• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Vt Selection in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征五十年研究。急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的通气设置选择
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec 15;196(12):1519-1525. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1629CI.
2
Feasibility and safety of low-flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to facilitate ultra-protective ventilation in patients with moderate acute respiratory distress sindrome.低流量体外二氧化碳清除促进中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者超保护性通气的可行性和安全性。
Crit Care. 2016 Feb 10;20:36. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1211-y.
3
Ventilator-induced lung injury during controlled ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: less is probably better.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者控制性通气时呼吸机所致肺损伤:少即是多。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2018 May;12(5):403-414. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2018.1457954. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
4
Feasibility and safety of low-flow extracorporeal CO removal managed with a renal replacement platform to enhance lung-protective ventilation of patients with mild-to-moderate ARDS.应用肾脏替代平台管理低流量体外 CO 去除对轻中度 ARDS 患者实施肺保护性通气的可行性和安全性。
Crit Care. 2018 May 10;22(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2038-5.
5
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.急性呼吸窘迫综合征:诊断与治疗的进展。
JAMA. 2018 Feb 20;319(7):698-710. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21907.
6
The future of mechanical ventilation: lessons from the present and the past.机械通气的未来:从现在和过去中吸取的教训。
Crit Care. 2017 Jul 12;21(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1750-x.
7
Feasibility and safety of ultra-low tidal volume ventilation without extracorporeal circulation in moderately severe and severe ARDS patients.中重度 ARDS 患者在不使用体外循环的情况下进行超低潮气量通气的可行性和安全性。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Nov;45(11):1590-1598. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05776-x. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
8
How to ventilate patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome?如何对非急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者进行通气?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Feb;21(1):65-73. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000165.
9
Should we use driving pressure to set tidal volume?我们是否应该使用驱动压来设置潮气量?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Feb;23(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000377.
10
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP Strategies for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高呼气末正压(PEEP)与低呼气末正压策略治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S297-S303. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-338OT.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Pathophysiological Insights, Subphenotypes, and Clinical Implications-A Comprehensive Review.急性呼吸窘迫综合征:病理生理学见解、亚表型及临床意义——一篇综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 22;14(15):5184. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155184.
2
A bibliometric analysis of respiratory mechanics research related to acute respiratory distress syndrome from 1985 to 2023.1985年至2023年与急性呼吸窘迫综合征相关的呼吸力学研究的文献计量分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 20;11:1420875. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1420875. eCollection 2024.
3
An Update on Management of Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征管理的最新进展:美国胸科学会临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;209(1):24-36. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2011ST.
4
Acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19 vs. Non-COVID-19: clinical characteristics and outcomes in a tertiary care setting in Mexico City.COVID-19 与非 COVID-19 患者的急性呼吸窘迫综合征:墨西哥城一家三级护理中心的临床特征和结局。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Nov 6;23(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02744-6.
5
Electric impedance tomography-guided PEEP titration reduces mechanical power in ARDS: a randomized crossover pilot trial.电阻抗断层成像指导的 PEEP 滴定降低 ARDS 中的机械功率:一项随机交叉先导试验。
Crit Care. 2023 Jan 17;27(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04315-x.
6
Analysis of predictors of mortality and clinical outcomes of different subphenotypes for moderate-to-severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective single-center study.中重度小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征不同亚表型的死亡率及临床结局预测因素分析:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 1;10:1019314. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1019314. eCollection 2022.
7
Interpretation and use of intraoperative protective ventilation parameters: a scoping review.术中保护性通气参数的解读和应用:范围综述。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(4):320-333. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.120673.
8
Influences of assisted breathing and mechanical ventilator settings on tidal volume and alveolar pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a bench study.辅助呼吸和机械通气设置对急性呼吸窘迫综合征潮气量和肺泡压的影响:一项基础研究。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2021 Oct-Dec;33(4):572-582. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20210084. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
9
Association of different positive end-expiratory pressure selection strategies with all-cause mortality in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.不同呼气末正压选择策略与成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者全因死亡率的关联。
Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 12;10(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01766-7.
10
ECCOR in 12 COVID-19 ARDS Patients With Extremely Low Compliance and Refractory Hypercapnia.12例极低顺应性和难治性高碳酸血症的COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的体外二氧化碳清除(ECCOR)治疗
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 8;8:654658. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.654658. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Driving pressure: a marker of severity, a safety limit, or a goal for mechanical ventilation?驱动压力:严重程度的标志物、安全极限还是机械通气的目标?
Crit Care. 2017 Aug 4;21(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1779-x.
2
Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Setting Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征50年研究。急性呼吸窘迫综合征中呼气末正压的设置。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun 1;195(11):1429-1438. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201610-2035CI.
3
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症与脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016版
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255.
4
Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Spontaneous Breathing during Mechanical Ventilation. Risks, Mechanisms, and Management.ARDS 五十载研究。机械通气时自主呼吸。风险、机制与管理。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 15;195(8):985-992. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0748CP.
5
Potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome from acute respiratory distress syndrome: the LUNG SAFE study.可能影响急性呼吸窘迫综合征预后的可调节因素:LUNG SAFE 研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1865-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4571-5. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
6
Transpulmonary Pressure: The Importance of Precise Definitions and Limiting Assumptions.跨肺压:精准定义和限制假设的重要性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec 15;194(12):1452-1457. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201512-2448CP.
7
End-inspiratory pause prolongation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: effects on gas exchange and mechanics.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者吸气末暂停延长:对气体交换和力学的影响。
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0183-z. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
8
Electrical impedance tomography in adult patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: A systematic review.接受机械通气的成年患者的电阻抗断层扫描:一项系统评价。
J Crit Care. 2016 Oct;35:33-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.04.028. Epub 2016 May 3.
9
Ultra-protective ventilation and hypoxemia.超保护性通气与低氧血症
Crit Care. 2016 May 12;20(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1310-9.
10
Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries.全球 50 个国家重症监护病房急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的流行病学、治疗模式和死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.

