Sahetya Sarina K, Mancebo Jordi, Brower Roy G
1 Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
2 Department of Medicine, University of Montréal, Division of Intensive Care at Centre Hospitalier Université de Montréal (CHUM) and Centre Recherche CHUM, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec 15;196(12):1519-1525. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1629CI.
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is critical in the management of many patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, MV can also cause ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The selection of an appropriate Vt is an essential part of a lung-protective MV strategy. Since the publication of a large randomized clinical trial demonstrating the benefit of lower Vts, the use of Vts of 6 ml/kg predicted body weight (based on sex and height) has been recommended in clinical practice guidelines. However, the predicted body weight approach is imperfect in patients with ARDS because the amount of aerated lung varies considerably due to differences in inflammation, consolidation, flooding, and atelectasis. Better approaches to setting Vt may include limits on end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure, lung strain, and driving pressure. The limits of lowering Vt have not yet been established, and some patients may benefit from Vts that are lower than those in current use. However, lowering Vts may result in respiratory acidosis. Tactics to reduce respiratory acidosis include reductions in ventilation circuit dead space, increases in respiratory rate, higher positive end-expiratory pressures in patients who recruit lung in response to positive end-expiratory pressure, recruitment maneuvers, and prone positioning. Mechanical adjuncts such as extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal may be useful to normalize pH and carbon dioxide levels, but further studies will be necessary to demonstrate benefit with this technology.
机械通气(MV)在许多急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的治疗中至关重要。然而,MV也可导致呼吸机诱导的肺损伤(VILI)。选择合适的潮气量(Vt)是肺保护性MV策略的重要组成部分。自从一项大型随机临床试验证明较低Vt的益处发表以来,临床实践指南推荐使用基于预测体重(根据性别和身高)的6 ml/kg的Vt。然而,预测体重方法在ARDS患者中并不完美,因为由于炎症、实变、肺水肿和肺不张的差异,充气肺的量差异很大。设置Vt的更好方法可能包括限制吸气末跨肺压、肺应变和驱动压。降低Vt的限度尚未确定,一些患者可能受益于低于目前使用的Vt。然而,降低Vt可能导致呼吸性酸中毒。减少呼吸性酸中毒的策略包括减少通气回路死腔、增加呼吸频率、对呼气末正压有肺复张反应的患者增加呼气末正压、肺复张手法和俯卧位。诸如体外二氧化碳清除等机械辅助手段可能有助于使pH值和二氧化碳水平正常化,但需要进一步研究来证明该技术的益处。