• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Youth's Daily Activities and Situational Triggers of Gunshot Assault in Urban Environments.青年日常活动与城市环境枪击袭击的情境触发因素。
J Adolesc Health. 2017 Dec;61(6):779-785. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
2
Mapping Activity Patterns to Quantify Risk of Violent Assault in Urban Environments.绘制活动模式以量化城市环境中暴力袭击的风险。
Epidemiology. 2016 Jan;27(1):32-41. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000395.
3
A momentary exposures analysis of proximity to alcohol outlets and risk for assault.靠近酒精饮料销售点与袭击风险的瞬时暴露分析。
Addiction. 2017 Feb;112(2):269-278. doi: 10.1111/add.13637. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
4
The Association Between Urban Tree Cover and Gun Assault: A Case-Control and Case-Crossover Study.城市树木覆盖率与枪支袭击之间的关联:一项病例对照和病例交叉研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 1;186(3):289-296. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx096.
5
Adult Connection in Assault Injury Prevention among Male Youth in Low-Resource Urban Environments.成人联系在资源匮乏城市环境中预防男性青年遭受攻击伤害中的作用。
J Urban Health. 2018 Jun;95(3):361-371. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0260-8.
6
Neighborhoods, daily activities, and measuring health risks experienced in urban environments.社区、日常活动与城市环境中健康风险的衡量。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Dec;71(11):1943-50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Sep 29.
7
Quantifying Disparities in Urban Firearm Violence by Race and Place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: A Cartographic Study.宾夕法尼亚州费城按种族和地点对城市枪支暴力差异进行量化:一项制图研究
Am J Public Health. 2017 Mar;107(3):371-373. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303620. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
8
Tragic, but not random: the social contagion of nonfatal gunshot injuries.悲惨,但并非随机:非致命枪伤的社会传播效应
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;125:139-50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.056. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
9
Modeling Contagion Through Social Networks to Explain and Predict Gunshot Violence in Chicago, 2006 to 2014.通过社交网络建模传染病,以解释和预测 2006 年至 2014 年芝加哥的枪击暴力事件。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):326-333. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8245.
10
Urban community characteristics and adolescent assault victims.城市社区特征与青少年袭击受害者。
WMJ. 2007 Oct;106(7):394-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Firearm possession among emergency department youth and young adults: A latent class analysis.急诊科青少年和青年人群中的枪支持有情况:一项潜在类别分析。
Prev Med. 2025 Jan;190:108183. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108183. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
2
Risk and Protective Factors for Firearm Assault Injuries Among Black Men: A Scoping Review of Research.黑人男性枪支攻击伤害的风险和保护因素:研究范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jul;25(3):2468-2488. doi: 10.1177/15248380231217042. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
3
Youth Firearm Injury: A Review for Pediatric Critical Care Clinicians.青少年火器伤:儿科危重病临床医生的综述。
Crit Care Clin. 2023 Apr;39(2):357-371. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Communities, Streets, and People: A Multi-level Study of the Correlates of Victimization.社区、街道与人群:受害相关因素的多层次研究
Vict Offender. 2022;17(8):1116-1146. doi: 10.1080/15564886.2021.2018079. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
5
As Violence Unfolds: A Space-Time Study of Situational Triggers of Violent Victimization among Urban Youth.暴力事件展开之时:城市青少年暴力受害情境触发因素的时空研究
J Quant Criminol. 2020;36:119-152. doi: 10.1007/s10940-019-09419-8. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
6
Poor Health and Violent Crime Hot Spots: Mitigating the Undesirable Co-Occurrence Through Focused Place-Based Interventions.不良健康与暴力犯罪热点:通过有针对性的基于地点的干预措施减轻不良共存。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jun;58(6):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Risk and protective factors related to youth firearm violence: a scoping review and directions for future research.与青少年枪支暴力相关的风险和保护因素:范围综述及未来研究方向。
J Behav Med. 2019 Aug;42(4):706-723. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00076-7. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Prevention of Firearm Injuries Among Children and Adolescents: Consensus-Driven Research Agenda from the Firearm Safety Among Children and Teens (FACTS) Consortium.预防儿童和青少年枪支伤害:儿童和青少年枪支安全(FACTS)联盟基于共识的研究议程。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;173(8):780-789. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1494.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of greening and community reuse of vacant lots on crime.空地绿化及社区再利用对犯罪的影响。
Urban Stud. 2016 Nov;53(15):3279-3295. doi: 10.1177/0042098015608058. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
2
Escape from Violence: What Reduces the Enduring Consequences of Adolescent Gang Affiliation?逃离暴力:是什么减轻了青少年帮派关系带来的持久影响?
J Crim Justice. 2016 Dec;47:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
3
Youth violence: What we know and what we need to know.青少年暴力:我们已知和未知的。
Am Psychol. 2016 Jan;71(1):17-39. doi: 10.1037/a0039687.
4
Mapping Activity Patterns to Quantify Risk of Violent Assault in Urban Environments.绘制活动模式以量化城市环境中暴力袭击的风险。
Epidemiology. 2016 Jan;27(1):32-41. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000395.
5
Violence in the United States: Status, Challenges, and Opportunities.美国的暴力问题:现状、挑战与机遇
JAMA. 2015 Aug 4;314(5):478-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8371.
6
A simple strategy to transform health, all over the place.一个改变全球健康状况的简单策略。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Mar-Apr;20(2):157-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000051.
7
Fears of violence during morning travel to school.上学途中早晨时段的暴力恐惧。
J Adolesc Health. 2013 Jul;53(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.023. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
8
Greening vacant lots to reduce violent crime: a randomised controlled trial.将闲置空地绿化以减少暴力犯罪:一项随机对照试验。
Inj Prev. 2013 Jun;19(3):198-203. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040439. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
9
Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health.社会关系和支持与身心健康之间的联系机制。
J Health Soc Behav. 2011 Jun;52(2):145-61. doi: 10.1177/0022146510395592.
10
Variation in pediatric and adolescent firearm mortality rates in rural and urban US counties.美国农村和城市县儿科和青少年枪支死亡率的变化。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):1112-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3219. Epub 2010 May 24.

