Maxfield Nathan D, Morris Kalie, Frisch Stefan A, Morphew Kathryn, Constantine Joseph L
University of South Florida, College of Behavioral & Community Sciences, Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, USA.
University of South Florida, College of Behavioral & Community Sciences, Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Feb;126(2):284-96. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 May 20.
The aim was to compare real-time language/cognitive processing in picture naming in adults who stutter (AWS) versus typically-fluent adults (TFA).
Participants named pictures preceded by masked prime words. Primes and target picture labels were identical or mismatched. Priming effects on naming and picture-elicited ERP activity were analyzed. Vocabulary knowledge correlations with these measures were assessed.
Priming improved naming RTs and accuracy in both groups. RTs were longer for AWS, and correlated positively with receptive vocabulary in TFA. Electrophysiologically, posterior-P1 amplitude negatively correlated with expressive vocabulary in TFA versus receptive vocabulary in AWS. Frontal/temporal-P1 amplitude correlated positively with expressive vocabulary in AWS. Identity priming enhanced frontal/posterior-N2 amplitude in both groups, and attenuated P280 amplitude in AWS. N400 priming was topographically-restricted in AWS.
Results suggest that conceptual knowledge was perceptually-grounded in expressive vocabulary in TFA versus receptive vocabulary in AWS. Poorer expressive vocabulary in AWS was potentially associated with greater suppression of irrelevant conceptual information. Priming enhanced N2-indexed cognitive control and visual attention in both groups. P280-indexed focal attention attenuated with priming in AWS only. Topographically-restricted N400 priming suggests that lemma/word form connections were weaker in AWS.
Real-time language/cognitive processing in picture naming operates differently in AWS.
比较口吃成年人(AWS)与语言流畅成年人(TFA)在图片命名中的实时语言/认知加工过程。
参与者对由掩蔽启动词引导的图片进行命名。启动词与目标图片标签相同或不匹配。分析启动对命名和图片诱发的ERP活动的影响。评估词汇知识与这些指标的相关性。
启动改善了两组的命名反应时和准确性。AWS的反应时更长,且与TFA的接受性词汇呈正相关。在电生理方面,TFA中后部P1波幅与表达性词汇呈负相关,而AWS中与接受性词汇呈负相关。AWS中额叶/颞叶P1波幅与表达性词汇呈正相关。同一性启动增强了两组的额叶/后部N2波幅,并减弱了AWS中的P280波幅。AWS中N400启动在地形学上受到限制。
结果表明,在TFA中概念知识在表达性词汇中基于感知,而在AWS中基于接受性词汇。AWS中较差的表达性词汇可能与对无关概念信息的更大抑制有关。启动增强了两组中由N2指标的认知控制和视觉注意。仅在AWS中,由P280指标的焦点注意随着启动而减弱。地形学上受限的N400启动表明AWS中词元/词形连接较弱。
图片命名中的实时语言/认知加工在AWS中运作方式不同。