Aaby P, Jensen T G, Hansen H L, Kristiansen H, Thårup J, Poulsen A, Sodemann M, Jakobsen M, Knudsen K, Clotilde da Silva M
Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lancet. 1988 Oct 8;2(8615):809-11. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92780-8.
In a randomised study of 558 children in an urban African community, the protective effect of the Edmonston-Zagreb (EZ) measles vaccine given in a dose of 40,000 plaque forming units from the age of 4 months was compared with the effects of a standard dose (6000 tissue culture infectious units) of Schwarz measles vaccine given from the age of 9 months. During two years of follow-up, all 14 clinical cases of measles occurred in the Schwarz group; 10 of the children contracted measles before vaccination and 4 after measles vaccination. Thus the EZ vaccine provided significant protection against measles both before and after the usual age of vaccination. Among the children who were exposed to measles at home, those given EZ vaccine were better protected than either unvaccinated children or those given the Schwarz vaccine.
在一项针对非洲城市社区558名儿童的随机研究中,对比了从4个月起接种剂量为40000蚀斑形成单位的埃德蒙斯顿- Zagreb(EZ)麻疹疫苗的保护效果与从9个月起接种标准剂量(6000组织培养感染单位)的施瓦茨麻疹疫苗的效果。在两年的随访期间,所有14例麻疹临床病例均发生在施瓦茨组;其中10名儿童在接种疫苗前感染麻疹,4名在接种麻疹疫苗后感染。因此,EZ疫苗在常规接种年龄前后均提供了显著的麻疹防护。在家庭中接触过麻疹的儿童中,接种EZ疫苗的儿童比未接种疫苗的儿童或接种施瓦茨疫苗的儿童得到了更好的保护。