• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无语言模型情况下因果结构的发展

The Development of Causal Structure without a Language Model.

作者信息

Rissman Lilia, Goldin-Meadow Susan

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago.

Center for Gesture, Sign, and Language, University of Chicago.

出版信息

Lang Learn Dev. 2017;13(3):286-299. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1254633. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1080/15475441.2016.1254633
PMID:28983210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5624539/
Abstract

Across a diverse range of languages, children proceed through similar stages in their production of causal language: their initial verbs lack internal causal structure, followed by a period during which they produce causative overgeneralizations, indicating knowledge of a productive causative rule. We asked in this study whether a child not exposed to structured linguistic input could create linguistic devices for encoding causation and, if so, whether the emergence of this causal language would follow a trajectory similar to the one observed for children learning language from linguistic input. We show that the child in our study did develop causation-encoding morphology, but only after initially using verbs that lacked internal causal structure. These results suggest that the ability to encode causation linguistically can emerge in the absence of a language model, and that exposure to linguistic input is not the only factor guiding children from one stage to the next in their production of causal language.

摘要

在多种语言中,儿童在因果语言表达上会经历相似的阶段:他们最初使用的动词缺乏内部因果结构,随后会进入一个过度泛化使役动词的阶段,这表明他们掌握了一种生成性的使役规则。在本研究中,我们探讨了一个未接触过结构化语言输入的儿童是否能够创造出用于编码因果关系的语言手段,如果可以,这种因果语言的出现是否会遵循与从语言输入中学习语言的儿童所观察到的轨迹相似的轨迹。我们发现,我们研究中的儿童确实发展出了编码因果关系的形态,但这是在最初使用缺乏内部因果结构的动词之后。这些结果表明,在没有语言模型的情况下,语言编码因果关系的能力也可能出现,并且接触语言输入并不是引导儿童在因果语言表达中从一个阶段过渡到下一个阶段的唯一因素。

相似文献

1
The Development of Causal Structure without a Language Model.无语言模型情况下因果结构的发展
Lang Learn Dev. 2017;13(3):286-299. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1254633. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
2
Systematicity, but not compositionality: Examining the emergence of linguistic structure in children and adults using iterated learning.系统性而非构成性:使用迭代学习研究儿童和成人语言结构的出现。
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:160-173. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
3
How Children and Adults Encode Causative Events Cross-Linguistically: Implications for Language Production and Attention.儿童和成人如何跨语言编码因果事件:对语言产生和注意力的影响
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(8):1015-1037. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1175649. Epub 2016 May 13.
4
Does Variability Across Events Affect Verb Learning in English, Mandarin, and Korean?事件间的变异性会影响英语、汉语和韩语的动词学习吗?
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):808-830. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12398. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
5
Statistical evidence that a child can create a combinatorial linguistic system without external linguistic input: Implications for language evolution.统计证据表明,儿童可以在没有外部语言输入的情况下创造出组合语言系统:对语言进化的启示。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt B):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
6
Statistical language learning: computational, maturational, and linguistic constraints.统计语言学习:计算、成熟和语言限制。
Lang Cogn. 2016 Sep;8(3):447-461. doi: 10.1017/langcog.2016.20. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
7
Early acquisition of verbs in Korean: a cross-linguistic study.韩语中动词的早期习得:一项跨语言研究。
J Child Lang. 1995 Oct;22(3):497-529. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900009934.
8
Gestural communication in deaf children: the effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development.聋儿的手势交流:父母输入对早期语言发展的影响及非影响因素
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1984;49(3-4):1-151.
9
Learning language in autism: maternal linguistic input contributes to later vocabulary.自闭症患者的语言学习:母亲的语言输入对后期词汇量有影响。
Autism Res. 2015 Apr;8(2):214-23. doi: 10.1002/aur.1440. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
10
Early lexical development in English- and Korean-speaking children: language-general and language-specific patterns.说英语和韩语儿童的早期词汇发展:通用语言和特定语言模式。
J Child Lang. 2000 Jun;27(2):225-54. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900004104.

引用本文的文献

1
Whole-to-part development in language creation.语言创造中的整体到部分发展。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 Jan;29(1):12-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.015. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German.证据表明英语、荷兰语和德语共享一个工具原型。
Cogn Sci. 2022 May;46(5):e13140. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13140.
3
The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language.从主体背景化看交际的重要性:来自主体语言和尼加拉瓜手语的证据。

本文引用的文献

1
Watching language grow in the manual modality: nominals, predicates, and handshapes.观察手势语中语言的发展:名词、谓语和手势形状。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:381-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.029. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
2
Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic sources of a handshape distinction expressing agentivity.表达施事性的手部形状区别的认知、文化和语言来源。
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;7(1):95-123. doi: 10.1111/tops.12123. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
3
How handshape type can distinguish between nouns and verbs in homesign.手势形状类型如何在家庭手语中区分名词和动词。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104332. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104332. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
4
Young children spontaneously recreate core properties of language in a new modality.幼儿会自发地在新的模态中重新创造语言的核心属性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 17;116(51):26072-26077. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904871116. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?主题角色:核心知识还是语言结构?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1850-1869. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01634-5.
6
The development of iconicity in children's co-speech gesture and homesign.儿童伴随言语手势和家庭手语中象似性的发展。
LIA. 2017;8(1):42-68. doi: 10.1075/lia.8.1.03car. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
Gesture (Amst). 2013;175:354-376. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.3.05hun.
4
From iconic handshapes to grammatical contrasts: longitudinal evidence from a child homesigner.从标志性的手势到语法对比:来自一名家庭手语使用者的纵向证据。
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 21;5:830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00830. eCollection 2014.
5
On the way to language: event segmentation in homesign and gesture.通往语言之路:家庭手语和手势中的事件分割
J Child Lang. 2015 Jan;42(1):64-94. doi: 10.1017/S0305000913000512. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
6
Acquiring word class distinctions in American Sign Language: Evidence from handshape.美国手语中词类区分的习得:来自手型的证据。
Lang Learn Dev. 2013 Apr;9(2):130-150. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2012.679540.
7
Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system.手势语系统中的否定、疑问和结构构建。
Cognition. 2011 Mar;118(3):398-416. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.017. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
8
Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system: Building nominal constituents in homesign.自创交流系统中的层级结构:在家庭手语中构建名词性成分。
Language (Baltim). 2012 Dec 1;88(4):732-763. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0092.
9
Acquiring causatives in Taiwan Southern Min.获取闽南语中的使役动词
J Child Lang. 2008 May;35(2):467-87. doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008550.
10
How children make language out of gesture: morphological structure in gesture systems developed by American and Chinese deaf children.儿童如何从手势中创造语言:美国和中国失聪儿童所发展的手势系统中的形态结构。
Cogn Psychol. 2007 Sep;55(2):87-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Oct 27.