急性呼吸窘迫综合征五十年研究。急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的通气设置选择

Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Vt Selection in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

作者信息

Sahetya Sarina K, Mancebo Jordi, Brower Roy G

机构信息

1 Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.

2 Department of Medicine, University of Montréal, Division of Intensive Care at Centre Hospitalier Université de Montréal (CHUM) and Centre Recherche CHUM, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec 15;196(12):1519-1525. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1629CI.

DOI:10.1164/rccm.201708-1629CI
PMID:28930639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5754449/
Abstract

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is critical in the management of many patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, MV can also cause ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The selection of an appropriate Vt is an essential part of a lung-protective MV strategy. Since the publication of a large randomized clinical trial demonstrating the benefit of lower Vts, the use of Vts of 6 ml/kg predicted body weight (based on sex and height) has been recommended in clinical practice guidelines. However, the predicted body weight approach is imperfect in patients with ARDS because the amount of aerated lung varies considerably due to differences in inflammation, consolidation, flooding, and atelectasis. Better approaches to setting Vt may include limits on end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure, lung strain, and driving pressure. The limits of lowering Vt have not yet been established, and some patients may benefit from Vts that are lower than those in current use. However, lowering Vts may result in respiratory acidosis. Tactics to reduce respiratory acidosis include reductions in ventilation circuit dead space, increases in respiratory rate, higher positive end-expiratory pressures in patients who recruit lung in response to positive end-expiratory pressure, recruitment maneuvers, and prone positioning. Mechanical adjuncts such as extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal may be useful to normalize pH and carbon dioxide levels, but further studies will be necessary to demonstrate benefit with this technology.

摘要

机械通气(MV)在许多急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的治疗中至关重要。然而,MV也可导致呼吸机诱导的肺损伤(VILI)。选择合适的潮气量(Vt)是肺保护性MV策略的重要组成部分。自从一项大型随机临床试验证明较低Vt的益处发表以来,临床实践指南推荐使用基于预测体重(根据性别和身高)的6 ml/kg的Vt。然而,预测体重方法在ARDS患者中并不完美,因为由于炎症、实变、肺水肿和肺不张的差异,充气肺的量差异很大。设置Vt的更好方法可能包括限制吸气末跨肺压、肺应变和驱动压。降低Vt的限度尚未确定,一些患者可能受益于低于目前使用的Vt。然而,降低Vt可能导致呼吸性酸中毒。减少呼吸性酸中毒的策略包括减少通气回路死腔、增加呼吸频率、对呼气末正压有肺复张反应的患者增加呼气末正压、肺复张手法和俯卧位。诸如体外二氧化碳清除等机械辅助手段可能有助于使pH值和二氧化碳水平正常化,但需要进一步研究来证明该技术的益处。