• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三个地区冠心病危险因素管理中的性别差异。

Sex differences in risk factor management of coronary heart disease across three regions.

作者信息

Zhao Min, Vaartjes Ilonca, Graham Ian, Grobbee Diederick, Spiering Wilko, Klipstein-Grobusch Kerstin, Woodward Mark, Peters Sanne Ae

机构信息

Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Heart. 2017 Oct;103(20):1587-1594. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311429. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311429
PMID:28931567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5739833/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether there are sex differences in risk factor management of patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD), and to assess demographic variations of any potential sex differences.

METHODS

Patients with CHD were recruited from Europe, Asia, and the Middle East between 2012-2013. Adherence to guideline-recommended treatment and lifestyle targets was assessed and summarised as a Cardiovascular Health Index Score (CHIS). Age-adjusted regression models were used to estimate odds ratios for women versus men in risk factor management.

RESULTS

10 112 patients (29% women) were included. Compared with men, women were less likely to achieve targets for total cholesterol (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.59), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.64), and glucose (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.87), or to be physically active (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.81) or non-obese (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.90). In contrast, women had better control of blood pressure (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.44) and were more likely to be a non-smoker (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.22) than men. Overall, women were less likely than men to achieve all treatment targets (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.93) or obtain an adequate CHIS (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.91), but no significant differences were found for all lifestyle targets (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.02). Sex disparities in reaching treatment targets were smaller in Europe than in Asia and the Middle East. Women in Asia were more likely than men to reach lifestyle targets, with opposing results in Europe and the Middle East.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factor management for the secondary prevention of CHD was generally worse in women than in men. The magnitude and direction of the sex differences varied by region.

摘要

目的

探讨确诊冠心病(CHD)患者在危险因素管理方面是否存在性别差异,并评估任何潜在性别差异的人口统计学变化。

方法

2012年至2013年期间,从欧洲、亚洲和中东地区招募冠心病患者。评估对指南推荐的治疗和生活方式目标的依从性,并汇总为心血管健康指数评分(CHIS)。使用年龄调整回归模型估计女性与男性在危险因素管理方面的比值比。

结果

纳入10112例患者(29%为女性)。与男性相比,女性更难实现总胆固醇(比值比0.50,95%置信区间0.43至0.59)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(比值比0.57,95%置信区间0.51至0.64)和血糖(比值比0.78,95%置信区间0.70至0.87)的目标,或达到身体活动(比值比0.74,95%置信区间0.68至0.81)或非肥胖(比值比0.82,95%置信区间0.74至0.90)的标准。相比之下,女性在血压控制方面更好(比值比1.31,95%置信区间1.20至1.44),且比男性更有可能不吸烟(比值比1.93,95%置信区间1.67至2.22)。总体而言,女性比男性更难实现所有治疗目标(比值比0.75,95%置信区间0.60至0.93)或获得足够的CHIS(比值比0.81,95%置信区间0.73至0.91),但在所有生活方式目标方面未发现显著差异(比值比0.93,95%置信区间0.84至1.02)。在欧洲,实现治疗目标方面的性别差异小于亚洲和中东地区。亚洲女性比男性更有可能实现生活方式目标,而在欧洲和中东地区则结果相反。

