Robbie Hasti, Daccord Cécile, Chua Felix, Devaraj Anand
Radiology Dept, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Interstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Eur Respir Rev. 2017 Sep 6;26(145). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0051-2017. Print 2017 Sep 30.
Accurate assessment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) disease severity is integral to the care provided to patients with IPF. However, to date, there are no generally accepted or validated staging systems. There is an abundance of data on using information acquired from physiological, radiological and pathological parameters, in isolation or in combination, to assess disease severity in IPF. Recently, there has been interest in using serum biomarkers and computed tomography-derived quantitative lung fibrosis measures to stage disease severity in IPF. This review will focus on the suggested methods for staging IPF, at baseline and on serial assessment, their strengths and limitations, as well as future developments.
准确评估特发性肺纤维化(IPF)疾病的严重程度对于为IPF患者提供的护理至关重要。然而,迄今为止,尚无普遍接受或经过验证的分期系统。有大量关于单独或联合使用从生理、放射和病理参数获取的信息来评估IPF疾病严重程度的数据。最近,人们对使用血清生物标志物和计算机断层扫描衍生的定量肺纤维化测量方法来对IPF疾病严重程度进行分期产生了兴趣。本综述将重点关注IPF基线和连续评估时建议的分期方法、它们的优势和局限性以及未来的发展。