青年日常活动与城市环境枪击袭击的情境触发因素。

Youth's Daily Activities and Situational Triggers of Gunshot Assault in Urban Environments.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health. 2017 Dec;61(6):779-785. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.018
PMID:28947347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5701826/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Although previous research has made progress in identifying individuals predicted to face an elevated risk of being shot, it is not clear how that risk varies within individuals based on the contexts they encounter as they navigate daily life. The current study examines how the convergence of individual risk activity and neighborhood disadvantage and disorder triggers the risk of being shot.

METHODS

Using a novel geographic information system application, 123 male gunshot assault victims between 10 and 24 years old in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, described their minute-by-minute movements over the course of the day of the gunshot assault. Through latent class analysis, the primary exposure was real-life circumstance where nine theoretically informed risk factors converged, compared with two other circumstances. Case-crossover analyses of subjects' 10-minute segments of full-day activities compared gunshot assault victims at the time of assault with themselves earlier in the day.

RESULTS

Compared to when individuals were exposed to minimal situational risk or were mainly exposed to neighborhood disadvantage and disorder, the concurrence of risk activity and neighborhood disadvantage and disorder was associated with a 9.90 (95% CI: 2.72-36.14) and 6.06 (95% CI: 2.78-13.22) times higher risk of being shot. Importantly, the likelihood of being in the high-risk circumstance increased systematically over the course of the day leading up to the time when young individuals were shot.

CONCLUSIONS

After controlled individual's propensity to be shot (e.g., inherent traits), the concurrence of situational risks emerged as significant triggers of gunshot assault. The findings suggest potential for community-based gunshot violence interventions.

摘要

目的

尽管先前的研究在确定可能面临更高枪击风险的个体方面取得了进展,但尚不清楚个体在日常生活中遇到的环境下,其风险如何变化。本研究探讨了个体风险活动与邻里劣势和失序的交汇如何引发枪击风险。

方法

使用一种新颖的地理信息系统应用程序,研究人员调查了宾夕法尼亚州费城的 123 名 10 至 24 岁的男性枪击受害者,这些受害者在枪击事件发生当天描述了他们每分钟的活动情况。通过潜在类别分析,主要暴露于真实生活环境,即九个理论上有意义的风险因素交汇,与另外两种情况相比。对研究对象全天 10 分钟活动片段的病例交叉分析比较了枪击受害者在受攻击时与当天早些时候自己的情况。

结果

与个体暴露于最小情境风险或主要暴露于邻里劣势和失序时相比,风险活动与邻里劣势和失序的同时发生与枪击风险增加 9.90 倍(95% CI:2.72-36.14)和 6.06 倍(95% CI:2.78-13.22)有关。重要的是,在导致年轻人被枪击的时间之前,他们处于高风险环境中的可能性会随着时间的推移而系统地增加。

结论

在控制了个体被枪击的可能性(例如,固有特征)后,情境风险的同时发生成为枪击事件的重要触发因素。这些发现表明,基于社区的枪击暴力干预具有潜力。