结论

冠心病二级预防的危险因素管理总体上女性比男性差。性别差异的程度和方向因地区而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/5739833/439ac9370a2a/heartjnl-2017-311429f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/5739833/2b1f6b4207db/heartjnl-2017-311429f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/5739833/5e45fe99c18f/heartjnl-2017-311429f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/5739833/248a9db4272f/heartjnl-2017-311429f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/5739833/439ac9370a2a/heartjnl-2017-311429f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/5739833/2b1f6b4207db/heartjnl-2017-311429f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/5739833/5e45fe99c18f/heartjnl-2017-311429f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/5739833/248a9db4272f/heartjnl-2017-311429f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd00/5739833/439ac9370a2a/heartjnl-2017-311429f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex differences in risk factor management of coronary heart disease across three regions.三个地区冠心病危险因素管理中的性别差异。
Heart. 2017 Oct;103(20):1587-1594. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311429. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
2
EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 European countries.欧洲动脉粥样硬化调查III:对来自22个欧洲国家的冠心病患者的生活方式、风险因素及心脏保护药物治疗使用情况的调查。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Apr;16(2):121-37. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283294b1d.
3
SURF - SUrvey of Risk Factor management: first report of an international audit.SURF-风险因素管理调查:国际审计的第一份报告。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jul;21(7):813-22. doi: 10.1177/2047487312467870. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
4
Determinants of coronary artery disease risk factor management across three world regions.三个世界区域冠状动脉疾病风险因素管理的决定因素。
Heart Asia. 2019 Mar 8;11(1):e011112. doi: 10.1136/heartasia-2018-011112. eCollection 2019.
5
Simplifying the audit of risk factor recording and control: A report from an international study in 11 countries.简化风险因素记录与控制的审核:一项在11个国家开展的国际研究报告
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jul;23(11):1202-10. doi: 10.1177/2047487316647827. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
6
Depression, anxiety, and risk factor control in patients after hospitalization for coronary heart disease: the EUROASPIRE III Study.冠心病住院患者出院后的抑郁、焦虑及危险因素控制:EUROASPIRE III 研究。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Apr;20(2):331-40. doi: 10.1177/2047487312441724. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
7
Educational level and risk profile and risk control in patients with coronary heart disease.冠心病患者的教育水平、风险状况及风险控制
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 May;23(8):881-90. doi: 10.1177/2047487315601078. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
8
Gender differences in the implementation of cardiovascular prevention measures after an acute coronary event.急性冠脉事件后心血管预防措施实施中的性别差异。
Heart. 2010 Nov;96(21):1744-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.196170.
9
Sex differences in cardiovascular risk, lifestyle, and psychological factors in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Fukuoka Diabetes Registry.2 型糖尿病患者心血管风险、生活方式和心理因素的性别差异:福冈糖尿病登记研究。
Biol Sex Differ. 2023 May 22;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13293-023-00517-8.
10
Does sex matter in the associations between classic risk factors and fatal coronary heart disease in populations from the Asia-Pacific region?在亚太地区人群中,经典危险因素与致命性冠心病之间的关联存在性别差异吗?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Nov;14(9):820-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.820.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-Based Risk Evaluation in Acute Coronary Events-A Study Conducted on an Eastern-European Population.急性冠脉事件中基于性别的风险评估——一项针对东欧人群的研究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 6;61(7):1227. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071227.
2
Associations of DNA Methylation Algorithms of Aging With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality Risk Among US Older Adults.美国老年人中衰老的DNA甲基化算法与心血管疾病及死亡风险的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e040374. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.040374. Epub 2025 May 2.
3
Diabetes, glycaemic traits and cardiovascular disease in females and males: Observational and Mendelian randomisation analyses in the UK Biobank.

