Risser Ralf, Haindl Gudrun, Ståhl Agneta
FACTUM OHG, Danhausergasse 6/4, 1040 Vienna, Austria.
Department of Spatial Development, Infrastructure and Environmental Planning, Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology, Operngasse 11/6, 1040 Vienna, Austria.
Eur J Ageing. 2010 Jun 3;7(2):69-80. doi: 10.1007/s10433-010-0146-4. eCollection 2010 Jun.
The aim of this study was to picture perceived problems amongst older citizens in the traffic environment. Moreover, answers to the question why measures that are known to be efficient concerning the mobility of senior citizens are often not implemented. Eight EU countries participated in the study, involving both senior citizens and experts (researchers, decision makers and practitioners who deal with all aspects of seniors' mobility). Focus group interviews and personal interviews involving 487 senior citizens and 225 experts were carried out in order to chart problems. These were followed by quantitative surveys with 3,309 senior citizens and 490 experts that had the scope to measure the distribution of charted problems in the population. Finally, five workshops were carried out in order to discuss results and to formulate assumptions why promising measures are not implemented, as it appears. Barriers to mobility are by both experts and senior citizens attributed to traffic and infrastructure characteristics, to legal issues, to vehicle design problems, to inter-personal and inter-generational frictions, to lacking lobby power, but also to individual health problems. In order to improve mobility it is suggested by both senior citizens and experts to enforce vehicle speeds. Both groups also agree that public transport vehicles should be brought into an appropriate standard (low floor vehicles, kneeling busses). Senior citizens more than the experts ask for measures to support the sense of security and safety in the public space (police should be visible, appropriate design of infrastructure, public lighting).
本研究的目的是描绘老年公民在交通环境中所感知到的问题。此外,还要回答为何那些已知对老年人出行有效的措施常常未得到实施这一问题。八个欧盟国家参与了该研究,涉及老年公民和专家(研究人员、决策者以及处理老年人出行各方面问题的从业者)。为了梳理问题,开展了焦点小组访谈以及涉及487名老年公民和225名专家的个人访谈。随后对3309名老年公民和490名专家进行了定量调查,其范围是衡量所梳理问题在人群中的分布情况。最后,举办了五场研讨会,以讨论研究结果并就为何看起来有前景的措施未得到实施这一情况提出假设。出行障碍在专家和老年公民看来,归因于交通和基础设施特点、法律问题、车辆设计问题、人际和代际摩擦、缺乏游说力量,还有个人健康问题。为了改善出行,老年公民和专家都建议强制规定车辆速度。两组人员还一致认为公共交通车辆应达到适当标准(低地板车辆、可跪式公交车)。与专家相比,老年公民更要求采取措施以增强公共场所的安全感(警察应可见、基础设施设计合理、公共照明良好)。