Berman Sara E, Koscik Rebecca L, Clark Lindsay R, Mueller Kimberly D, Bluder Lisa, Galvin James E, Johnson Sterling C
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Medical Scientist and Neuroscience Training Programs, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2017;1(1):9-13. doi: 10.3233/ADR-170004. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
The Quick Dementia Rating System (QDRS) and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) assess global cognitive and functional decline. We evaluated whether the shorter QDRS was a valid screen for problems identified by the CDR in individuals with minimal clinical abnormalities. Agreement between QDRS-Global and CDR-Global was assessed for 54 participants from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention. Resource-savings achieved by adopting an "administer CDR-only-if-QDRS-Global>0" approach were estimated based on 238 subsequent participants. Agreement statistics (concordance = 88.9%) supported use of the QDRS as an initial informant report and modifying center protocol to administer CDRs only when QDRS>0 reduced CDR assessments by 79.8%.
快速痴呆评定系统(QDRS)和临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)用于评估整体认知和功能衰退情况。我们评估了较短的QDRS对于临床异常极小的个体中由CDR所识别问题的筛查是否有效。对来自威斯康星州阿尔茨海默病预防登记处的54名参与者评估了QDRS-整体评分与CDR-整体评分之间的一致性。基于随后的238名参与者,估计了采用“仅当QDRS-整体评分>0时才进行CDR评定”方法所节省的资源。一致性统计(一致性 = 88.9%)支持将QDRS用作初始信息提供者报告,并且修改中心方案以便仅在QDRS>0时才进行CDR评定,这使CDR评估减少了79.8%。