• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国对哮喘控制的认知:一项横断面研究,比较患者和医疗保健专业人员对哮喘控制的认知与经过验证的 ACT 评分。

Perceptions of asthma control in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study comparing patient and healthcare professionals' perceptions of asthma control with validated ACT scores.

机构信息

Royal Brompton Hospital, London, SW3 6NP, UK.

Boehringer Ingelheim UK, Bracknell, RG12 8YS, UK.

出版信息

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Aug 11;27(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0050-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41533-017-0050-x
PMID:28801654
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5554258/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Perceptions of asthma control often vary between patients and physicians. This cross-sectional survey provided UK-specific data on actual and perceived asthma control in patients (18-75 years) attending routine asthma reviews in primary, secondary and tertiary settings. Differences between healthcare professionals' (HCP) and patients' perceptions of asthma control were evaluated via an online questionnaire and compared to a control-the validated asthma control test (ACT)-which patients completed. Treated patients (at least a short acting ß-agonist) with a documented diagnosis of asthma were enroled and consented within a month of their last appointment. Patients were grouped according to the British Thoracic Society (BTS)/Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 2014 treatment guidelines (BTS/SIGN steps 1-5). A total of 260 patients were screened: 234 were eligible for enrolment: 33, 52, 50, 49 and 50 patients in steps 1-5, respectively. Seventy per cent (164) were women. The percentage of patients aged 45-64 years was 47.4%. HCPs classed 70% (164) as non-smokers. 84.2% of patients and 73.9% of HCPs perceived that asthma was controlled but ACT results suggest that asthma was only controlled in 54.7% of patients (ACT score ≥20). Patients in steps 4 and 5 had the highest levels of uncontrolled asthma. Correct agreement between ACT score with perceptions of controlled or uncontrolled asthma occurred in 67.9% of patients and 68.8% of HCPs; the poorest levels of agreement occurred in patients in steps 4 and 5. Uncontrolled asthma is common in UK patients. High proportions of patients and HCPs have incorrect perceptions of asthma control, especially in relation to patients with asthma in steps 4 and 5.

ASTHMA

MISPERCEPTIONS OF CONTROL ABOUND AMONG UK PATIENTS AND DOCTORS: Asthma patients and their doctors often misperceive whether the disease is under control, according to a British study. Andrew Menzies-Gow from Royal Brompton Hospital in London and Gavin Chiu from Boehringer Ingelheim UK in Bracknell used an online questionnaire to assess perceptions of asthma control among 234 patients and their healthcare providers. All participants had at least intermittent asthma that required occasional treatment; many had more severe disease. The researchers found that 84% of patients and 74% of doctors thought the asthma was well controlled, but results of the Asthma Control Test indicated only 55% of patients objectively achieved disease control. Correct agreement between the validated test and more subjective perceptions occurred in only 68 % of patients and 69% of doctors. Addressing this mismatch could go a long way to improving asthma control among British patients.

