Moore Chris, Barresi John
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, HalifaxNS, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 25;8:1667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01667. eCollection 2017.
We consider the second-person or interactive approach to social understanding, conceived as an understanding of intentional relations. We identify five forms of second-person information - self-directedness, contingency, reciprocity, affective engagement, and shared intentions - that occur only in interactions. We assess the extent to which these forms of information are available to observers of interactions as well as to the participants of an interaction and conclude that whereas observers may gain some second-person information, interactive participants have a privileged position. We also ask whether these forms of second-person information can deliver social understanding in terms of the understanding of intentional relations that are descriptive of persons. We argue that whereas none of these forms alone is sufficient for understanding intentional relations, they all play an important role in the developmental processes that enable the construction of social understanding. Therefore, the second-person approach, understood as theorizing how second-person information available in interactions is used in the development of social understanding, is a critically important approach to a full theory of social understanding.
我们探讨了理解社会的第二人称或互动方法,这种方法被视为对意向性关系的理解。我们识别出仅在互动中出现的五种第二人称信息形式——自我指向性、偶然性、互惠性、情感投入和共享意图。我们评估了这些信息形式对于互动观察者以及互动参与者而言的可得程度,并得出结论:虽然观察者可能获得一些第二人称信息,但互动参与者具有特权地位。我们还会问,这些第二人称信息形式能否从对描述人的意向性关系的理解角度实现社会理解。我们认为,虽然这些形式单独而言都不足以理解意向性关系,但它们在促成社会理解构建的发展过程中都发挥着重要作用。因此,将第二人称方法理解为对互动中可用的第二人称信息如何用于社会理解发展进行理论化,这对于全面的社会理解理论而言是一种至关重要的方法。