Dowdle S Blake, Glass Natalie, Anthony Chris A, Hettrich Carolyn M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Sep 15;5(9):2325967117726044. doi: 10.1177/2325967117726044. eCollection 2017 Sep.
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) consists of question banks for health domains through computer adaptive testing (CAT).
For patients with glenohumeral arthritis, (1) there would be high correlation between traditional patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and the PROMIS upper extremity item bank (PROMIS UE) and PROMIS physical function CAT (PROMIS PF CAT), and (2) PROMIS PF CAT would not demonstrate ceiling effects.
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
Sixty-one patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis were included. Each patient completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) assessment form, Marx Shoulder Activity Scale, Short Form-36 physical function scale (SF-36 PF), EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder (WOOS) index, PROMIS PF CAT, and the PROMIS UE. Correlation was defined as high (>0.7), moderate (0.4-0.6), or weak (0.2-0.3). Significant floor and ceiling effects were present if more than 15% of individuals scored the lowest or highest possible total score on any PRO.
The PROMIS PF demonstrated excellent correlation with the SF-36 PF ( = 0.81, < .0001) and good correlation with the ASES ( = 0.62, < .0001), EQ-5D ( = 0.64, < .001), and WOOS index ( = 0.51, < .01). The PROMIS PF demonstrated low correlation with the Marx scale ( = 0.29, = .02). The PROMIS UE demonstrated good correlation with the ASES ( = 0.55, < .0001), SF-36 ( = 0.53, < .01), EQ-5D ( = 0.48, < .01), and WOOS ( = 0.34, <.01), and poor correlation with the Marx scale ( = 0.06, = .62). There were no ceiling or floor effects observed. The mean number of items administered by the PROMIS PRO was 4.
These data suggest that for a patient population with operative shoulder osteoarthritis, PROMIS UE and PROMIS PF CAT may be valid alternative PROs. Additionally, PROMIS PF CAT offers a decreased question burden with no ceiling effects.
患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)由通过计算机自适应测试(CAT)的健康领域题库组成。
对于肩肱关节关节炎患者,(1)传统患者报告结局(PRO)测量与PROMIS上肢题库(PROMIS UE)和PROMIS身体功能CAT(PROMIS PF CAT)之间存在高度相关性,且(2)PROMIS PF CAT不会出现天花板效应。
队列研究(诊断);证据等级,3级。
纳入61例肩肱关节骨关节炎患者。每位患者完成美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)评估表、马克思肩部活动量表、简明健康调查36项身体功能量表(SF-36 PF)、欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D)问卷、西安大略肩关节炎指数(WOOS)、PROMIS PF CAT和PROMIS UE。相关性定义为高度相关(>0.7)、中度相关(0.4 - 0.6)或低度相关(0.2 - 0.3)。如果超过15%的个体在任何PRO上获得最低或最高可能总分,则存在显著的地板效应和天花板效应。
PROMIS PF与SF-36 PF表现出极好的相关性(r = 0.81,P <.0001),与ASES表现出良好的相关性(r = 0.62,P <.0001)、EQ-5D(r = 0.64,P <.001)和WOOS指数(r = 0.51,P <.01)。PROMIS PF与马克思量表表现出低度相关性(r = 0.29,P =.02)。PROMIS UE与ASES表现出良好的相关性(r = 0.55,P <.0001)、SF-36(r = 0.53,P <.01)、EQ-5D(r = 0.48,P <.01)和WOOS(r = 0.34,P <.01),与马克思量表表现出较差的相关性(r = 0.06,P =.62)。未观察到天花板效应或地板效应。PROMIS PRO管理的项目平均数量为4个。
这些数据表明,对于接受手术治疗的肩关节炎患者群体,PROMIS UE和PROMIS PF CAT可能是有效的替代PRO。此外,PROMIS PF CAT减少了问题负担且无天花板效应。