From *Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke's Medical Centers, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Milwaukee, WI; and †Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, FL.
Cardiol Rev. 2017 Nov/Dec;25(6):268-278. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000146.
There is growing evidence of a differential etiological basis for thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA), with ascending (As) TAAs being genetically mediated and descending (Des) TAAs more strongly related to acquired pathologies. A comprehensive literature review of this hypothesis has not been carried out. We carried out a systematic literature review based on the latest guidelines on TAA endorsed by the American Heart Association. The etiologies were classified as genetic and inherited, the studies were tabulated accordingly, and Hill's epidemiological criteria of causality were applied. We found 38 studies addressing the etiology of TAAs. Out of these, 17 were about genetic causes, 9 about acquired causes, and 4 had information regarding both etiologies. Multiple genetic studies showed a strong association of As TAA with different genetic mutations. Contrary to commonly held beliefs, acquired causes, that is, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and atherosclerosis, were negatively associated with As TAA and positively associated with Des TAA. Hypertension was only associated with Des TAA and dissections (TAAD), not with As TAA. Multiple studies fulfilled the criteria of strength of association (n = 4), consistency (n = 9), specificity (n = 5), temporality (24), biological gradient (n = 3), plausibility (n = 38), biological coherence (n = 25), experiment (n = 4), and analogy (n = 6). Our literature review supports the hypothesis that As TAA is genetically mediated and Des TAA is predominantly an acquired pathology, and supports the argument for genetic testing in all cases of As TAA.
越来越多的证据表明,胸主动脉瘤(TAA)的病因基础存在差异,升主动脉(As)TAA 具有遗传介导性,降主动脉(Des)TAA 则与获得性病变关系更为密切。目前尚未对这一假说进行全面的文献综述。我们按照美国心脏协会(AHA)最新发布的 TAA 指南,进行了系统的文献综述。将病因分为遗传和遗传性,相应地对研究进行制表,并应用 Hill 的因果关系流行病学标准。我们共发现 38 项关于 TAA 病因的研究。其中,17 项是关于遗传原因的,9 项是关于获得性原因的,4 项同时涉及两种病因。多项遗传研究表明,As TAA 与多种基因突变有很强的关联。与普遍的看法相反,获得性原因,即血脂异常、糖尿病和动脉粥样硬化,与 As TAA 呈负相关,与 Des TAA 呈正相关。高血压仅与 Des TAA 和夹层(TAAD)相关,与 As TAA 无关。多项研究满足关联强度(n = 4)、一致性(n = 9)、特异性(n = 5)、时间性(n = 24)、生物学梯度(n = 3)、合理性(n = 38)、生物学一致性(n = 25)、实验(n = 4)和类比(n = 6)的标准。我们的文献综述支持这样的假说,即 As TAA 是遗传介导的,而 Des TAA 主要是获得性病变,支持对所有 As TAA 病例进行基因检测的论点。