Suppr超能文献

种族如何影响决定开枪时的证据积累。

How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot.

机构信息

Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195, Berlin, Germany.

Psychology Building, Michigan State University, 316 Physics Road, Room 255, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1301-1330. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6.

Abstract

The biasing role of stereotypes is a central theme in social cognition research. For example, to understand the role of race in police officers' decisions to shoot, participants have been shown images of Black and White males and instructed to shoot only if the target is holding a gun. Findings show that Black targets are shot more frequently and more quickly than Whites. The decision to shoot has typically been modeled and understood as a signal detection process in which a sample of information is compared against a criterion, with the criterion set for Black targets being lower. We take a different approach, modeling the decision to shoot as a dynamic process in which evidence is accumulated over time until a threshold is reached. The model accounts for both the choice and response time data for both correct and incorrect decisions using a single set of parameters. Across four studies, this dynamic perspective revealed that the target's race did not create an initial bias to shoot Black targets. Instead, race impacted the rate of evidence accumulation with evidence accumulating faster to shoot for Black targets. Some participants also tended to be more cautious with Black targets, setting higher decision thresholds. Besides providing a more cohesive and richer account of the decision to shoot or not, the dynamic model suggests interventions that may address the use of race information in decisions to shoot and a means to measure their effectiveness.

摘要

刻板印象的偏差作用是社会认知研究的一个核心主题。例如,为了了解种族在警察决定开枪中的作用,参与者被展示了黑人和白人男性的图像,并被指示只有在目标持有枪支时才开枪。研究结果表明,黑人目标被射击的频率和速度都高于白人。开枪的决定通常被建模和理解为一个信号检测过程,其中一个信息样本与一个标准进行比较,而黑人目标的标准设置得更低。我们采取了一种不同的方法,将开枪的决定建模为一个动态过程,在这个过程中,证据随着时间的推移而积累,直到达到一个阈值。该模型使用一组单一的参数来解释正确和错误决策的选择和反应时间数据。在四项研究中,这种动态视角表明,目标的种族并没有对射击黑人目标产生初始偏见。相反,种族影响了证据积累的速度,对黑人目标的射击证据积累得更快。一些参与者也倾向于对黑人目标更加谨慎,设置更高的决策阈值。除了更全面、更丰富地描述是否开枪的决策外,动态模型还提出了一些干预措施,这些干预措施可能会解决在决定开枪时使用种族信息的问题,并提供衡量其效果的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69af/6096652/a26a410fe4ad/13423_2017_1369_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How race affects evidence accumulation during the decision to shoot.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1301-1330. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1369-6.
2
How prior information and police experience impact decisions to shoot.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Oct;115(4):601-623. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000130.
5
Stereotypic vision: how stereotypes disambiguate visual stimuli.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Feb;108(2):219-33. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000015.
7
Fight or flight: The role of context on biased intergroup shooting behaviors.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Feb;151(2):437-454. doi: 10.1037/xge0001082. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
8
Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1006-23. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1006.
9
Evidence of Racial Bias Using Immersive Virtual Reality: Analysis of Head and Hand Motions During Shooting Decisions.
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2021 May;27(5):2502-2512. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3067767. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
10
Selective responses to threat: the roles of race and gender in decisions to shoot.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;37(9):1274-81. doi: 10.1177/0146167211408617. Epub 2011 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual differences in speed-accuracy trade-off influence social decision-making in dyads.
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jul;292(2051):20251077. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.1077. Epub 2025 Jul 16.
2
Oscillatory Neural Correlates of Police Firearms Decision-Making in Virtual Reality.
eNeuro. 2024 Jul 30;11(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0112-24.2024. Print 2024 Jul.
3
Valuations of target items are drawn towards unavailable decoy items due to prior expectations.
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 24;3(7):pgae232. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae232. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
A Cognitive Computational Approach to Social and Collective Decision-Making.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;19(2):538-551. doi: 10.1177/17456916231186964. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
5
Face coverings differentially alter valence judgments of emotional expressions.
Basic Appl Soc Psych. 2023;45(4):91-106. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2023.2221360. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
What can evidence accumulation modelling tell us about human social cognition?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Mar;77(3):639-655. doi: 10.1177/17470218231176950. Epub 2023 May 23.
7
Psychology's Contributions to Anti-Blackness in the United States Within Psychological Research, Criminal Justice, and Mental Health.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;18(6):1282-1305. doi: 10.1177/17456916221141374. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
8
Avoiding costly mistakes in groups: The evolution of error management in collective decision making.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Aug 19;18(8):e1010442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010442. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Perception during use of force and the likelihood of firing upon an unarmed person.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 25;11(1):13313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90918-9.
10
Wise or mad crowds? The cognitive mechanisms underlying information cascades.
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 15;6(29):eabb0266. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb0266. eCollection 2020 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):35-57. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3.
3
Bayesian inference with Stan: A tutorial on adding custom distributions.
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Jun;49(3):863-886. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0746-9.
4
Bayesian analysis of factorial designs.
Psychol Methods. 2017 Jun;22(2):304-321. doi: 10.1037/met0000057. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
5
Diffusion theory of decision making in continuous report.
Psychol Rev. 2016 Jul;123(4):425-51. doi: 10.1037/rev0000023. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
6
A Multi-Level Bayesian Analysis of Racial Bias in Police Shootings at the County-Level in the United States, 2011-2014.
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 5;10(11):e0141854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141854. eCollection 2015.
8
Informing cognitive abstractions through neuroimaging: the neural drift diffusion model.
Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;122(2):312-336. doi: 10.1037/a0038894.
9
Dynamics of postdecisional processing of confidence.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Apr;144(2):489-510. doi: 10.1037/xge0000062.
10
Deciding on race: a diffusion model analysis of race-categorisation.
Cognition. 2015 Jun;139:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验