Suppr超能文献

治疗物质使用障碍的疗效评估是否反映了患者的个人关注点?欧洲推荐的评估方法的范围综述。

Does outcome measurement of treatment for substance use disorder reflect the personal concerns of patients? A scoping review of measures recommended in Europe.

机构信息

University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Oct 1;179:299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.049. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

Abstract

There are a growing number of authors stating that outcome measurement in treatment for substance use disorders should go beyond substance use and include other bio-psycho-social variables of interest. However, little is known about which topics tend to be covered by outcome measures and whether they reflect the typical concerns of this patient group. This study followed a scoping review methodology in which 42 outcome measures recommended by an EU agency for substance use disorders were reviewed. We identified the domains of problems covered by these 42 measures and then compared them with 54 domains derived from patients, in a previous study. We also explored how similar the existing measures were in terms of domains covered, and which patient derived domains tended to be represented in those measures. We identified 31domains of problems across the 42 measures, with 'substance use' and 'psychological health' among the commonest. Most measures were similar in content to each other and multidimensional. Almost all domains of problems identified in the outcome measures corresponded to concerns reported by patients. On the other hand, we found that several topics of relevance for patients were not covered by any of the measure included in our study. This suggests that existing outcome measurement does not always target aspects that affect patients' lives, as reported directly by patients. Our study shows that outcome measurement needs to adopt a more flexible and comprehensive approach, by taking on board the problems experienced by patients in this population.

摘要

越来越多的作者指出,物质使用障碍治疗的疗效评估不应仅局限于物质使用,还应包括其他生物心理社会相关变量。然而,目前对于哪些主题倾向于被疗效评估所涵盖,以及它们是否反映了该患者群体的典型关注点,我们知之甚少。本研究采用了范围综述方法,对欧盟机构推荐的 42 种物质使用障碍疗效评估工具进行了回顾。我们确定了这些 42 种评估工具所涵盖的问题领域,然后将它们与之前一项研究中患者提出的 54 个领域进行了比较。我们还探讨了现有评估工具在涵盖的领域方面的相似性,以及哪些患者提出的领域倾向于在这些评估工具中得到体现。我们在 42 种评估工具中确定了 31 个问题领域,其中“物质使用”和“心理健康”是最常见的。大多数评估工具在内容上彼此相似,且多维。在疗效评估工具中确定的几乎所有问题领域都与患者报告的问题相对应。另一方面,我们发现,患者报告的一些与治疗相关的重要问题并没有被我们研究中包含的任何评估工具所涵盖。这表明,现有的疗效评估并不总是针对那些直接影响患者生活的方面,而这些方面是由患者自己报告的。本研究表明,疗效评估需要采取更灵活和全面的方法,考虑到该人群中患者所经历的问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验