• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手势形状类型如何在家庭手语中区分名词和动词。

How handshape type can distinguish between nouns and verbs in homesign.

作者信息

Hunsicker Dea, Goldin-Meadow Susan

机构信息

University of Chicago.

出版信息

Gesture (Amst). 2013;175:354-376. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.3.05hun.

DOI:10.1075/gest.13.3.05hun
PMID:25435844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4245027/
Abstract

All established languages, spoken or signed, make a distinction between nouns and verbs. Even a young sign language emerging within a family of deaf individuals has been found to mark the noun-verb distinction, and to use handshape type to do so. Here we ask whether handshape type is used to mark the noun-verb distinction in a gesture system invented by a deaf child who does not have access to a usable model of either spoken or signed language. The child produces homesigns that have linguistic structure, but receives from his hearing parents co-speech gestures that are structured differently from his own gestures. Thus, unlike users of established and emerging languages, the homesigner is a producer of his system but does not receive it from others. Nevertheless, we found that the child used handshape type to mark the distinction between nouns and verbs at the early stages of development. The noun-verb distinction is thus so fundamental to language that it can arise in a homesign system not shared with others. We also found that the child abandoned handshape type as a device for distinguishing nouns from verbs at just the moment when he developed a combinatorial system of handshape and motion components that marked the distinction. The way the noun-verb distinction is marked thus depends on the full array of linguistic devices available within the system.

摘要

所有已确立的语言,无论是口语还是手语,都对名词和动词加以区分。即便在一个聋人家庭中出现的一种新兴手语,也被发现能够体现名词与动词的区别,并且通过手型类别来做到这一点。在此,我们要探究的是,在一个没有接触过任何可用口语或手语模式的失聪儿童所发明的手势系统中,手型类别是否被用于体现名词与动词的区别。这个儿童创造出了具有语言结构的家庭手语,但从他有听力的父母那里接收到的伴随言语的手势,其结构与他自己的手势不同。因此,与已确立语言和新兴语言的使用者不同,这个使用家庭手语的人是其系统的创造者,而非从他人那里习得该系统。然而,我们发现这个儿童在发展的早期阶段就使用手型类别来区分名词和动词。名词与动词的区别对于语言来说是如此基础,以至于它能够在一个不与他人共享的家庭手语系统中出现。我们还发现,就在这个儿童发展出一个通过手型和动作成分的组合系统来体现这种区别的时候,他不再使用手型类别作为区分名词和动词的手段。因此,名词与动词的区别的体现方式取决于该系统中可用的全部语言手段。

相似文献

1
How handshape type can distinguish between nouns and verbs in homesign.手势形状类型如何在家庭手语中区分名词和动词。
Gesture (Amst). 2013;175:354-376. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.3.05hun.
2
Communicating about quantity without a language model: number devices in homesign grammar.在没有语言模型的情况下进行数量交流:手势语法中的数字设备。
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Aug-Sep;67(1-2):1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
3
Nouns and verbs in a self-styled gesture system: what's in a name?自成一体的手势系统中的名词和动词:名称中有什么?
Cogn Psychol. 1994 Dec;27(3):259-319. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1994.1018.
4
Watching language grow in the manual modality: nominals, predicates, and handshapes.观察手势语中语言的发展:名词、谓语和手势形状。
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:381-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.029. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
5
Structural biases that children bring to language learning: A cross-cultural look at gestural input to homesign.儿童在语言学习中所具有的结构偏向:对家庭手语手势输入的跨文化研究。
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104608. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104608. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Acquiring word class distinctions in American Sign Language: Evidence from handshape.美国手语中词类区分的习得:来自手型的证据。
Lang Learn Dev. 2013 Apr;9(2):130-150. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2012.679540.
7
Effects of gesture+verbal treatment for noun and verb retrieval in aphasia.手势+言语治疗对失语症患者名词和动词检索的影响。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Nov;12(6):867-82. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706061042.
8
Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system: Building nominal constituents in homesign.自创交流系统中的层级结构:在家庭手语中构建名词性成分。
Language (Baltim). 2012 Dec 1;88(4):732-763. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0092.
9
From iconic handshapes to grammatical contrasts: longitudinal evidence from a child homesigner.从标志性的手势到语法对比:来自一名家庭手语使用者的纵向证据。
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 21;5:830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00830. eCollection 2014.
10
Early development of nouns and verbs in French: exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar.法语中名词和动词的早期发展:探索词汇与语法之间的接口
J Child Lang. 2000 Oct;27(3):521-59. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900004396.

引用本文的文献

1
The iconic motivation for the morphophonological distinction between noun-verb pairs in American Sign Language does not reflect common human construals of objects and actions.美国手语中名词-动词对之间形态音位差异的标志性动机并不反映人类对物体和动作的普遍理解。
Lang Cogn. 2022 Dec;14(4):622-644. doi: 10.1017/langcog.2022.20. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
2
The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language.从主体背景化看交际的重要性:来自主体语言和尼加拉瓜手语的证据。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104332. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104332. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Language Emergence.

本文引用的文献

1
Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system.手势语系统中的否定、疑问和结构构建。
Cognition. 2011 Mar;118(3):398-416. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.017. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
2
Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system: Building nominal constituents in homesign.自创交流系统中的层级结构:在家庭手语中构建名词性成分。
Language (Baltim). 2012 Dec 1;88(4):732-763. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0092.
3
Language emergence: clues from a new bedouin sign.语言的出现:来自一种新的贝都因手势的线索。
语言的出现。
Annu Rev Linguist. 2017;3:363-388. doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040743.
4
The development of iconicity in children's co-speech gesture and homesign.儿童伴随言语手势和家庭手语中象似性的发展。
LIA. 2017;8(1):42-68. doi: 10.1075/lia.8.1.03car. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
5
The Development of Causal Structure without a Language Model.无语言模型情况下因果结构的发展
Lang Learn Dev. 2017;13(3):286-299. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1254633. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
6
Widening the lens: what the manual modality reveals about language, learning and cognition.拓展视野:手工模式揭示的语言、学习与认知
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 19;369(1651):20130295. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0295.
Curr Biol. 2005 Jun 21;15(12):R463-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.018.
4
The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language.语法的出现:新语言中的系统结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 15;102(7):2661-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405448102. Epub 2005 Feb 7.
5
DISTURBANCE OF GESTURE AND PANTOMIME IN APHASIA.失语症中的手势和哑剧障碍
Brain. 1963 Dec;86:703-20. doi: 10.1093/brain/86.4.703.
6
A cross-linguistic examination of the noun-category bias: its existence and specificity in French- and Spanish-speaking preschool-aged children.名词类别偏差的跨语言研究:其在说法语和西班牙语的学龄前儿童中的存在及特殊性
Cogn Psychol. 1997 Apr;32(3):183-218. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0650.
7
Silence is liberating: removing the handcuffs on grammatical expression in the manual modality.沉默具有解放作用:解除了手动方式下语法表达的束缚。
Psychol Rev. 1996 Jan;103(1):34-55. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.34.
8
Preschool children's symbolic representation of objects through gestures.学龄前儿童通过手势对物体进行的象征性表征。
Child Dev. 1993 Jun;64(3):729-35.
9
Nouns and verbs in a self-styled gesture system: what's in a name?自成一体的手势系统中的名词和动词:名称中有什么?
Cogn Psychol. 1994 Dec;27(3):259-319. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1994.1018.
10
Using representations: comprehension and production of actions with imagined objects.运用表象:对想象物体的动作理解与生成
Child Dev. 1995 Aug;66(4):999-1010.