Suppr超能文献

口服葡萄糖耐量试验中葡萄糖浓度曲线的形态可预测 1 型糖尿病的风险。

The shape of the glucose concentration curve during an oral glucose tolerance test predicts risk for type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Ave, FP 8129, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.

Pediatrics Epidemiology Center, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2018 Jan;61(1):84-92. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4453-6. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to examine: (1) whether specific glucose-response curve shapes during OGTTs are predictive of type 1 diabetes development; and (2) the extent to which the glucose-response curve is influenced by insulin secretion.

METHODS

Autoantibody-positive relatives of people with type 1 diabetes whose baseline OGTT met the definition of a monophasic or biphasic glucose-response curve were followed for the development of type 1 diabetes (n = 2627). A monophasic curve was defined as an increase in OGTT glucose between 30 and 90 min followed by a decline of ≥ 0.25 mmol/l between 90 and 120 min. A biphasic response curve was defined as a decrease in glucose after an initial increase, followed by a second increase of ≥ 0.25 mmol/l. Associations of type 1 diabetes risk with glucose curve shapes were examined using cumulative incidence curve comparisons and proportional hazards regression. C-peptide responses were compared with and without adjustments for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The majority of participants had a monophasic curve at baseline (n = 1732 [66%] vs n = 895 [34%]). The biphasic group had a lower cumulative incidence of type 1 diabetes (p < 0.001), which persisted after adjustments for age, sex, BMI z score and number of autoantibodies (p < 0.001). Among the monophasic group, the risk of type 1 diabetes was greater for those with a glucose peak at 90 min than for those with a peak at 30 min; the difference persisted after adjustments (p < 0.001). Compared with the biphasic group, the monophasic group had a lower early C-peptide (30-0 min) response, a lower C-peptide index (30-0 min C-peptide/30-0 min glucose), as well as a greater 2 h C-peptide level (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Those with biphasic glucose curves have a lower risk of progression to type 1 diabetes than those with monophasic curves, and the risk among the monophasic group is increased when the glucose peak occurs at 90 min than at 30 min. Differences in glucose curve shapes between the monophasic and biphasic groups appear to be related to C-peptide responses.

摘要

目的/假设:我们旨在检验:(1)口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)中特定的血糖反应曲线形状是否可预测 1 型糖尿病的发生;以及(2)血糖反应曲线受胰岛素分泌影响的程度。

方法

1 型糖尿病患者的一级亲属中,基线 OGTT 符合单相或双相血糖反应曲线定义者(n=2627),随访其 1 型糖尿病的发生情况。单相曲线定义为 30-90 分钟时 OGTT 血糖升高,90-120 分钟时升高≥0.25mmol/L。双相反应曲线定义为初始增加后葡萄糖下降,然后第二次增加≥0.25mmol/L。使用累积发病率曲线比较和比例风险回归检验 1 型糖尿病风险与血糖曲线形状的关系。比较有无潜在混杂因素调整后的 C 肽反应。

结果

大多数参与者在基线时表现为单相曲线(n=1732[66%] vs n=895[34%])。双相组的 1 型糖尿病累积发病率较低(p<0.001),经年龄、性别、BMI z 评分和自身抗体数量调整后仍如此(p<0.001)。在单相组中,90 分钟时血糖峰值者比 30 分钟时血糖峰值者发生 1 型糖尿病的风险更大;调整后差异仍然存在(p<0.001)。与双相组相比,单相组的早期 C 肽(30-0 分钟)反应较低,C 肽指数(30-0 分钟 C 肽/30-0 分钟血糖)较低,2 小时 C 肽水平较高(所有 p<0.001)。

结论/解释:双相血糖曲线者发生 1 型糖尿病的风险低于单相曲线者,而单相组中血糖峰值出现在 90 分钟时的风险高于 30 分钟时。单相和双相组之间的血糖曲线形状差异似乎与 C 肽反应有关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Index60 as an additional diagnostic criterion for type 1 diabetes.Index60 作为 1 型糖尿病的附加诊断标准。
Diabetologia. 2021 Apr;64(4):836-844. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05365-4. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验