Suppr超能文献

手势形状类型如何在家庭手语中区分名词和动词。

How handshape type can distinguish between nouns and verbs in homesign.

作者信息

Hunsicker Dea, Goldin-Meadow Susan

机构信息

University of Chicago.

出版信息

Gesture (Amst). 2013;175:354-376. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.3.05hun.

Abstract

All established languages, spoken or signed, make a distinction between nouns and verbs. Even a young sign language emerging within a family of deaf individuals has been found to mark the noun-verb distinction, and to use handshape type to do so. Here we ask whether handshape type is used to mark the noun-verb distinction in a gesture system invented by a deaf child who does not have access to a usable model of either spoken or signed language. The child produces homesigns that have linguistic structure, but receives from his hearing parents co-speech gestures that are structured differently from his own gestures. Thus, unlike users of established and emerging languages, the homesigner is a producer of his system but does not receive it from others. Nevertheless, we found that the child used handshape type to mark the distinction between nouns and verbs at the early stages of development. The noun-verb distinction is thus so fundamental to language that it can arise in a homesign system not shared with others. We also found that the child abandoned handshape type as a device for distinguishing nouns from verbs at just the moment when he developed a combinatorial system of handshape and motion components that marked the distinction. The way the noun-verb distinction is marked thus depends on the full array of linguistic devices available within the system.

摘要

所有已确立的语言,无论是口语还是手语,都对名词和动词加以区分。即便在一个聋人家庭中出现的一种新兴手语,也被发现能够体现名词与动词的区别,并且通过手型类别来做到这一点。在此,我们要探究的是,在一个没有接触过任何可用口语或手语模式的失聪儿童所发明的手势系统中,手型类别是否被用于体现名词与动词的区别。这个儿童创造出了具有语言结构的家庭手语,但从他有听力的父母那里接收到的伴随言语的手势,其结构与他自己的手势不同。因此,与已确立语言和新兴语言的使用者不同,这个使用家庭手语的人是其系统的创造者,而非从他人那里习得该系统。然而,我们发现这个儿童在发展的早期阶段就使用手型类别来区分名词和动词。名词与动词的区别对于语言来说是如此基础,以至于它能够在一个不与他人共享的家庭手语系统中出现。我们还发现,就在这个儿童发展出一个通过手型和动作成分的组合系统来体现这种区别的时候,他不再使用手型类别作为区分名词和动词的手段。因此,名词与动词的区别的体现方式取决于该系统中可用的全部语言手段。

相似文献

1
How handshape type can distinguish between nouns and verbs in homesign.
Gesture (Amst). 2013;175:354-376. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.3.05hun.
2
Communicating about quantity without a language model: number devices in homesign grammar.
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Aug-Sep;67(1-2):1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
3
Nouns and verbs in a self-styled gesture system: what's in a name?
Cogn Psychol. 1994 Dec;27(3):259-319. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1994.1018.
4
Watching language grow in the manual modality: nominals, predicates, and handshapes.
Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:381-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.029. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
5
Structural biases that children bring to language learning: A cross-cultural look at gestural input to homesign.
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104608. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104608. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Acquiring word class distinctions in American Sign Language: Evidence from handshape.
Lang Learn Dev. 2013 Apr;9(2):130-150. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2012.679540.
7
Effects of gesture+verbal treatment for noun and verb retrieval in aphasia.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Nov;12(6):867-82. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706061042.
8
Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system: Building nominal constituents in homesign.
Language (Baltim). 2012 Dec 1;88(4):732-763. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0092.
9
From iconic handshapes to grammatical contrasts: longitudinal evidence from a child homesigner.
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 21;5:830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00830. eCollection 2014.
10
Early development of nouns and verbs in French: exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar.
J Child Lang. 2000 Oct;27(3):521-59. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900004396.

引用本文的文献

2
The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language.
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104332. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104332. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Language Emergence.
Annu Rev Linguist. 2017;3:363-388. doi: 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040743.
4
The development of iconicity in children's co-speech gesture and homesign.
LIA. 2017;8(1):42-68. doi: 10.1075/lia.8.1.03car. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
5
The Development of Causal Structure without a Language Model.
Lang Learn Dev. 2017;13(3):286-299. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1254633. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
6
Widening the lens: what the manual modality reveals about language, learning and cognition.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 19;369(1651):20130295. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0295.

本文引用的文献

1
Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system.
Cognition. 2011 Mar;118(3):398-416. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.017. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
2
Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system: Building nominal constituents in homesign.
Language (Baltim). 2012 Dec 1;88(4):732-763. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0092.
3
Language emergence: clues from a new bedouin sign.
Curr Biol. 2005 Jun 21;15(12):R463-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.018.
4
The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 15;102(7):2661-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405448102. Epub 2005 Feb 7.
5
DISTURBANCE OF GESTURE AND PANTOMIME IN APHASIA.
Brain. 1963 Dec;86:703-20. doi: 10.1093/brain/86.4.703.
7
Silence is liberating: removing the handcuffs on grammatical expression in the manual modality.
Psychol Rev. 1996 Jan;103(1):34-55. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.34.
9
Nouns and verbs in a self-styled gesture system: what's in a name?
Cogn Psychol. 1994 Dec;27(3):259-319. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1994.1018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验