Taggart A J, Hill J, Astbury C, Dixon J S, Bird H A, Wright V
Br J Rheumatol. 1987 Feb;26(1):32-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/26.1.32.
Thirty patients (22 women) with active rheumatoid arthritis participated in an open study of 6 months' treatment with either enteric-coated sulphasalazine (SASP) or SASP plus D-penicillamine (DPA). Patients were assessed at regular intervals using a number of clinical and biochemical tests designed to detect specific antirheumatic activity. There were significant improvements in clinical and laboratory variables with both regimens consistent with second-line activity. Improvements were greater and more numerous with combination therapy. At the end of the trial period, there were nine 'responders' in the SASP/DPA group but only six in the SASP group. Neither efficacy nor toxicity could be related to patient acetylator status. Nausea and dyspepsia were frequent problems with both treatment regimens but dysgeusia and thrombocytopenia were confined to the SASP/DPA group. Study withdrawals were twice as common with combination therapy. These results suggest that a combination of SASP and DPA is more potent than SASP alone but at the expense of poorer patient tolerance.
30例活动性类风湿关节炎患者(22例女性)参与了一项为期6个月的开放研究,接受肠溶柳氮磺胺吡啶(SASP)或SASP加D - 青霉胺(DPA)治疗。定期使用一系列旨在检测特定抗风湿活性的临床和生化检查对患者进行评估。两种治疗方案在临床和实验室指标上均有显著改善,符合二线治疗活性。联合治疗的改善更大且更多。试验期结束时,SASP / DPA组有9例“反应者”,而SASP组仅有6例。疗效和毒性均与患者乙酰化状态无关。恶心和消化不良在两种治疗方案中都是常见问题,但味觉障碍和血小板减少症仅限于SASP / DPA组。联合治疗导致的研究退出率是单独使用SASP的两倍。这些结果表明,SASP与DPA联合使用比单独使用SASP更有效,但代价是患者耐受性较差。