Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, PO Box, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland.
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Sep 19;10(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2364-5.
Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus are two highly invasive mosquito species, both vectors of several viruses, including dengue, chikungunya and Zika. While Ae. aegypti is the primary vector in the tropics and sub-tropics, Ae. albopictus is increasingly under the public health watch as it has been implicated in arbovirus-transmission in more temperate regions, including continental Europe. Vector control using insecticides is the pillar of most control programmes; hence development of insecticide resistance is of great concern. As part of a Brazilian-Swiss Joint Research Programme we set out to assess whether there are any signs of existing or incipient insecticide resistance primarily against the larvicide Bacillus thuringiensis svar. israelensis (Bti), but also against currently applied and potentially alternative insecticides in our areas, Recife (Brazil) and the Swiss-Italian border region.
Following World Health Organization guidelines, dose-response curves for a range of insecticides were established for both colonized and field caught Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. The larvicides included Bti, two of its toxins, Cry11Aa and Cry4Ba, Lysinibacillus sphaericus, Vectomax CG®, a formulated combination of Bti and L. sphaericus, and diflubenzuron. In addition to the larvicides, the Swiss-Italian Ae. albopictus populations were also tested against five adulticides (bendiocarb, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, malathion, permethrin and λ-cyhalothrin).
Showing a similar dose-response, all mosquito populations were fully susceptible to the larvicides tested and, in particular, to Bti which is currently used both in Brazil and Switzerland. In addition, there were no signs of incipient resistance against Bti as larvae were equally susceptible to the individual toxins, Cry11Aa and Cry4Ba. The field-caught Swiss-Italian populations were susceptible to the adulticides tested but DDT mortality rates showed signs of reduced susceptibility.
The insecticides currently used for mosquito control in Switzerland and Brazil are still effective against the target populations. The present study provides an important reference as relatively few insecticide susceptibility surveys have been carried out with Ae. albopictus.
埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊是两种高度入侵性的蚊子,都是几种病毒的传播媒介,包括登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡病毒。虽然埃及伊蚊是热带和亚热带地区的主要传播媒介,但由于其已被牵连到包括欧洲大陆在内的更温和地区的虫媒病毒传播中,因此越来越受到公共卫生的关注。使用杀虫剂进行病媒控制是大多数控制计划的支柱;因此,杀虫剂耐药性的发展是一个非常关注的问题。作为巴西-瑞士联合研究计划的一部分,我们着手评估是否存在任何现有或初期的杀虫剂耐药迹象,主要是针对幼虫期杀虫剂苏云金芽孢杆菌以色列亚种(Bti),但也针对我们所在地区(巴西累西腓和瑞士-意大利边境地区)目前应用和潜在替代的杀虫剂。
根据世界卫生组织的指导方针,为已驯化和野外捕获的埃及伊蚊和白纹伊蚊建立了一系列杀虫剂的剂量反应曲线。幼虫期杀虫剂包括 Bti、其两种毒素 Cry11Aa 和 Cry4Ba、球形芽孢杆菌、Vectomax CG®(Bti 和 L. sphaericus 的配方组合)和除虫脲。除了幼虫期杀虫剂外,瑞士-意大利白纹伊蚊种群还针对五种成虫期杀虫剂(苯氧威、滴滴涕、马拉硫磷、氯菊酯和λ-氯氟氰菊酯)进行了测试。
所有蚊子种群对测试的幼虫期杀虫剂表现出相似的剂量反应,均完全敏感,特别是对目前在巴西和瑞士都使用的 Bti。此外,没有出现对 Bti 的初期耐药迹象,因为幼虫对Cry11Aa 和 Cry4Ba 两种毒素同样敏感。野外捕获的瑞士-意大利种群对测试的成虫期杀虫剂敏感,但滴滴涕死亡率显示出耐药性降低的迹象。
瑞士和巴西目前用于蚊子控制的杀虫剂仍然对目标种群有效。本研究提供了一个重要的参考,因为相对较少对白纹伊蚊进行了杀虫剂敏感性调查。