Center for Maternal-Fetal, Neonatal and Reproductive Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan.
Collaborative Departments of Advanced Pediatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1540-0.
While several studies have demonstrated the increased risk of pregnancy complications for women of advanced age, few studies have focused on women with very advanced age (≥ 45), despite the increasing rate of pregnancy among such women. Furthermore, how such risks of increase in age differ by maternal characteristics are also poorly understood. Thus, we aimed to clarify pregnant outcomes among women with very advanced age and how the effect of age differs by method of conception and parity.
We used the national multicenter Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology perinatal database, including 365,417 women aged 30 years or older who delivered a singleton between 2005 and 2011. We divided women into four groups based on age (years): 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, and ≥45, and compared risk of adverse birth outcomes between the groups using Poisson regression. Effect modification by parity and use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) was also evaluated.
Compared with women aged 30-34 years, women aged 45 or older had higher risk of emergency cesarean delivery [adjusted risk ratio (aRR): 1.77, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.58-1.99], preeclampsia (aRR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.43-2.42), severe preeclampsia (aRR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.31-3.13), placenta previa (aRR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.60-2.95), and preterm birth (aRR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39). The effect of older age on risk of emergency cesarean section, preeclampsia, and preterm birth were significantly greater among those who conceived naturally compared to those who conceived by ART. The effect on emergency cesarean section was stronger among primiparous women, whereas the risk of preeclampsia associated with older age was significantly greater among multiparous women.
Very advanced maternal age (≥ 45) was related to greater risk for adverse birth outcomes compared to younger women, especially for maternal complications including cesarean section, preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and placenta previa. The magnitude of the influence of age also differed by conception method and by parity.
虽然已有多项研究表明,高龄产妇妊娠并发症的风险增加,但很少有研究关注年龄非常大(≥45 岁)的女性,尽管此类女性的妊娠率在不断上升。此外,年龄增加的风险如何因产妇特征而异也知之甚少。因此,我们旨在阐明年龄非常大的孕妇的妊娠结局,以及年龄的影响如何因受孕方式和产次的不同而不同。
我们使用了日本妇产科协会的全国多中心围产儿数据库,其中包括 2005 年至 2011 年间分娩单胎的 30 岁及以上的 365417 名妇女。我们根据年龄(岁)将妇女分为四组:30-34、35-39、40-44 和≥45,并使用泊松回归比较了各组之间不良妊娠结局的风险。还评估了产次和辅助生殖技术(ART)使用的效应修饰作用。
与 30-34 岁的妇女相比,年龄为 45 岁或以上的妇女剖宫产的风险更高[调整风险比(aRR):1.77,95%置信区间(95%CI):1.58-1.99]、子痫前期(aRR:1.86,95%CI:1.43-2.42)、重度子痫前期(aRR:2.03,95%CI:1.31-3.13)、前置胎盘(aRR:2.17,95%CI:1.60-2.95)和早产(aRR:1.20,95%CI:1.04-1.39)。与自然受孕相比,年龄较大对自然受孕妇女剖宫产、子痫前期和早产风险的影响更大。初产妇剖宫产风险更大,而高龄产妇子痫前期风险更大。
与年轻女性相比,高龄产妇(≥45 岁)发生不良妊娠结局的风险更高,尤其是与剖宫产、子痫前期、重度子痫前期和前置胎盘等母体并发症有关。年龄的影响程度也因受孕方式和产次而异。