van Eenbergen Mies C, van de Poll-Franse Lonneke V, Heine Peter, Mols Floortje
Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
JMIR Cancer. 2017 Sep 28;3(2):e15. doi: 10.2196/cancer.7312.
In recent years, the question of how patients' participating in online communities affects various patient reported outcomes (PROs) has been investigated in several ways.
This study aimed to systematically review all relevant literature identified using key search terms, with regard to, first, changes in PROs for cancer patients who participate in online communities and, second, the characteristics of patients who report such effects.
A computerized search of the literature via PubMed (MEDLINE), PsycINFO (5 and 4 stars), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ScienceDirect was performed. Last search was conducted in June 2017. Studies with the following terms were included: (cancer patient) and (support group or health communities) and (online or Internet). A total of 21 studies were included and independently assessed by 2 investigators using an 11-item quality checklist.
The methodological quality of the selected studies varied: 12 were of high quality, eight were of adequate quality, and only one was of low quality. Most of the respondents were women (about 80%), most with breast cancer; their mean age was 50 years. The patients who were active in online support groups were mostly younger and more highly educated than the nonusers. The investigated PROs included general well-being (ie, mood and health), anxiety, depression, quality of life, posttraumatic growth, and cancer-related concerns. Only marginal effects-that is, PRO improvements-were found; in most cases they were insignificant, and in some cases they were contradictory.
The main shortcoming of this kind of study is the lack of methodological instruments for reliable measurements. Furthermore, some patients who participate in online communities or interact with peers via Internet do not expect to measure changes in their PROs. If cancer survivors want to meet other survivors and share information or get support, online communities can be a trustworthy and reliable platform to facilitate opportunities or possibilities to make this happen.
近年来,患者参与在线社区如何影响各种患者报告结局(PROs)的问题已通过多种方式进行了研究。
本研究旨在系统回顾使用关键检索词识别出的所有相关文献,首先关注参与在线社区的癌症患者PROs的变化,其次关注报告此类影响的患者特征。
通过PubMed(MEDLINE)、PsycINFO(5星和4星)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和ScienceDirect对文献进行计算机检索。最后一次检索于2017年6月进行。纳入了包含以下术语的研究:(癌症患者)和(支持小组或健康社区)和(在线或互联网)。共纳入21项研究,并由2名研究人员使用11项质量清单进行独立评估。
所选研究的方法学质量各不相同:12项为高质量,8项质量尚可,只有1项质量较低。大多数受访者为女性(约80%),大多数患有乳腺癌;她们的平均年龄为50岁。活跃于在线支持小组的患者大多比不使用者更年轻、受教育程度更高。所调查的PROs包括总体幸福感(即情绪和健康)、焦虑、抑郁、生活质量、创伤后成长以及与癌症相关的担忧。仅发现了微小影响,即PROs有所改善;在大多数情况下,这些影响不显著,在某些情况下甚至相互矛盾。
这类研究的主要缺点是缺乏用于可靠测量的方法学工具。此外,一些参与在线社区或通过互联网与同龄人互动的患者并不期望测量其PROs的变化。如果癌症幸存者想要结识其他幸存者并分享信息或获得支持,在线社区可以成为一个值得信赖且可靠的平台,为实现这一目标提供便利机会。