Vignoli Michela, Nielsen Karina, Guglielmi Dina, Tabanelli Maria C, Violante Francesco S
Department of Education Studies, University of BolognaBologna, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale per la Valutazione del Sistema Educativo di Istruzione e di FormazioneRome, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 9;8:1347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01347. eCollection 2017.
In occupational health interventions, there is a debate as to whether standardized or tailored measures should be used to identify which aspects of the psychosocial work environment should be targeted in order to improve employees' well-being. Using the Job Demands-Resources model, the main aim of the present study is to demonstrate how a mixed methods approach to conducting screening enables the identification of potential context-dependent demands and resources in the workplace, which should to be targeted by the intervention. Specifically, we used a mixed methods exploratory sequential research design. First, we conducted four focus groups ( = 37) in a sample of employees working in grocery stores in Italy. The qualitative results allowed to identify one possible context-specific job demand: the use of a work scheduling IT software, whose implementation resulted in a high rotation between different market's departments. From the qualitative results, this context-specific demand seemed to be related to workers' well-being. Thus, in a subsequent questionnaire survey ( = 288), we included this demand together with generic measures of social support and psychological well-being. Results confirmed that this context-specific job demand was related to emotional exhaustion. Furthermore, it was found that social support moderated the relationship between this specific job demand and emotional exhaustion showing among employees whose activities depended on the IT software, employees that perceived higher levels of social support from colleagues experienced lower levels of emotional exhaustion with respect to their colleagues who perceived lower levels of social support. The present study confirms that mixed methods approach is useful in occupational health intervention research and offers a way forward on helping organizations prioritize their intervention activities.
在职业健康干预措施中,对于应采用标准化措施还是量身定制的措施来确定心理社会工作环境的哪些方面应作为目标,以改善员工的幸福感,存在着争论。运用工作要求-资源模型,本研究的主要目的是展示一种采用混合方法进行筛查的方式,如何能够识别工作场所中潜在的因情境而异的要求和资源,而这些应成为干预措施的目标。具体而言,我们采用了一种混合方法探索性序列研究设计。首先,我们在意大利杂货店工作的员工样本中进行了四个焦点小组访谈(n = 37)。定性研究结果使我们能够识别出一种可能因具体情境而异的工作要求:使用一种工作排班信息技术软件,该软件的实施导致员工在不同市场部门之间频繁轮岗。从定性研究结果来看,这种因具体情境而异的要求似乎与员工的幸福感有关。因此,在随后的问卷调查(n = 288)中,我们将这一要求与社会支持和心理健康的一般测量指标一同纳入。结果证实,这种因具体情境而异的工作要求与情感耗竭有关。此外,研究发现社会支持调节了这种具体工作要求与情感耗竭之间的关系,即在那些工作活动依赖于该信息技术软件的员工中,相比那些感知到同事社会支持水平较低的员工,感知到同事较高社会支持水平的员工情感耗竭程度更低。本研究证实,混合方法在职业健康干预研究中是有用的,并为帮助组织确定干预活动的优先顺序提供了一条前进的道路。