摘要

目的

本横断面研究提供了英国在初级、二级和三级医疗机构常规接受哮喘评估的患者(18-75 岁)中实际和感知的哮喘控制的具体数据。通过在线问卷评估了医疗保健专业人员(HCP)和患者对哮喘控制的感知差异,并与患者完成的经验证的哮喘控制测试(ACT)进行了比较。在过去预约后一个月内,记录了诊断为哮喘的接受治疗的患者(至少使用短效β-激动剂)并征得其同意。根据英国胸科协会(BTS)/苏格兰校际指南网络(SIGN)2014 年治疗指南(BTS/SIGN 第 1-5 步),将患者分组。共筛选了 260 名患者:234 名符合入组条件:分别为第 1-5 步的 33、52、50、49 和 50 名患者。70%(164 名)为女性。45-64 岁患者的比例为 47.4%。HCP 将 70%(164 名)归类为不吸烟者。84.2%的患者和 73.9%的 HCP 认为哮喘得到控制,但 ACT 结果表明只有 54.7%的患者(ACT 评分≥20)的哮喘得到控制。第 4 步和第 5 步的患者有最高水平的未控制哮喘。ACT 评分与控制或未控制哮喘的感知之间的正确一致性在 67.9%的患者和 68.8%的 HCP 中发生;在第 4 步和第 5 步的患者中,一致性水平最差。在英国患者中,未控制的哮喘很常见。高比例的患者和 HCP 对哮喘控制存在错误的认识,尤其是在与处于第 4 步和第 5 步的哮喘患者有关时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/0a18687daf8e/41533_2017_50_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/2580d9ac8183/41533_2017_50_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/43b54034cd6b/41533_2017_50_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/e0de6fd8c290/41533_2017_50_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/e781e19c6a37/41533_2017_50_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/0a18687daf8e/41533_2017_50_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/2580d9ac8183/41533_2017_50_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/43b54034cd6b/41533_2017_50_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/e0de6fd8c290/41533_2017_50_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/e781e19c6a37/41533_2017_50_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6680/5554258/0a18687daf8e/41533_2017_50_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of asthma control in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study comparing patient and healthcare professionals' perceptions of asthma control with validated ACT scores.英国对哮喘控制的认知:一项横断面研究,比较患者和医疗保健专业人员对哮喘控制的认知与经过验证的 ACT 评分。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Aug 11;27(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0050-x.
2
The impact of poor asthma control among asthma patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β-agonists in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional analysis.英国接受吸入皮质类固醇加长效β激动剂治疗的哮喘患者中哮喘控制不佳的影响:一项横断面分析。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Mar 9;27(1):17. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0014-1.
3
Parent misperception of control in childhood/adolescent asthma: the Room to Breathe survey.家长对儿童/青少年哮喘控制的误解:呼吸空间调查。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Jan;39(1):90-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00048911. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
4
Heavy to carry: a survey of parents' and healthcare professionals' perceptions of cancer-related fatigue in children and young people.携带不便:一项关于父母和医疗保健专业人员对儿童及青少年癌症相关疲劳认知的调查。
Cancer Nurs. 2005 Jan-Feb;28(1):27-35. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200501000-00004.
5
Explaining the Amount and Consistency of Medical Care and Self-Management Support in Asthma: A Survey of Primary Care Providers in France and the United Kingdom.解释哮喘的医疗保健量和一致性以及自我管理支持:法国和英国初级保健提供者的调查。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Nov-Dec;6(6):1916-1925.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.04.039. Epub 2018 May 9.
6
Real-life prescribing of asthmatic treatments in UK general practice over time using 2014 BTS/SIGN steps.基于 2014 BTS/SIGN 步骤,使用英国普通实践中的真实生活处方来治疗哮喘。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2019 Jul 11;29(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41533-019-0137-7.
7
Asthma treatment needs: a comparison of patients' and health care professionals' perceptions.哮喘治疗需求:患者与医护人员认知的比较
Clin Ther. 2004 Dec;26(12):2141-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.12.017.
8
Predictors of uncontrolled asthma in adult and pediatric patients: analysis of the Asthma Control Characteristics and Prevalence Survey Studies (ACCESS).成人和儿童患者哮喘控制不佳的预测因素:哮喘控制特征与患病率调查研究(ACCESS)分析
J Asthma. 2010 Apr;47(3):257-62. doi: 10.3109/02770900903584019.
9
Patient and Health Care Professional Perceptions of the Experience and Impact of Symptoms of Moderate-to-Severe Crohn's Disease in US and Europe: Results from the Cross-Sectional CONFIDE Study.患者和医护人员对美国和欧洲中重度克罗恩病症状的体验和影响的认知:来自横断面 CONFIDE 研究的结果。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Jul;69(7):2333-2344. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08434-5. Epub 2024 May 3.
10
[Patients with asthma: Disease control, patients' perceptions and observance. Results of the French REALISE™ survey].[哮喘患者:疾病控制、患者认知与依从性。法国REALISE™调查结果]
