--supporting community-based environmental governance.公民观测站的概念性方法——支持基于社区的环境治理
Environ Health. 2014 Dec 12;13:107. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-13-107.
8
Thought recognition, locus of control, and adolescent well-being.思维认知、控制点与青少年幸福感。
Adolescence. 2000 Autumn;35(139):531-50.
9
Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?幸福感在生命周期中呈U形吗？
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Apr;66(8):1733-49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
10
Hypertension and happiness across nations.各国的高血压与幸福感
J Health Econ. 2008 Mar;27(2):218-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
引用本文的文献
1
The Welleye: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding and Promoting Wellbeing.《健康之眼：理解与促进幸福的概念框架》
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 29;12:716572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716572. eCollection 2021.
2
Life satisfaction and sustainability: a policy framework.生活满意度与可持续性：一个政策框架。
SN Soc Sci. 2021;1(7):176. doi: 10.1007/s43545-021-00185-8. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Associations between psychological wellbeing, depression, general anxiety, perceived social support, tooth brushing frequency and oral ulcers among adults resident in Nigeria during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.尼日利亚成年人在 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间的心理健康、抑郁、普遍焦虑、感知社会支持、刷牙频率和口腔溃疡之间的关联。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 13;21(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01871-y.
4
Years of good life is a well-being indicator designed to serve research on sustainability.多年健康寿命是一项福祉指标，旨在为可持续性研究服务。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 23;118(12). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907351118.
5
The economy of wellbeing: what is it and what are the implications for health?健康经济：它是什么，对健康有什么影响？
BMJ. 2020 Jun 16;369:m1874. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1874.
6
A cross-sectional analysis of green space prevalence and mental wellbeing in England.英国绿地普及率与心理健康的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 17;17(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4401-x.
本文引用的文献
1
The Remarkable Changes in the Science of Subjective Well-Being.主观幸福感科学的显著变化。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov;8(6):663-6. doi: 10.1177/1745691613507583.
2
How Can Measures of Subjective Well-Being Be Used to Inform Public Policy?主观幸福感的衡量标准如何用于为公共政策提供信息？
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):71-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00030.x.
3
Beyond Happiness and Satisfaction: Toward Well-Being Indices Based on Stated Preference.超越幸福与满足：迈向基于陈述偏好的幸福指数
Am Econ Rev. 2014 Sep;104(9):2698-2735. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.9.2698.
4
Cross-national and historical differences in subjective well-being.主观幸福感的跨国和历史差异。
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):330-40. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt188. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
5
Are Americans Really Less Happy With Their Incomes?美国人真的对自己的收入不那么满意吗？
Rev Income Wealth. 2013 Mar 1;59(1):44-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00532.x.
6
Addressing the Social Determinants of Subjective Wellbeing: The Latest Challenge for Social Policy.应对主观幸福感的社会决定因素：社会政策的最新挑战。
J Soc Policy. 2013 Jul;42(3):541-565. doi: 10.1017/S0047279413000202.
7
The Oregon experiment--effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes.俄勒冈实验——医疗补助对临床结果的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1713-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1212321.
8
Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data.生活在绿化更好的城市区域会更快乐吗？基于面板数据的固定效应分析。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):920-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797612464659. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
9
What Do You Think Would Make You Happier? What Do You Think You Would Choose?().你认为什么会让你更快乐？你认为你会选择什么？（）
Am Econ Rev. 2012 Aug;102(5):2083-2110. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.5.2083.
10
Estimating the influence of life satisfaction and positive affect on later income using sibling fixed effects.利用兄弟姐妹固定效应估计生活满意度和积极情绪对后期收入的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 4;109(49):19953-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211437109. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
Zotero 插件