Suppr超能文献

[医疗事故责任中专家意见的法律质量标准]

[Legal quality criteria of expert opinions in liability for medical malpractice].

作者信息

Neu Johann

出版信息

Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2017 Sep;49(4):224-228. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-115731. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

Abstract

In litigation regarding to liability for medical malpractice the court itself for lack of medical expert knowledge cannot judge a claimed error in treatment. That applies too for the question if there is causation between the error in treatment and claimed damage to patient's health. In this respect, the court is dependent on a medical expert and is bound to his assessment, unless there is no quality deficit in respect of medical and/or legal criteria. The more the medical expert knows the legal background of physician's liability for medical malpractice, the less is the risk of legal quality deficits in his expert opinion and thereby also of judicial errors by court.

摘要

在医疗事故责任诉讼中,法院本身由于缺乏医学专业知识,无法判断所声称的治疗失误。对于治疗失误与所声称的对患者健康损害之间是否存在因果关系的问题,情况也是如此。在这方面,法院依赖医学专家并受其评估约束,除非在医学和/或法律标准方面不存在质量缺陷。医学专家对医生医疗事故责任的法律背景了解得越多,其专家意见中出现法律质量缺陷以及进而导致法院司法错误的风险就越小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验