• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ACTAPORT 评分用于预测成人心脏手术围术期输血风险。

The ACTA PORT-score for predicting perioperative risk of blood transfusion for adult cardiac surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Medical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2017 Sep 1;119(3):394-401. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex205.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aex205
PMID:28969306
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A simple and accurate scoring system to predict risk of transfusion for patients undergoing cardiac surgery is lacking.

METHODS

We identified independent risk factors associated with transfusion by performing univariate analysis, followed by logistic regression. We then simplified the score to an integer-based system and tested it using the area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUC) statistic with a Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Finally, the scoring system was applied to the external validation dataset and the same statistical methods applied to test the accuracy of the ACTA-PORT score.

RESULTS

Several factors were independently associated with risk of transfusion, including age, sex, body surface area, logistic EuroSCORE, preoperative haemoglobin and creatinine, and type of surgery. In our primary dataset, the score accurately predicted risk of perioperative transfusion in cardiac surgery patients with an AUC of 0.76. The external validation confirmed accuracy of the scoring method with an AUC of 0.84 and good agreement across all scores, with a minor tendency to under-estimate transfusion risk in very high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACTA-PORT score is a reliable, validated tool for predicting risk of transfusion for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This and other scores can be used in research studies for risk adjustment when assessing outcomes, and might also be incorporated into a Patient Blood Management programme.

摘要

背景

缺乏一种简单而准确的评分系统来预测接受心脏手术的患者的输血风险。

方法

我们通过单因素分析确定与输血相关的独立风险因素,然后进行逻辑回归。接着,我们将评分简化为整数制系统,并使用接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)下的面积(AUC)统计量以及 Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验进行测试。最后,我们将评分系统应用于外部验证数据集,并应用相同的统计方法来检验 ACTA-PORT 评分的准确性。

结果

几个因素与输血风险独立相关,包括年龄、性别、体表面积、逻辑 EuroSCORE、术前血红蛋白和肌酐以及手术类型。在我们的主要数据集,该评分准确预测了心脏手术患者围手术期输血的风险,AUC 为 0.76。外部验证证实了评分方法的准确性,AUC 为 0.84,并且在所有评分中均具有良好的一致性,只是在极高风险患者中存在轻微的低估输血风险的趋势。

结论

ACTA-PORT 评分是一种可靠的、经过验证的预测心脏手术患者输血风险的工具。该评分和其他评分可用于研究中评估结果时的风险调整,也可纳入患者血液管理计划。

相似文献

1
The ACTA PORT-score for predicting perioperative risk of blood transfusion for adult cardiac surgery.ACTAPORT 评分用于预测成人心脏手术围术期输血风险。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Sep 1;119(3):394-401. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex205.
2
External Validation of the ACTA-PORT Transfusion Risk Score in Older Cardiac Surgery Patients at Risk of Frailty.老年脆弱型心脏手术患者 ACTA-PORT 输血风险评分的外部验证。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Aug;36(8 Pt B):2983-2990. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.02.029. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
3
Evaluation of risk scores in predicting perioperative blood transfusions in adult cardiac surgery.评估风险评分在预测成人心脏手术围手术期输血中的作用。
Ann Card Anaesth. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):73-78. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_18_18.
4
A transfusion risk stratification score to facilitate quality management in cardiopulmonary bypass.用于体外循环中质量管理的输血风险分层评分。
Transfusion. 2023 Aug;63(8):1495-1505. doi: 10.1111/trf.17487. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
5
AntiPORT: adaptation of a transfusion prediction score to an Australian cardiac surgery population.AntiPORT:将输血预测评分应用于澳大利亚心脏手术人群
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 16;24(4):360-368. doi: 10.51893/2022.4.OA6. eCollection 2022 Dec 5.
6
Risk scores to facilitate preoperative prediction of transfusion and large volume blood transfusion associated with adult cardiac surgery.风险评分模型以辅助预测成人心脏手术相关的输血和大量输血。
Br J Anaesth. 2015 May;114(5):757-66. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu483. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
7
Predicting transfusions in cardiac surgery: the easier, the better: the Transfusion Risk and Clinical Knowledge score.预测心脏手术中的输血情况:越简便越好:输血风险与临床知识评分
Vox Sang. 2009 May;96(4):324-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01160.x. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
8
Validation of Blood Transfusion Risk Scores (TRACK and TRUST) in a Cardiac Surgery Service in Brazil.巴西心脏外科服务中输血风险评分(TRACK 和 TRUST)的验证。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Apr 23;38(2):227-234. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0156.
9
Development and validation of Transfusion Risk Understanding Scoring Tool (TRUST) to stratify cardiac surgery patients according to their blood transfusion needs.输血风险理解评分工具(TRUST)的开发与验证,用于根据心脏手术患者的输血需求对其进行分层。
Transfusion. 2006 Jul;46(7):1120-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00860.x.
10
Perioperative Blood Transfusions Are Associated with a Higher Incidence of Thromboembolic Events After TKA: An Analysis of 333,463 TKAs.关节置换术后围手术期输血与 TKA 后血栓栓塞事件发生率升高相关:333463 例 TKA 的分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Mar 1;479(3):589-600. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001513.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of scoring systems for bleeding in open cardiac surgery patients.心脏直视手术患者出血评分系统的比较
Turk J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 17;55(4):868-876. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.6039. eCollection 2025.
2
Centrifugation versus filtration-based cell salvage: impact on perioperative bleeding in cardiac surgery-the COLTRANE randomised clinical trial - study protocol.基于离心与过滤的细胞回收:对心脏手术围手术期出血的影响——COLTRANE随机临床试验——研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 16;15(7):e099423. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099423.
3
Prognostic models for prediction of perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in adult cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
预测成人心脏手术围手术期异体红细胞输血的预后模型:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transfusion. 2025 Feb;65(2):397-409. doi: 10.1111/trf.18108. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
4
Predicting blood transfusion demand in intensive care patients after surgery by comparative analysis of temporally extended data selection.通过对时间扩展数据选择的比较分析预测术后重症监护患者的输血需求。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02800-z.
5
Cost Reduction in Blood Transfusions After Implementation of Decision Protocol Based on Hemoglobin and Anemia Symptoms: A Pre-Post Analysis.基于血红蛋白和贫血症状的决策方案实施后输血成本的降低:一项前后分析
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Dec 4;30:e945854. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945854.
6
Strategies to prevent blood loss and reduce transfusion in emergency general surgery, WSES-AAST consensus paper.紧急普通外科中预防失血和减少输血的策略,WSES-AAST 共识文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Jul 16;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00554-7.
7
A Novel Scoring System Predicting Red Blood Cell Transfusion Requirements in Patients Undergoing Invasive Spine Surgery.一种预测接受侵入性脊柱手术患者红细胞输血需求的新型评分系统。
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 7;13(4):948. doi: 10.3390/jcm13040948.
8
AntiPORT: adaptation of a transfusion prediction score to an Australian cardiac surgery population.AntiPORT:将输血预测评分应用于澳大利亚心脏手术人群
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Oct 16;24(4):360-368. doi: 10.51893/2022.4.OA6. eCollection 2022 Dec 5.
9
Development of a Novel Prediction Model for Red Blood Cell Transfusion Risk in Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术中红细胞输血风险新型预测模型的开发
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 17;12(16):5345. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165345.
10
The Management and Antithrombotic Strategies of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and High Bleeding Risk.《冠心病合并高出血风险患者的管理与抗栓策略》
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Jul;25(7):669-680. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01893-8. Epub 2023 Jun 7.