Finch Laura E, Tomiyama A Janet, Ward Andrew
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19081, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 21;14(8):939. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080939.
Time spent sitting is associated with negative health outcomes, motivating some individuals to adopt standing desk workstations. This study represents the first investigation of the effects of standing desk use on reading comprehension and creativity. In a counterbalanced, within-subjects design, 96 participants completed reading comprehension and creativity tasks while both sitting and standing. Participants self-reported their mood during the tasks and also responded to measures of expended effort and task difficulty. In addition, participants indicated whether they expected that they would perform better on work-relevant tasks while sitting or standing. Despite participants' beliefs that they would perform worse on most tasks while standing, body position did not affect reading comprehension or creativity performance, nor did it affect perceptions of effort or difficulty. Mood was also unaffected by position, with a few exceptions: Participants exhibited greater task engagement (i.e., interest, enthusiasm, and alertness) and less comfort while standing rather than sitting. In sum, performance and psychological experience as related to task completion were nearly entirely uninfluenced by acute (~30-min) standing desk use.
久坐与不良健康后果相关,这促使一些人采用站立式办公桌。本研究首次调查了使用站立式办公桌对阅读理解和创造力的影响。在一项平衡的、受试者内设计中,96名参与者在坐着和站着的状态下分别完成了阅读理解和创造力任务。参与者在任务过程中自我报告了他们的情绪,还对付出的努力程度和任务难度进行了评估。此外,参与者指出他们认为自己在坐着或站着时在与工作相关的任务上表现会更好。尽管参与者认为他们在站立时在大多数任务上表现会更差,但身体姿势并未影响阅读理解或创造力表现,也未影响对努力程度或难度的感知。情绪也不受姿势影响,只有少数例外:与坐着相比,参与者站立时表现出更高的任务投入度(即兴趣、热情和警觉性),但舒适度较低。总之,与任务完成相关的表现和心理体验几乎完全不受急性(约30分钟)使用站立式办公桌的影响。