Laokri Samia
School of Public Health, Health Policy and Systems - International Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Aug 25;4:130. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00130. eCollection 2017.
There is a massive global momentum to progress toward the sustainable development and universal health coverage goals. However, effective policies to health-care coverage can only emerge through high-quality services delivered to empowered care users by means of strong local health systems and a translational standpoint. Health policies aimed at removing user fees for a defined health-care package may fail at reaching desired results if not applied with system thinking.
Secondary data analysis of two country-based cost-of-illness studies was performed to gain knowledge in informed decision-making toward enhanced access to care in the context of resource-constraint settings. A scoping review was performed to map relevant experiences and evidence underpinning the defined research area, the economic burden of illness.
Original studies reflected on catastrophic costs to patients because of care services use and related policy gaps. Poverty diseases such as tuberculosis (TB) may constitute prime examples to assess the extent of effective high-priority health-care coverage. Our findings suggest that a share of the economic burden of illness can be attributed to implementation failures of health programs and supply-side features, which may highly impair attainment of the global stated goals. We attempted to define and discuss a knowledge development framework for effective policy-making and foster system levers for integrated care.
Bottlenecks to effective policy persist and rely on interrelated patterns of health-care coverage. Health system performance and policy responsiveness have to do with collaborative work among all health stakeholders. Public-private mix strategies may play a role in lowering the economic burden of disease and solving some policy gaps. We reviewed possible added value and pitfalls of collaborative approaches to enhance dynamic local knowledge development and realize integration with the various health-care silos.
Despite a large political commitment and mobilization efforts from funding, the global development goal of financial protection for health-newly adopted in TB control as no TB-affected household experiencing catastrophic expenditure-may remain aspirational. To enhance effective access to care for all, innovative opportunities in patient-centered and collaborative practices must be taken. Further research is greatly needed to optimize the use of locally relevant knowledge, networks, and technologies.
全球正朝着可持续发展和全民健康覆盖目标迈进,势头强劲。然而,只有通过强大的地方卫生系统以转化的视角为有能力的医疗服务使用者提供高质量服务,才能制定出有效的医疗覆盖政策。如果不以系统思维应用旨在取消特定医疗服务包使用者费用的卫生政策,可能无法取得预期效果。
对两项基于国家的疾病成本研究进行二次数据分析,以获取在资源受限背景下增强医疗服务可及性的明智决策所需知识。进行了一项范围审查,以梳理支撑既定研究领域即疾病经济负担的相关经验和证据。
原始研究反映了因使用医疗服务给患者带来的灾难性成本以及相关政策差距。结核病等贫困疾病可能是评估有效高优先级医疗覆盖范围的主要例子。我们的研究结果表明,疾病经济负担的一部分可归因于卫生项目的实施失败和供应方特征,这可能严重损害全球既定目标的实现。我们试图定义并讨论有效决策的知识发展框架,并促进综合医疗的系统杠杆作用。
有效政策的瓶颈依然存在,且依赖于相互关联的医疗覆盖模式。卫生系统绩效和政策响应能力与所有卫生利益相关者之间的协作工作有关。公私混合策略可能在降低疾病经济负担和解决一些政策差距方面发挥作用。我们审视了协作方法在增强地方动态知识发展及实现与各医疗孤岛整合方面可能带来的附加值和陷阱。
尽管在资金方面有巨大的政治承诺和动员努力,但结核病控制中新采用的卫生财务保护全球发展目标——即没有受结核病影响的家庭经历灾难性支出——可能仍只是理想目标。为增强所有人获得有效医疗服务的机会,必须把握以患者为中心和协作实践中的创新机遇。迫切需要进一步研究,以优化对地方相关知识、网络和技术的利用。