Rev Mal Respir. 2017 Jan;34(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Asthma control and opportunities to optimize management and the healthcare provider experience using the AsthmaOptimiser online tool in Dutch general practice: the CAPTURE study.在荷兰全科医疗中使用AsthmaOptimiser在线工具控制哮喘及优化管理与医疗服务提供者体验的机会:CAPTURE研究
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2025 Apr 15;35(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s41533-025-00427-9.
2
Health system characteristics and evidence-based asthma care.卫生系统特征与循证哮喘护理
Front Allergy. 2025 Feb 24;6:1528526. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1528526. eCollection 2025.
3
Greenhouse gas emissions associated with suboptimal asthma care in the UK: the SABINA healthCARe-Based envirONmental cost of treatment (CARBON) study.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventing avoidable asthma deaths.预防可避免的哮喘死亡。
Practitioner. 2014 Sep;258(1774):27-31, 3.
2
Maintenance treatment for adults with chronic asthma.成人慢性哮喘的维持治疗。
BMJ. 2014 May 15;348:g3148. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3148.
3
Asthma control and management in 8,000 European patients: the REcognise Asthma and LInk to Symptoms and Experience (REALISE) survey.8000 例欧洲患者的哮喘控制和管理:识别哮喘并将症状和体验联系起来(REALISE)调查。
英国次优哮喘护理相关的温室气体排放:SABINA基于医疗保健的治疗环境成本(CARBON)研究
Thorax. 2024 Feb 27;79(5):412-21. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220259.
4
Non-randomised feasibility study testing a primary care intervention to promote engagement in an online health community for adults with troublesome asthma: protocol.一项针对初级保健干预措施的非随机可行性研究,旨在促进有麻烦的哮喘成年人参与在线健康社区:方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 11;13(7):e073503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073503.
5
Breaking the vicious circle-the Asthma Referral Identifier (ReferID) tool.打破恶性循环——哮喘转诊标识符(ReferID)工具。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2022 Oct 8;32(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41533-022-00296-6.
6
Psychometric properties and predictive validity of the PP-ACT.PP-ACT的心理测量特性及预测效度。
J Asthma. 2023 Jan;60(1):174-184. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2036755. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
7
Implementing asthma management guidelines in public primary care clinics in Malaysia.在马来西亚的公立基层医疗诊所中实施哮喘管理指南。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2021 Nov 29;31(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41533-021-00257-5.
8
Harmonizing allergy care-integrated care pathways and multidisciplinary approaches.协调过敏护理——整合护理路径与多学科方法。
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Sep 25;14(10):100584. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100584. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Patient perspectives of the influence of severe and non-severe asthma on their quality of life: A national survey of asthma patients in Spain.西班牙全国哮喘患者调查:严重和非严重哮喘对患者生活质量影响的患者观点。
Clin Respir J. 2022 Feb;16(2):130-141. doi: 10.1111/crj.13461. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
10
Mixed methods process evaluation of my breathing matters, a digital intervention to support self-management of asthma.混合方法过程评价我的呼吸问题,一个支持哮喘自我管理的数字干预措施。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2021 Jun 4;31(1):35. doi: 10.1038/s41533-021-00248-6.
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 Jun 12;24:14009. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.9.
4
Prevalence of asthma control among adults in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK.法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和英国成年人哮喘控制的流行情况。
Eur Respir Rev. 2009 Jun;18(112):105-12. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00001209.
5
Trends in the epidemiology of asthma in England: a national study of 333,294 patients.英格兰哮喘流行病学趋势:一项针对 333294 名患者的全国性研究。
J R Soc Med. 2010 Mar;103(3):98-106. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090348.
6
Internet-based self-management plus education compared with usual care in asthma: a randomized trial.基于互联网的自我管理加教育与哮喘常规护理的比较:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jul 21;151(2):110-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-2-200907210-00008.
7
Validation of the asthma impact survey, a brief asthma-specific quality of life tool.哮喘影响调查问卷的验证,一种简短的特定于哮喘的生活质量工具。
Qual Life Res. 2007 Mar;16(2):345-55. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-9103-2. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
8
Asthma Control Test: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients not previously followed by asthma specialists.哮喘控制测试:在既往未接受哮喘专科医生随访的患者中的可靠性、有效性及反应性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Mar;117(3):549-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.01.011.