Bleiweiss-Sande Rachel, Kranz Sarah, Bakun Peter, Tanskey Lindsay, Wright Catherine, Sacheck Jennifer
1 Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Food Nutr Bull. 2017 Dec;38(4):585-593. doi: 10.1177/0379572117733400. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
Although there are several valid and reliable dietary screeners to measure child intake patterns, there is a paucity of brief assessment tools targeting under- and overconsumed foods.
To compare the Fueling Learning through Exercise study (FLEX) dietary questionnaire, a screener designed to assess consumption patterns in third to fifth graders, to a validated dietary assessment tool.
The FLEX dietary questionnaire was developed to assess fruit, vegetable, snack, and beverage consumption and was compared to the Block Kids Food Screener (BKFS). Correlations were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.
The sample (n = 63) had mean age of 9.9 years (SD 0.7). Most participants were non-Hispanic white (70%) and eligible for free/reduced price lunch (57%). Correlations between food group categories were significant for all groups ( P < .05) except fruits ( r = 0.51) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) ( r = 0.21). We found moderate-to-strong correlations between reported vegetable, salty snack, sweet snack, total beverage, milk, and fruit juice consumption (0.62, 0.59, 0.69, 0.47, 0.48, and 0.46, respectively). The FLEX screener reported systematically higher mean servings per day (0.24-1.1) compared to the BKFS (0.05-0.51).
Based on these correlations, the FLEX dietary questionnaire performs similarly to a validated tool in assessing intake of under- and overconsumed food groups in a diverse third to fifth grade population. Overall serving size discrepancies are likely due to more relevant food items on the FLEX questionnaire and a more child-friendly format. This study highlights the need to update older diet screeners to reflect current child consumption patterns.
尽管有几种有效且可靠的饮食筛查工具可用于测量儿童的饮食摄入模式,但针对摄入不足和过量食物的简短评估工具却很匮乏。
将旨在评估三至五年级学生饮食消费模式的“通过运动促进学习”(FLEX)饮食问卷与经过验证的饮食评估工具进行比较。
开发FLEX饮食问卷以评估水果、蔬菜、零食和饮料的消费情况,并与“儿童食物筛查量表”(BKFS)进行比较。使用Pearson相关系数分析相关性。使用Bland-Altman图评估一致性。
样本(n = 63)的平均年龄为9.9岁(标准差0.7)。大多数参与者是非西班牙裔白人(70%),有资格享受免费/低价午餐(57%)。除水果(r = 0.51)和含糖饮料(SSB)(r = 0.21)外,所有食物组类别之间的相关性均显著(P <.05)。我们发现报告的蔬菜、咸味零食、甜味零食、总饮料、牛奶和果汁消费量之间存在中度至强相关性(分别为0.62、0.59、0.69、0.47、0.48和0.46)。与BKFS(0.05 - 0.51)相比,FLEX筛查工具报告的每日平均摄入量系统性更高(0.24 - 1.1)。
基于这些相关性,FLEX饮食问卷在评估三至五年级不同人群中摄入不足和过量食物组的摄入量方面,表现与经过验证的工具相似。总体份量差异可能是由于FLEX问卷上的食物项目更相关,以及格式对儿童更友好。本研究强调需要更新旧的饮食筛查工具以反映当前儿童的消费模式。