本文引用的文献

1
Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1980 - 2015年全球、区域和国家249种死因的预期寿命、全死因死亡率和死因别死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1459-1544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1.
2
2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR).2016年欧洲临床实践心血管疾病预防指南:欧洲心脏病学会和其他学会关于临床实践心血管疾病预防的第六联合工作组(由10个学会的代表和特邀专家组成),由欧洲心血管预防与康复协会(EACPR)特别贡献制定。
Atherosclerosis. 2016 Sep;252:207-274. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.05.037.
女性和男性中的糖尿病、血糖特征与心血管疾病:英国生物银行中的观察性和孟德尔随机化分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27(7):3789-3799. doi: 10.1111/dom.16406. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
4
Exploring sex-based differences in patient outcomes: A secondary analysis of Heartwatch, an Irish cardiovascular secondary prevention programme.探索患者预后的性别差异:对爱尔兰心血管疾病二级预防项目Heartwatch的二次分析。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Feb 14;24:200376. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200376. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Lipid Lowering Therapy Utilization and Lipid Goal Attainment in Women.女性的降脂治疗应用情况及血脂目标达成情况
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025 Jan 28;27(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s11883-025-01275-1.
6
Demographic Predictors of Elevated LDL Cholesterol in Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.1型糖尿病患者低密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高的人口统计学预测因素:一项横断面研究。
Clin Diabetes. 2024 Oct 3;43(1):92-99. doi: 10.2337/cd24-0051. eCollection 2025 Winter.
7
Sex-specific mechanisms in vascular aging: exploring cellular and molecular pathways in the pathogenesis of age-related cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.血管衰老中的性别特异性机制:探索与年龄相关的心血管和脑血管疾病发病机制中的细胞和分子途径。
Geroscience. 2025 Feb;47(1):301-337. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01489-2. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
8
Trajectories and management of vascular risk following the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A population-based matched cohort study between 1987 and 2018 in England.血管风险在多发性硬化症诊断后的轨迹和管理:1987 年至 2018 年在英格兰进行的基于人群的匹配队列研究。
Mult Scler. 2024 Nov;30(13):1653-1663. doi: 10.1177/13524585241287388. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
9
Trends in avoidable mortality from cardiovascular diseases in the European Union, 1995-2020: a retrospective secondary data analysis.1995 - 2020年欧盟心血管疾病可避免死亡率趋势:一项回顾性二次数据分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Sep 27;47:101079. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101079. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Sex differences and trends in managing cardiovascular risk factors in primary care: a dynamic cohort study.初级保健中管理心血管危险因素的性别差异与趋势:一项动态队列研究。
BJGP Open. 2025 Apr 24;9(1). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0175. Print 2025 Apr.
3
Drivers of the Sex Disparity in Statin Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Cohort Study.冠心病患者他汀类药物治疗中性别差异的驱动因素:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2016 May 5;11(5):e0155228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155228. eCollection 2016.
4
Simplifying the audit of risk factor recording and control: A report from an international study in 11 countries.简化风险因素记录与控制的审核:一项在11个国家开展的国际研究报告
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jul;23(11):1202-10. doi: 10.1177/2047487316647827. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
An Update on Gender Disparities in Coronary Heart Disease Care.关于冠心病治疗中的性别差异的最新研究进展。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016 May;18(5):28. doi: 10.1007/s11883-016-0574-5.
6
Awareness, knowledge and healthy lifestyle behaviors related to coronary heart disease among women: An integrative review.女性中与冠心病相关的意识、知识和健康生活方式行为:一项综合综述。
Heart Lung. 2016 May-Jun;45(3):173-85. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
7
The gender gap in risk factor control: Effects of age and education on the control of cardiovascular risk factors in male and female coronary patients. The EUROASPIRE IV study by the European Society of Cardiology.危险因素控制方面的性别差异:年龄和教育程度对男性和女性冠心病患者心血管危险因素控制的影响。欧洲心脏病学会的EUROASPIRE IV研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 15;209:284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
8
EUROASPIRE IV: A European Society of Cardiology survey on the lifestyle, risk factor and therapeutic management of coronary patients from 24 European countries.欧洲动脉粥样硬化调查项目IV:欧洲心脏病学会对来自24个欧洲国家的冠心病患者的生活方式、危险因素及治疗管理情况的调查。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Apr;23(6):636-48. doi: 10.1177/2047487315569401. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
9
Gender disparities in evidence-based statin therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病患者基于证据的他汀类药物治疗中的性别差异。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 1;115(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.09.041. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
10
Gender differences in achieving optimal lipid goals in patients with coronary artery disease.冠心病患者实现理想血脂目标的性别差异。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 May 15;113(10):1611-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.02.018. Epub 2014 Mar 1.