Suppr超能文献

用于牙种植成功的骨增强方法疗效的系统分析。

Systematic analysis on the efficacy of bone enhancement methods used for success in dental implants.

作者信息

Elakkiya S, Ramesh A S, Prabhu K

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College, Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jul-Sep;17(3):219-225. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_19_17.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Bone grafting is beneficial in enhancing bones that are lost due to trauma or natural or pathologic process. Autogenous bone, allogenic bone, xenogeneic bone, bone substitutes, and alloplasts can also be used for this purpose. Bone quantity should be adequate for the placement of implants, which necessitate the use of bone grafts before implant placement.

OBJECTIVE

This review analyses the different bone graft materials that are used for grafting around implants and evaluate if these grafts yield successful implant osseointegration over a period of time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE-PubMed database was searched from September 2016 to 10 years previously. Several journals were hand searched and from cross-references. The primary outcome measure that was analyzed was the survival rate of dental implants in the grafted sites at 6 months-1 year, and the secondary outcomes were success rates of dental implants over a period of 3-5 years' follow-up.

RESULTS

The search yielded 213 articles. Ultimately, 31 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were selected. The analysis shows that autologous bone grafts can be preferred over allografts and xenografts for grafting implant sites, which showed less complication and high success rate.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available data in the current existing studies with a follow-up period of at least 3-5 years, it can be summarized that the autologous bone grafts can be preferred over allografts and xenografts for grafting implant sites since they are stable for at least 3-5 years.

摘要

未标注

骨移植有助于增强因创伤、自然或病理过程而流失的骨组织。自体骨、异体骨、异种骨、骨替代物和异体材料也可用于此目的。骨量应足以放置种植体,这就需要在种植体植入前使用骨移植材料。

目的

本综述分析了用于种植体周围移植的不同骨移植材料,并评估这些移植材料在一段时间内是否能使种植体成功实现骨整合。

材料与方法

检索了MEDLINE-PubMed数据库2016年9月至之前10年的文献。还手工检索了几本期刊并查阅了交叉参考文献。分析的主要结局指标是移植部位种植体在6个月至1年时的存活率,次要结局指标是在3至5年随访期内种植体的成功率。

结果

检索共获得213篇文章。最终,选择了31项符合纳入标准的研究。分析表明,在种植体部位移植时,自体骨移植可能比异体骨移植和异种骨移植更受青睐,其并发症更少且成功率更高。

结论

根据现有研究中至少3至5年随访期的可用数据,可以总结出,在种植体部位移植时,自体骨移植可能比异体骨移植和异种骨移植更受青睐,因为它们至少在3至5年内是稳定的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e112/5601489/04bdfebb46d8/JIPS-17-219-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验