Suppr超能文献

一种新型非唑类局部治疗可减少马拉色菌数量及相关皮炎:一项针对自然感染犬的短期前瞻性、随机、双盲和安慰剂对照试验。

A novel non-azole topical treatment reduces Malassezia numbers and associated dermatitis: a short term prospective, randomized, blinded and placebo-controlled trial in naturally infected dogs.

作者信息

Sjöström Ylva, Mellor Paul, Bergvall Kerstin

机构信息

Blue Star Animal Hospital, Gjutjärnsgatan 4, Gothenburg, 417 07, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7054, Uppsala, 750 07, Sweden.

出版信息

Vet Dermatol. 2018 Feb;29(1):14-e7. doi: 10.1111/vde.12488. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malassezia yeast overgrowth on the skin is a common and often recurrent cause of dermatitis in dogs; it can be an exacerbating factor of atopic dermatitis. Anti-fungal drugs have been a standard treatment, but there is some concern that resistance may be evolving in a spectrum of Malassezia species. Safe, efficient and easy-to-use alternatives are needed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess if a commercially available topical non-azole solution applied to paws affected by Malassezia-associated dermatitis (MAD), could ameliorate Malassezia numbers and associated signs over a short term (14 day) trial.

ANIMALS

Eighteen dogs with MAD affecting at least two paws.

METHODS

The study design was prospective, randomized, blinded and placebo-controlled, using a split-body protocol. Dogs were treated once daily with the test solution on one paw and placebo on the other. Dogs were examined at days 0 and 14 ± 3. The primary end-point was Malassezia numbers assessed cytologically. Secondary end-points were clinical scores for lesion severity and pruritus as assessed by a pruritus Visual Analog Scale (PVAS). Owner compliance and adverse effects were assessed.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant reduction in Malassezia numbers and clinical scores for paws treated with the test solution versus placebo. No statistical difference in PVAS was found.

CONCLUSION

Daily topical application of the test solution was effective in reducing the Malassezia burden, as well as improving clinical scores in dogs with MAD of the paws. No adverse effects were reported and owners described the product as either "easy" or "very easy" to use.

摘要

背景

皮肤马拉色菌酵母过度生长是犬类皮炎常见且常复发的病因;它可能是特应性皮炎的一个加重因素。抗真菌药物一直是标准治疗方法,但有人担心马拉色菌属的一系列菌种可能正在产生耐药性。因此需要安全、有效且易于使用的替代方法。

目的

评估一种市售的非唑类外用溶液应用于受马拉色菌相关性皮炎(MAD)影响的爪子,在短期(14天)试验中是否能减少马拉色菌数量并改善相关症状。

动物

18只患有MAD且至少两只爪子受影响的犬。

方法

研究设计为前瞻性、随机、双盲和安慰剂对照,采用分体方案。犬每天在一只爪子上涂抹测试溶液,另一只爪子涂抹安慰剂。在第0天和第14±3天对犬进行检查。主要终点是通过细胞学评估的马拉色菌数量。次要终点是通过瘙痒视觉模拟量表(PVAS)评估的病变严重程度和瘙痒的临床评分。评估主人的依从性和不良反应。

结果

与安慰剂相比,用测试溶液治疗的爪子的马拉色菌数量和临床评分有统计学意义的降低。PVAS未发现统计学差异。

结论

每天局部应用测试溶液可有效减轻患MAD的犬爪子的马拉色菌负担,并改善临床评分。未报告不良反应,主人将该产品描述为“容易”或“非常容易”使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验